Three-dimensional mesh resolution control in finite difference groundwater flow models through boxed spatial zooming

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 351, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 261-267

  Székely, Ferenc ^a  

^a Bocskai utca 13   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Boxed spatial zooming; Mesh interface simulator; MODFLOW compatibility; Multi mesh modeling; Well flow modeling

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; STEADY FLOW;

BOXED SPATIAL ZOOMING; MESH RESOLUTION CONTROL;

GROUNDWATER FLOW;

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; STEADY FLOW;

AQUIFER; COMPOSITE; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WELL;

EID: 39849104589     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.038     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Axelsson O., and Lindskog G. On the eigenvalue distribution of a class of preconditioning methods. Numerische Mathematik 48 (1986) 479-498
2. Chiang W.-H., and Kinzelbach W. 3D-Groundwater Modeling with PMWIN (2001), Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York p. 346
3. Hilll M.C. Solving groundwater flow problems by conjugate-gradient methods and the strongly implicit procedure. Water Resources Research 26 9 (1990) 1961-1969
4. McDonald, M.G., Harbaugh, A.W., 1988. MODFLOW, A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model, Open-file report 83-875, Chapter A1. US Geological Survey.
5. Mehl S., and Hill M.C. Development and evaluation of a local grid refinement method for block-centered finite-difference groundwater models using shared nodes. Advances in Water Resources 25 5 (2002) 497-511
6. Mehl, S., Hill, M.C., 2005. MODFLOW-2005, The US Geological Survey modular ground-water model - documentation of shared node local grid refinement (LGR) and the boundary flow and head (BFH) package. Chapter 12 of Book 6, Modeling Techniques Section A, Ground Water. Techniques and Methods 6-A12. US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.
7. Peaceman D.W., and Rachford Jr. H.H. The numerical solution of parabolic and elliptic differential equations. Journal Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics 3 (1955) 28-41
8. Székely F. Drawdown around a well in a heterogeneous, leaky aquifer system. Journal of Hydrology 118 (1990) 247-256
9. Székely F., and Al-Rashed M. Simulation of flow to multiscreened wells in heterogeneous layered formations. Computational Methods in Water Resources XI. Computational Methods in Subsurface Flow and Transport Problems vol. 1 (1996), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton Boston 671-678
10. Székely F. Windowed spatial zooming in finite difference ground water flow models. Ground Water 36 (1998) 718-721
11. Székely F. Numerical modeling of drainage schemes in layered formations: a Kuwait City case study. Ground Water 37 (1999) 879-883
12. Székely F., Senay Y., Al-Rashed M., Al-Sumait A., and Al-Awadi E. Computer simulation of the hydraulic impact of water well fields in Kuwait. Journal of Hydrology 235 (2000) 205-220