Intersubjective corroboration

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 124-132

  Rowbottom, Darrell Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesianism; Confirmation; Corroboration; Formal epistemology; Intersubjective probability; Karl Popper

Indexed keywords

EID: 39849099494     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Achinstein, P. (1994). Explanation v. prediction: Which carries more weight? In D. Hull, M. Forbes, & R. M. Burian (Eds.), PSA 1994, Vol. 2 (pp. 156–164). East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
2. W.P. Alston A realist conception of truth 1996 Cornell University Press Ithaca
3. G. Andersson Criticism and the history of science: Kuhn’s, Lakatos’s and Feyerabend’s criticisms of critical rationalism 1994 Brill Leiden
4. R. Audi Dispositional beliefs and dispositions to believe Noûs 28 1994 419 434
5. Ayer, A. J. (1974). Truth, verification, and verisimilitude. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 684–692). Library of Living Philosophers, XIV. La Salle: Open Court.
6. W.W. Bartley The retreat to commitment 2nd ed. 1984 Open Court La Salle
7. Bertrand, J. (1960). Calcul des probabilités (3rd ed.). New York: Chelsea. (First published 1889)
8. D. Bohm Hidden variables and the implicate order B.J. Hiley D.F. Peat Quantum implications: Essays in honour of David Bohm 1987 Routledge London 33 45
9. L.A. Boland Scientific thinking without scientific method: Two views of Popper R. Backhouse New directions in economic methodology 1994 Routledge London 154 172
10. R. Carnap Logical foundations of probability 2nd ed. 1962 University of Chicago Press Chicago
11. G. Contessa Popper on the logical possibility of universal laws Philosophical Writings 31 2006 45 52
12. M. Curd J.A. Cover Philosophy of science: The central issues 1998 W.W. Norton New York
13. J.T. Cushing Quantum mechanics: Historical contingency and the Copenhagen hegemony 1994 University of Chicago Press Chicago
14. B. De Finetti Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources H.E. Kyburg H.E. Smokler Studies in subjective probability 1937 John Wiley & Sons New York 93 158
15. M.F. Fox Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes The Journal of Higher Education 65 1994 298 309
16. J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head Nature 438 2005 900 901
17. D.A. Gillies Intersubjective probability and confirmation theory British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 1991 513 533
18. Gillies, D. A. (1998). Confirmation theory. In D. M. Gabbay, & P. Smets (Eds.), Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems, Vol. 1 (pp. 135–167). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. D.A. Gillies Philosophical theories of probability 2000 Routledge London
20. S. Haack What is ‘the problem of the empirical basis’, and does Johnny Wideawake solve it? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 1991 369 389
21. A. Hájek What conditional probability could not be Synthese 137 2003 273 323
22. E. Hecht Optics 3rd ed. 1998 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
23. C.G. Hempel Philosophy of natural science 1966 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
24. C. Howson Must the logical probability of laws be zero? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 1973 153 182
25. C. Howson Popper, prior probabilities, and inductive inference British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 1987 207 224
26. E.T. Jaynes Information theory and statistical mechanics Physical Review 106 1957 620 630
27. E.T. Jaynes The well posed problem Foundations of Physics 4 1973 477 492
28. J.M. Keynes A treatise on probability 1921 Macmillan London
29. Koop, T., Pöschl, U. (2006). Systems: An open, two-stage peer review journal. Nature . http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html .
30. T.S. Kuhn Reflections on my critics I. Lakatos A. Musgrave Criticism and the growth of knowledge 1970 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 231 278
31. T.S. Kuhn The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change 1977 University of Chicago Press Chicago
32. I. Lakatos Methodology of scientific research programmes I. Lakatos A. Musgrave Criticism and the growth of knowledge 1970 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 91 196
33. L. Laudan Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate 1984 University of California Press Ewing
34. L. Marinoff A resolution of Bertrand’s paradox Philosophy of Science 61 1994 1 24
35. D. Miller Critical rationalism: A restatement and defence 1994 Open Court Chicago
36. W.H. Newton-Smith The rationality of science 1981 Routledge London
37. A. O’Hear Karl Popper 1980 Routledge & Kegan Paul London
38. P.N. Pettit When to defer to majority testimony—and when not Analysis 66 2006 179 187
39. K.R. Popper What is dialectic? Mind 49 1940 403 426
40. K.R. Popper The logic of scientific discovery 1959 Basic Books New York
41. K.R. Popper Remarks on the problems of demarcation and of rationality I. Lakatos A. Musgrave Problems in the philosophy of science 1968 North-Holland Amsterdam 88 102
42. K.R. Popper Objective knowledge 1972 Oxford University Press Oxford
43. K.R. Popper Realism and the aim of science 1983 Routledge London
44. Putnam, H. (1969). The ‘corroboration’ of theories. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 221–240). Library of Living Philosophers, XIV. La Salle: Open Court.
45. F.P. Ramsey Truth and probability H.E. Kyburg H.E. Smokler Studies in subjective probability 1926 John Wiley & Sons New York 61 92
46. Rowbottom, D.P. (2005). The empirical stance vs. the critical attitude. South African Journal of Philosophy , 24 , 200–223. (Available at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002450/01/Rowbottom.pdf )
47. D.P. Rowbottom In defence of Popper on the logical possibility of universal laws: A reply to Contessa Philosophical Writings 31 2006 53 60
48. D.P. Rowbottom The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument Studia Logica 87 2007 65 71
49. Rowbottom, D.P. (In Progress). On the proximity of the logical and objective Bayesian interpretations of probability.
50. L.J. Snyder Is evidence historical? P. Achinstein L.J. Snyder Scientific methods: Conceptual and historical problems 1994 Krieger Malabar, FL 95 117
51. B.C. van Fraassen The scientific image 1980 Oxford University Press Oxford
52. J.O.D. Williamson Bayesian nets and causality: Philosophical and computational foundations 2005 Oxford University Press Oxford
53. J. Worrall The value of a fixed methodology British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 1988 263 275
54. E. Zahar The problem of the empirical basis A. O’Hear Karl Popper: Philosophy and problems 1995 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 45 74