Research and practice in management accounting: improving integration and communication

European Accounting Review

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 277-289

  Mitchell, Falconer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39949083546     PISSN: 09638180     EISSN: 14684497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638180020017087     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baxter, W. T., 1988. Accounting Research–Academic Trends versus Practical Needs, London: ICAS.
2. Choudhury, N., 1986. In search of relevance in management accounting research. Accounting and Business Research, Winter: 21–32.
3. CIMA 2000-1. 2000. A Survey of Practitioner Members, London: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
4. CIMA 2000-2. 2000. Official Terminology, London: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
5. Coates, J. B., Smith, J. E., and Stacey, R. J., 1983. Results of a preliminary survey into the structure of divisionalised performance appraisal companies, divisionalised performance appraisal and the associated role of management accounting
6. Cooper, D., Scapens, R., and Arnold, J., eds. Management Accounting Research and Practice, 265–282. London: The Institute of Cost and Management Accountants.
7. Coghlan, D., and Brannick, T., 2001. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization, London: Sage.
8. Eden, C., and Huxham, C., 1996. Action research for management research. British Journal of Management, 7: 75–86.
9. Edwards, K. A., and Emmanuel, C. R., 1990. “ Diverging Views on the Boundaries of Management Accounting ”. In Management Accounting Research 51–63.
10. Flint, D., 1988. Academic research and accounting practice. The Accountant's Magazine, May: 29–30.
11. Harris, E., 1999. “ Project risk assessment: a European field study ”. In British Accounting Review 347–371.
12. Innes, J., Mitchell, F., and Sinclair, D., 2000. “ Activity-based costing in the UK's largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey result ”. In Management Accounting Research 349–362.
13. Kasanen, E., Lukka, K., and Siitonen, A., 1993. The constructive approach in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 5: 241–264.
14. Lukka, K., 2000. “ The key issues of applying the constructive approach to field research ”. In Management Expertise for the New Millennium. In Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Edited by: Reponen, T., Publication of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration. A-1: 2000
15. Nicolini, D., Tomkins, C., Holti, R., Oldman, A., and Smalley, M., 2000. Can target costing and whole life costing be applied in the construction industry? Evidence from two case studie'. British Journal of Management, 11: 303–324.
16. Otley, D. T., 1985. Development in management accounting research. British Accounting Review, 17 Autumn: 3–23.
17. Scapens, R. W., 1991. Management Accounting. A Review of Recent Developments, 2nd edn, London: Macmillan.
18. Scapens, R. W., 1994. Never mind the gap: towards an institutional perspective on management accounting practice. Management Accounting Research, 5 (3/4): 301–323.
19. Seal, W., Cullen, J., Dunlop, A., Berry, T., and Ahmed, M., 1999. Enacting a European supply chain: a case study on the role of management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 10: 303–322.
20. Shields, M. D., 1995. An empirical analysis of firms' implementation experiences with activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7: 148–166.
21. Swenson, D., 1995. The benefits of activity-based cost management to the manufacturing industry. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7: 167–180.
22. Tuomela, T.-S., On trying to mobilise customer focus through strategic performance measurement: a constructive case study. Fifth International Seminar on Manufacturing Accounting Research. University of Pisa. pp. BB1–B29.