Performance, energy and cost evaluation of a nanofiltration plant operated at elevated temperatures

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 36-45

  Nilsson, Mattias ^a   Lipnizki, Frank ^b   Trägårdh, Gun ^a   Östergren, Karin ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b ALFA LAVAL   (Denmark)

^c Ideon Science Park   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Economics; Energy; Nanofiltration; Temperature

Indexed keywords

ENERGY UTILIZATION; HIGH TEMPERATURE OPERATIONS; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PRESSURE DROP; THERMAL EFFECTS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CONCENTRATION POLARISATION; COST EVALUATION; ELEVATED TEMPERATURES; NANOFILTRATION PLANTS;

NANOFILTRATION;

EID: 39849102992     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.07.051     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J. Wagner,Membrane filtration handbook: practical tips and hints, OSMONICS filtration and separation group, 2001.
2. Snow M.J.H., deWinter D., Buckingham R., Campbell J., and Wagner J. New techniques for extreme conditions: high temperature reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Desalination 105 (1996) 57-61
3. Ben Amar N., Saidani H., Deratani A., and Palmeri J. Effect of temperature on the transport of water and neutral solutes across nanofiltration membranes. Langmuir 23 (2007) 2937-2952
4. Mänttari M., Pihlajamäki A., Kaipainen E., and Nyström M. Effect of temperature and membrane pre-treatment by pressure on the filtration properties of nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 145 (2002) 81-86
5. Nilsson M., Trägårdh G., and Östergren K. The influence of different kinds of pre-treatment on the performance of a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 195 (2006) 160-168
6. Nilsson M., Trägårdh G., and Östergren K. The influence of sodium chloride on mass transfer in a polyamide nanofiltration membrane at elevated temperatures. J. Membr. Sci. 280 (2006) 928-936
7. White F. Fluid Mechanics. 4th ed. (1994), McGraw-Hill, New York
8. De S., and Bhattacharya P. Prediction of mass-transfer coefficient with suction in the applications of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 128 (1997) 119-131
9. Wesselingh J., and Krishna R. Mass Transfer in Multicomponent Mixtures. 1st ed. (2000), Delft University Press, Delft
10. Bennett C., and Myers J. Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer. 2nd ed. (1982), McGraw-Hill, New York
11. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. 2nd ed. (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
12. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., and Riley R.L. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 9 (1965) 1341-1362
13. Teixeira M., Rosa M., and Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160-166
14. Manth T., Gabor M., and Oklejas E. Minimizing RO energy consumption under variable conditions of operation. Desalination 157 (2003) 9-21
15. Nisan S., Commercon B., and Dardour S. A new method for the treatment of the reverse osmosis process, with preheating of the feedwater. Desalination 182 (2005) 483-495
16. IChemE. A Guide to Capital Cost Estimation. 2nd ed. (1988), The Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby pp. 14-19