ASNM position statement: Intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 75-85

  Martin, William Hal ^a   Stecker, Mark M ^b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MENINGIOMA; NEURILEMOMA; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSURGERY; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PATIENT MONITORING; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STANDARD; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; WARMING;

ACTION POTENTIALS; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 39949083044     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9108-6     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Cohen NL, Lewis WS, Ransohoff J. Hearing preservation in cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery: The NYU experience 1974-1991. Am J Otol 1993;14: 423-433
2. Nadol JB Jr, Levine R, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL, Montgomery WW, de Sandoval PK. Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas of the internal auditory canal and cerebellarpontine angle. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1287-1294
3. Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Tonoli G. Mechanisms of auditory impairment during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:596-605
4. Mom T, Telischi FF, Martin GK, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL. Vasospasm of the internal auditory artery: Significance in cerebellopontine angle surgery. Am J Otol 2000;21:735-742
5. Frohling MA, Schlote W, Wolburg-Buchholz K. Nonselective nerve fibre damage in peripheral nerves after experimental thermocoagulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:1297-1302
6. Hnatuk LA, Li KT, Carvalho AJ, Freeman JL, Bilbao JM, McKee NH. The effect of bipolar electrocautery on peripheral nerves. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:1867-1874
7. Hatayama T, Sekiya T, Suzuki S, Iwabuchi T. Effect of compression on the cochlear nerve: A short- and long-term electrophysiological and histological study. Neurol Res 1999;21:599-610
8. Yingling CD, Gardi JN. Intraoperative monitoring of facial and cochlear nerves during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngologic Clin North Am 1992;25:413-448
9. Møller AR. Evoked potentials in intraoperative monitoring. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1988
10. McDaniel AB, Silverstein H, Norrell H. Retrolabyrinthine vestibular neurectomy with and without monitoring of eighth nerve potentials. Am J Otol 1985;Suppl:23-26
11. McElveen JT Jr, House JW, Hitselberger WE, Brackmann DE. Retrolabyrinthine vestibular nerve section: A viable alternative to the middle fossa approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;92:136-140
12. McLaughlin MR, Jannetta PJ, Clyde BL, Subach BR, Comey CH, Resnick DK. Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: Lessons learned after 4400 operations. J Neurosurg 1999;90:1-8
13. Jewett DL. Volume conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging from the cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970;28:609-618
14. Jewett DL, Romano MN, Williston JS. Human auditory evoked potentials: Possible brain stem components detected on the scalp. Science 1970;167:1517-1518
15. Jewett DL, Williston JS. Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971;94:681-696
16. Starr A, Achor LJ. Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease. Arch Neurol 1975;32:761-768
17. Starr A, Hamilton AE. Correlation between confirmed sites of neurological lesions and abnormalities of far-field auditory brain stem responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976;41:595-608
18. Starr A. Auditory brain stem response in brain death. Brain 1976;99:543-554
19. Stockard J, Rossiter K. Clinical and pathologic correlates of brainstem auditory evoked response abnormality. Neurology 1977;27:316-325
20. Levine RA, Montgomery WW, Ojemann RG, Pringer MFB. Evoked potential detection of hearing loss during acoustic neuroma surgery. Neurology 1978; 28: 339
21. Levine RA. Monitoring auditory evoked potentials during acoustic neuroma surgery. In: Silverstein H, Norell H eds. Neurological surgery of the ear. Alabama: Aesculapius Publishing Co; 287-293, 1980
22. Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Totsuka G, Mizutani H. Monitoring brainstem function during posterior fossa surgery with brainstem auditory evoked potentials. In: Barber C (ed) Evoked potentials. Lancaster, UK: MTP Press Limited; 377-390, 1980
23. Raudzens P, Shetter A. Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 1982;57:341-348
24. Grundy BL, Lina A, Procopio PT, Jannetta PJ. Reversible evoked potential changes with retraction of the eighth cranial nerve. Anesth Analg (Cleveland) 1981;60:835-838
25. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ. Compound action potentials recorded intracranially from the auditory nerve in man. Neurology 1982;78:144-157
26. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ, Sekhar LN. Contributions from the auditory nerve to the brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs): Results of intracranial recording in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;71:198-211
27. Martin WH, Pratt H, Schwegler JW. The origin of the human auditory brainstem response wave II. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:357-370
28. Kimura J, Mitsudojme A, Yamada T, Dickins QS. Stationary peaks from a moving source in far-field recording. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984;58:351-361
29. Kimura J, Kimura A, Ishida T, Kudo Y, Suzuki S, Machida M, Matsuoka H, Yamada T. What determines the latency and amplitude of stationary peaks in far-field recordings? Ann Neurol 1986;19:479-486
30. Jewett, Deupree DL. Far-field potentials recorded from action potentials and from a tripole in a hemicylindrical volume. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;72:439-449
31. Deupree DL, Jewett DL. Far-field potentials due to action potentials traversing curved axon, reaching cut nerve ends, and crossing boundaries between cylindrical volumes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;70:355-362
32. Jewett DL, Deupree DL, Bommannan D. Far-field potentials generated by action potentials of isolated sciatic nerves in a spherical volume. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;57:105-117
33. Nakinishi T. Action potentials recorded by fluid electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;53:343-345
34. Nakinishi T. Origin of action potentials recorded by fluid electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;55:114-115
35. Stegeman DF, Van Oosterom A, Colon EJ. Far-field evoked potential components induced by a propagating generator: Computational evidence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;67:176-187
36. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ. Auditory evoked potentials recorded from the cochlear nucleus and its vicinity in man. J Neurosurg 1983;59:1013-1018
37. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ, Jho HD. Click-evoked response from the cochlear nucleus: A study in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;92:215-224
38. Møller AR, Jho HD, Yokota M, Jannetta PJ. Contribution from crossed and uncrossed brainstem structures to the brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP): A study in humans. Laryngoscope 1995;105(6):596-605
39. Møller AR, Jho HD. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: Effects of stimulus intensity and polarity. Audiology 1991;30:142-163
40. Møller AR. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. Luxembourg: Harwood Academic Publishers; 45-126, 1995
41. Durrant JD, Martin WH, Hirsh B, Schwegler JW. 3CLT ABR analyses in human subject with unilateral extirpation of the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 1994;72:99-107
42. Don M, Vermiglio AJ, Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A. Variable effects of click polarity on auditory brain-stem response latencies: Analyses of narrow-band ABR's suggest possible explanations. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:458-472
43. Fowler CG, Bauch CD, Olsen WO. Diagnostic implication of stimulus polarity effects on the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:72-82
44. Schoonhoven R. Dependence of auditory brainstem response on click polarity and high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1992;31:72-86
45. Hall JW III. Intraoperative monitoring. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Allyn and Bacon: Needham Heights, 1992: 521
46. Stypulkowski PH, Staller SJ. Clinical evaluation of a new ECoG recording electrode. Ear Hear 1987;8:304-310
47. Cueva RA, Morris GF, Prioleau GR. Direct cochlear nerve monitoring: First report on a new atraumatic, self-retaining electrode. Am J Otol 1998;19:202-207
48. Roberson J, Senne A, Brackmann D, Hitselberger WE, Saunders J. Direct cochlear nerve action potentials as an aid to hearing preservation in middle cranial fossa acoustic tumor resection. Am J Otol 1996;17:653-657
49. Doyle DJ, Hyde ML. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1981;10:81-89
50. John ER, Baird H, Fridman J, Bergelson M. Normative values for brainstem auditory evoked potentials obtained by digital filtering and automatic peak detection. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:153-160
51. Mason SM. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response. Br J Audiol 1984;18:155-161
52. Kavanagh KT, Harker LA, Tyler RS. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveforem identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-Hz tone pip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1984;108:1-12
53. Matthies C, Samii M. Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): The value of neurophysiology for intraoperative monitoring of auditory function in 200 cases. Neurosurgery 1997;40:459-468
54. Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Mocella S, Policante Z. ECochG, CNAP and ABR monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery. Audiology 1998;37:27-37
55. Colletti V, Fiorino FG. Advances in monitoring of seventh and eighth cranial nerve function during posterior fossa surgery. Am J Otol 1998;19:503-512
56. James ML, Hussain AM. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring: When is change in wave V significant? Neurology 2005;65:1551-1555
57. Polo G, Fischer C, Sindou MP, Marneffe V. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss-prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 patients. Neurosurgery 2004;54:97-104
58. Saito T, Yamamoto I, Huang XL, Yukawa N, Osawa M, Takeichi S. Effects of muscle relaxants on EEG, ABR, and EMG in rabbits. Hum Exp Toxicol 1999;18:718-723
59. Nuwer MR. Brainstem auditory monitoring and related techniques. Evoked potential monitoring in the operating room. New York: Raven Press; 158-161, 1986
60. Drummond JC, Todd MM, U HS. The effect of high dose sodium thiopental on brain stem auditory and median nerve somatosensory evoked responses in humans. Anesthesiology 1985;63:249-254
61. Stockard JJ, Sharbrough F, Tinker J. Effects of hypothermia on the human brain stem auditory response. Ann Neurol 1978;3:368-370
62. Markand ON, Warren C, Mallik GS, Williams CJ. Temperature-dependent hysteresis in somatosensory and auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;77:425-35
63. Rodriguez RA, Edmonds HL, Auden SM, Austin EH. Auditory brainstem evoked responses and temperature monitoring during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:832-839
64. Rizvi SS, Goyal RN, Calder HB. Hearing preservation in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Laryngoscope 1999;109:591-594
65. Fischer G, Costantini JL, Mercier P. Improvement of hearing after microsurgical removal of acoustic neuroma. Neurosurgery 1980;7:154-159
66. Kileny PR, Edwards BM, Disher MJ, Telian SA. Hearing improvement after resection of cerebellopontine angle meningioma: Case study of the preoperative role of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1998;9:251-256
67. Manninen PH, Patterson S, Lam AM, Gelb AW, Nantau WE. Evoked potential monitoring during posterior fossa aneurysm surgery: A comparison of two modalities. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:92-97
68. Little JR, Lesser RP, Luders H. Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation. Neurosurgery 1987;20:421-427
69. Friedman WA, Kaplan BL, Day AL, Sypert GW, Curran MT. Evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm operation: Observations after fifty cases. Neurosurgery 1987;20:678-687
70. Kveton JF. The efficacy of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in acoustic tumor surgery. Laryngoscope 1990;100(11):1171-1173
71. Fischer G, Fischer C, Remond J. Hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma. J Neurosurg 1992;76:910-917
72. Slavit DH, Harner SG, Harper CM Jr, Beatty CW. Auditory monitoring during acoustic neuroma removal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117(10):1153-1157
73. Harper CM, Harner SG, Slavit DH, Litchy WJ, Daube JR, Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ. Effect of BAEP monitoring on hearing preservation during acoustic neuroma resection. Neurology 1992;42:1551-1553
74. Jannetta PJ Møller AR Møller MB Technique of hearing preservation in small acoustic neuromas. Ann Surg 1984;200:513-523
75. Radtke RA, Erwin CW, Wilkins RH. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: Significant decrease in postoperative morbidity. Neurology 1989;39(2 Pt 1):187-191
76. Kurokawa Y, Uede T, Hashi K. Functional results of preservation of cranial nerves in removal of acoustic neurinoma (Japanese). No Shinkei Geka 1992;10:139-145
77. NIH Consensus Development Conference. Acoustic Neuroma, Consensus Statement, December 11-13, Vol. 9, Number 3, 1991: 11
78. Rosenberg SI, Martin WH, Pratt H, Schwegler JW. Bipolar cochlear nerve recording technique: A preliminary report. Am J Otol 1993;14:362-368
79. Butler S, Coakham H, Maw R, Morgan H. Physiological identification of the auditory nerve during surgery for acoustic neuroma. Clin Otolaryngol 1995;20:312-317
80. Nuwer M. Assessment of digital EEG, quantitative EEG, and EEG brain mapping: Report of the American academy of neurology and the American clinical neurophysiology society. Neurology 1997;49:277-292