Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening

System

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 35-51

  Field, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory processing; Gating; Lexical segmentation; On line processing; Perseveration; Second language listening; Spoken word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 39849095559     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2007.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arciuli, J., Cupples, L., 2003. Stress typicality effects in native and non-native speakers of English. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona: pp. 2051-2054.
2. Bard E.G., Shillcock R.C., and Altmann G.T.M. The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: effects of subsequent context. Perception and Psychophysics 44 (1988) 395-408
3. Brown G. Listening to Spoken English. second ed. (1990), Longman, Harlow
4. Cole R.A., and Jakimik J. A model of speech perception. In: Cole R.A. (Ed). Perception and Production of Fluent Speech (1980), Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ 133-163
5. Cotton S., and Grosjean F. The gating paradigm: a comparison of successive and individual presentation formats. Perception and Psychophysics 35 (1984) 41-48
6. Cruttenden A. Intonation (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Cutler A. The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing. Speech Communication 21 (1997) 3-15
8. Cutler A., and Carter D.M. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language 2 (1987) 133-142
9. Field, J., 2001. Lexical segmentation in first and foreign language listening. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.
10. Field J. Promoting perception: lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal 57/4 (2003) 325-334
11. Field, J., in press. Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Grosjean F. Spoken word-recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics 28 (1980) 267-283
13. Grosjean F. The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets: evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics 38 (1985) 299-310
14. Grosjean F. Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (1996) 597-604
15. Leech G., Rayson P., and Wilson A. Word Frequencies in Spoken and Written English (2001), Longman, Harlow
16. Lindfield K.C., Wingfield A., and Goodglass H. The role of prosody in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language 68 (1999) 312-317
17. Luce P.A. A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 39 (1986) 155-158
18. Luce P.A., and McLennan C.T. Spoken word recognition. In: Pisoni D.B., and Remez R.E. (Eds). The Handbook of Speech Perception (2005), Blackwell, Oxford pp. 591-609
19. Marslen-Wilson W. Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature 244 (1973) 522-523
20. Marslen-Wilson W. Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science 189 (1975) 226-228
21. Marslen-Wilson W. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition 25 (1987) 71-102
22. McQueen J. Speech perception. In: Lamberts K., and Goldstone R. (Eds). The Handbook of Cognition (2004), Sage, London 255-275
23. Montgomery J. Recognition of gated words by children with specific language impairment: an examination of lexical mapping. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42 (1999) 735-743
24. Pickett J.M., and Pollack I. Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech. Effects of rate of utterance and duration of excerpt. Language and Speech 6 (1963) 151-164
25. Shockey L. Sound Patterns of Spoken English (2003), Blackwell, Oxford
26. Stine E.A., and Wingfield A. Older adults can inhibit high-probability competitors in speech recognition. Aging and Cognition 1 (1994) 152-157
27. Tyler L.K. Spoken Language Comprehension (1992), MIT, Cambridge, MA pp. 77-84
28. Tyler L.K., and Wessels J. Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data. Perception and Psychophysics 38 (1985) 217-222