Binary regression in truncated samples, with application to comparing dietary instruments in a large prospective study

Biometrics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 289-298

  Midthune, Douglas ^a   Kipnis, Victor ^a   Freedman, Laurence S ^b   Carroll, Raymond J ^c  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b GERTNER INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH   (Israel)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biased sampling; Breast cancer; Case control studies; Comparison of instruments; Measurement error; Misspecified models; Nutritional epidemiology; Truncation; Women's Health Initiative

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; NUTRITION;

APPROXIMATE METHODS; BIASED SAMPLING; BINARY REGRESSION; BREAST CANCER; CASE-CONTROL STUDY; COMPARISON OF INSTRUMENT; MISSPECIFIED MODELS; NUTRITIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY; TRUNCATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVE;

APPROXIMATION THEORY;

CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NUTRITION; SAMPLING BIAS; WOMENS HEALTH;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN INTAKE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SAMPLING ERROR;

EID: 39849083923     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00833.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)