Cryptic lineages and hybridization in freshwater mussels of the genus Pyganodon (Unionidae) in northeastern North America

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1216-1227

  Cyr, Frédéric ^a   Paquet, Annie ^b   Martel, André L ^c   Angers, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MINISTÈRE DES RESSOURCES NATURELLES ET DE LA FAUNE   (Canada)

^c CANADIAN MUSEUM OF NATURE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS;

CRYPTIC LINEAGES; FRESHWATER MUSSELS PYGANODON; NUCLEAR GENOMES;

BIODIVERSITY;

ANCESTRY; BIVALVE; DIVERGENCE; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HYBRIDIZATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MORPHOLOGY; NEW GENUS; SHELL; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

PYGANODON; PYGANODON CATARACTA; PYGANODON FRAGILIS; PYGANODON GRANDIS; UNIONIDAE;

EID: 39849085578     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z07-104     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baker, A.M., Bartlett, C., Bunn, S.E., Goodkamp, K., Sheldon, F., and Hughes, J.M. 2003. Cryptic species and morphological plasticity in long-lived bivalves (Unionoida: Hyriidae) from inland Australia. Mol. Ecol. 12: 2707-2717. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01941.x.
2. Bernatchez, L., Glémet, H., Wilson, C., and Danzmann, R.G. 1995. Introgression and fixation of Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) mitochondrial genome in an allopatric population of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 179-185. doi:10.1139/f95-018.
3. Clarke, A.H. 1981. The freshwater molluscs of Canada. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
4. Clarke, A.H., and Rick, A.M. 1963. Supplementary records of Unionacea from Nova Scotia with a discussion of the diversity of Anodonta fragilis Lamarck. Natl. Mus. Can. Bull. 199: 15-27.
5. Curole, J.P., and Kocher, T.D. 2005. Evolution of a unique mitotype-specific protein-coding extension of the cytochrome c oxidase II gene in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida). J. Mol. Evol. 60: 1-10. doi:10.1007/s00239-004-0192-7.
6. Felsenstein, J. 2005. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package). Version 3.6 [computer program]. J. Felsenstein, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle. Available from http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/ phylip.html [accessed October 2007].
7. Felsenstein, J., and Churchill, G.A. 1996. A Hidden Markov Model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 93-104.
8. Fuller, S.L.H. 1974. Clams and mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia). In Pollution ecology of freshwater invertebrates. Edited by C.W. Hart and S.L.H. Fuller. Academic Press, New York. pp. 215-273.
9. Graf, D.L., and Foighil, D.Ô. 2000. The evolution of brooding characters among the freshwater pearly mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of North America. J. Molluscan Stud. 66: 157-170. doi:10.1093/mollus/66.2.157.
10. Hanlon, S.D., and Smith, D.G. 1999. An attempt to detect Pyganodon fragilis (Mollusca: Unionidae) in Maine. Northeast Nat. 6: 119-132. doi:10.2307/3858344.
11. Hillis, D.M., and Bull, J.J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192. doi:10.2307/2992540.
12. Hoeh, W.R. 1990. Phylogenetic relationships among eastern North American Anodonta (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacol. Rev. 23: 63-82.
13. Hoeh, W.R., and Burch, J.B. 1989. The taxonomic status of Anodonta lacustris Lea (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Walkerana, 3: 263-276.
14. Hoeh, W.R., Stewart, D.T., and Guttman, S.I. 2002. High fidelity of mitochondrial genome transmission under the doubly uniparental mode of inheritance in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Evolution, 56: 2252-2261.
15. Kat, P.W. 1983. Genetic and morphological divergence among nominal species of North American Anodonta (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacologia, 23: 361-374.
16. Kat, P.W. 1984. Parasitism and the Unionacea (Bivalvia). Biol. Rev. (Camb.), 59: 189-207.
17. Kat, P.W. 1985. Historical evidence for fluctuation in levels of hybridization. Evolution, 39: 1164-1169. doi:10.2307/2408745.
18. Kat, P.W. 1986. Hybridization in a unionid faunal suture zone. Malacologia, 27: 107-125.
19. King, T.L., Eackles, M.S., Gjetvaj, B., and Hoeh, W.R. 1999. Intraspecific phylogeography of Lasmigona subviridis (Bivalvia: Unionidae): conservation implications of range discontinuity. Mol. Ecol. 8: S65-S78. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00784.x.
20. Krebs, R.A. 2004. Combining paternally and maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA for analysis of population structure in mussels. Mol. Ecol. 13: 1701-1705. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02133.x.
21. Lachenbruch, P.A., and Mickey, M.R. 1968. Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics, 10: 1-11. doi:10.2307/1266219.
22. Legendre, P., and Legendre, V. 1984. Postglacial dispersal of freshwater fishes in the Québec Peninsula. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 1781-1803.
23. Liu, H.P., Mitton, J.B., and Wu, S.K. 1996. Paternal mitochondrial DNA differentiation far exceeds maternal mitochondrial DNA and allozyme differentiation in the freshwater mussel, Anodonta grandis grandis. Evolution, 50: 952-957. doi:10.2307/2410870.
24. Lydeard, C., Mulvey, M., and Davis, G.M. 1996. Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. No. 351. pp. 1593-1603. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0143.
25. Lydeard, C., Cowie, R.H., Ponder, W.F., Bogan, A.E., Bouchet, P., Clark, S.A., Cummings, K.S., Frest, T.J., Gargominy, O., Herbert, D.G., Hershler, R., Perez, K.E., Roth, B., Seddon, M., Strong, E.E., and Thompson, F.G. 2004. The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. Bioscience, 54: 321-330. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0321:TGDONM]2.0.CO;2.
26. Mulvey, M., Lydeard, C., Pyer, D.L., Hicks, K.M., Brim-Box, J., Williams, J.D., and Butler, R.S. 1997. Conservation genetics of North American freshwater mussels Amblema and Megalonaias. Conserv. Biol. 11: 868-878. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95487.x.
27. Orita, M., Iwahana, H., Kanazawa, H., and Sckiya, T. 1989. Rapid and sensitive detection of point mutations and DNA polymorphisms using the polymerase chain reaction. Genomics, 5: 874-879. doi:10.1016/0888- 7543(89)90129-8.
28. Page, R.D.M. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Cabios, 12: 357-358.
29. Parkin, E.J., and Butlin, R.K. 2004. Within- and between-individual sequence variation among ITS1 copies in the meadow grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus indicates frequent intachromosomal gene conversion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1595-1601. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh163.
30. Roe, K.J., and Lydeard, C. 1998. Species delineation and the identification of evolutionarily significant units: lessons from the freshwater mussel genus Potamilus (Bivalvia: Unionidae). J. Shellfish Res. 19: 1359-1363.
31. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
32. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
33. Scott, W.B., and Crossman, E.J. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. No. 184.
34. Sheffield, V.C., Beck, J.S., Kwitek, A.E., Sandstrom, D.W., and Stone, E.W. 1993. The sensitivity of single strand conformation polymorphism analysis for the detection of single base substitutions. Genomics, 16: 325-332. doi:10.1006/geno.1993.1193.
35. SPSS Inc. 2004. SPSS®. Version 13.0.1 [computer program]. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
36. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.G. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680. doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.
37. Turgeon, D.D., Bogan, A.E., Coan, E.V., Emerson, W.K., Lyons, W.G., Pratt, W.L., Roper, C.F.E., Scheltema, A., Thompson, F.G., and Williams, J.D. 1988. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: mollusks. Spec. Publ. Am. Fish. Soc. No. 16.
38. Williams, J.D., Warren, M.L., Cummings, K.S., Harris, J.L., and Neves, R.J. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries (Bethesda), 18: 6-22. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1993) 018〈0006:CSOFMO〉2.0.CO;2.
39. Zouros, E., Freeman, K.R., Ball, V., and Pogson, G.H. 1992. Direct evidence for extensive paternal mitochondrial DNA inheritance in the marine mussel Mytilus. Nature (London), 359: 412-414. doi:10.1038/359412a0.