Social facilitators and inhibitors to online fluency

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Haythornthwaite, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS CONTROL; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; WEB SERVICES;

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURES; SOCIAL NETWORKS;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 39749195457     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2007.488     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (63)

1. Anderson, B., and Tracey, K. (2002). "Digital living: The impact (or Otherwise) of the Internet in everyday British life", in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet In Everyday Life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 139-163.
2. Bishop, A. P., Bazzell, P., Mehra, B., and Smith, C. (2001). "Afya: Social and digital technologies that reach across the digital divide", First Monday, 6(4). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_4/bishop/ index.html.
3. Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B. and Rainie, L. (2006). The Strength of Internet Ties. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved May 28, 2006 from: www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_ties.pdf
4. Bowen, T. S. (November 21, 2001). English could snowball on Net. Technology Research News. (http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/2001/112101/ English_could_snowball_on_N et_ 112101 .html
5. Bregman, A. and Haythornthwaite, C. (2003). "Radicals of presentation: Visibility, relation, and copresence in persistent conversation." New Media and Society, 5(1), 117-140
6. Brock, A. (2005). " 'A belief in humanity is a belief in colored men:' Using culture to span the digital divide", JCMC, 11(1), article 17. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11 /issue1/brock.html
7. Commission of the European Communities (2005). elnclusion revisited: The local dimension of the information society. http://europa.eu.int/comm/ employment_social/news/2005/f eb/eincllocal_en.pdf
8. Davidson, T., Sooryamoorthy, R. and Shrum, W. (2002). "Kerala connections: Will the Internet affect science in developing areas?" In B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet In Everyday Life (pp. 496-519). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9. Ess, C. and Sudweeks, F. (2005). "Culture and computer-mediated communication: Toward new understandings." JCMC, 11(1), article 9. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issuel/ess.html
10. Fallows, D. (2004). The Internet and Daily Life. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_and_Daily_Life.pdf
11. Fallows, D. (2005). How Women and Men Use the Internet, http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Women_and_Men_online.pdf
12. Gandal, N. and Shapiro, C. (2001). The Effect of Native Language on Internet usage. Paper presented at the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, October 27-29, 2001, Alexandria, VA.
13. Gaver, W.W., Dunne, A., Pacenti, E. (1999). "Design: Cultural probes."Interactions, 6(1), 21-29.
14. Girard, M. and Stark, D. (forthcoming). "Socio-technologies of assembly: Sense-making and demonstration in rebuilding lower Manhattan." In D. Lazer and V. Mayer-Schoengerger (Eds.), Governance and information: The Rewiring of governing and deliberation in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Global Reach (Sept. 2004). Global Internet Statistics (by Language). Retrieved May 31, 2006 from: http://global-reach.biz/globstats/ index.php3, and http ://www.gireach.com/globstats/ref s.php3
16. Guardian Unlimited (March 3, 2005) "All wired up." Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005 from http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,1428626,00. html
17. Hagar, C. (2005). The Farming Community in Crisis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
18. Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). "Strong, weak and latent ties and the impact of new media." The Information Society, 18(5), 385-401.
19. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). "Social networks and Internet connectivity effects." Information, Communication and Society, 8(2), 125-147.
20. Haythornthwaite, C. (forthcoming). "Articulating divides in distributed knowledge practice." Information, Communication & Society.
21. Haythornthwaite, C. and Kazmer, M. M. (2002). "Bringing the Internet home: Adult distance learners and their Internet, Home and Work worlds", in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 431-463.
22. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robins, J. and Shoemaker, S. (2000). "Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 0(1). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vo16/issuel/haythornthwaite.html.
23. Horrigan, J. (2005). Broadband Adoption at Home in the United States: Growing But Slowing. 33rd Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/ PIP_Broadband.TPRC_Sept05.pdf
24. Intel (no date). Most Unwired City Survey. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005 from http://www.intel.com/personal/wireless/unwiredcities/
25. Internet World Statistics (March, 2006). Top Ten Languages Used in the Web. Retrieved May 31, 2006 from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7. htm.
26. Johnson, B. (2005). English grip on internet being eroded. Guardian Unlimited, Technology Blog, Tuesday Aug. 16, 2005. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005. http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/2005/08/16/ english_grip_on_internet_being_eroded.html
27. Katz, J. E. and Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement and expression. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Kling, R. (1999). "Can the 'next-generation' Internet effectively support 'ordinary citizens'?" The Information Society, 15(1), 57-64.
29. Lenhart, A., Horrigan, J., Rainie, L., Allen, K., Boyce, A., Madden, M. and O'Grady, E. (2003). The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look at Internet Access and the Digital Divide. Retreived Dec. 23, 2005 from: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Shifting_N et_Pop_Report.pdf
30. Madden, M. (Dec. 22, 2003). America's Online Pursuits. The Changing Picture of Who's Online And What They Do. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved May 28, 2006 from: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/ PIP_Online_Pursuits_Final.PDF
31. National School Board Federation (March 28, 2000). Safe & Smart: Research and Guidelines for Children's Use of the Internet. Retrieved January 14, 2006 fromt: http://www.nsbf.org/safe-smart/full-report.htm
32. National Center for Academic Transformation (NCAT) (2005). "Information Technology: A problem or solution for underserved students." Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005 from: www.thencat.org/Newsletters/Oct05. htm#1
33. Nie N. H. (2001). "Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings." American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420-435.
34. Nie, N. H. and Erbring, L. (Feb. 17, 2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society (SIQSS), Stanford University, and InterSurvey Inc. Available at http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/
35. Howard, P. and Jones, S. (2003). (Eds.) Society Online: The Internet in Context. Sage.
36. Howard, P., Rainie, L. and Jones, S. (2002). "Days and nights on the Internet", in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet In Everyday Life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 45-73.
37. Cole, J.I., Suman, M., Schramm, P., van Bel, D., Lunn, B., Maguire, P., Hanson, K., Singh, R., and Aquino, J-S. (2000). The UCLA Internet report: "Surveying the digital future". Retrieved May 31, 2006 from: http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/InternetReportYearOne.pdf
38. NTIA (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce. Available online at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/.
39. NTIA (2002). A Nation Online: How Americans are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. US Department of Commerce.
40. Nua (2001). US No Longer Dominates the Net. Available online at: http://www.nua.ie/surveys/index.cgi?f=VS&art_id=905356771&rel=true
41. Nua (2003). Forrester Research: One in five european seniors online. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2006 from http://www.nua.com/surveys/index.cgi?f= VS&art_id=905358750&rel=true.
42. Nua (2005). How Many Online. http://www.nua.com/surveys/ how_many_online/europe.html
43. Livingstone, S. and Bober, M. (2005). UK Children Go Online: Final Report of Key Project Findings. Economic and Social Research Council: UK. Retrieved January 16, 2006 from: http://news.bbc.co.Uk/1/sharedftsp/hi/pdfs/ 28_04_05_child renonline.pdf
44. Orlikowski, W.J. (2002). "Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing." Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273.
45. Paolillo, J. Pimienta, D., Prado, D. et al. (2005). Measuring Linguistic Diversity on the Internet. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO. Retrieved May 26, 2006 from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001421/142186e.pdf
46. Patterson, R. and Wilson, E. J. III (2000). "New IT and Social Inequity: Resetting the research and policy agenda." The Information Society, 16, 77-86.
47. st Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA, April 24-28, 2000. Retrieved, Dec. 28, 2005 from: http://llk.media.mit.edu/papers/ archive/aera2000.pdf
48. Pew Internet and American Life Project (Dec. 8, 2005). Data Update. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005 from: http://www.pewinternet.org/ pipcomments.asp?m=12&y=2005
49. Rainie, L., Fox, S., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A. and Spooner, T. (May 10, 2000). Tracking Online Life: How Women Use the Internet to Cultivate Relationships with Family and Friends. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005 from: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Reportl.pdf
50. Boneva, B. and Kraut, R. (2002). "Email, Gender and Personal Relationships", in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet In Everyday Life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 372-403.
51. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
52. Statistics Canada (2000). "Plugging in: Household Internet use." The Daily. Monday, December 4, 2000. Available online at: http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/001204/d001204a.htm
53. Stanley, L. D. (2003). "Beyond access: Psychosocial barriers to computer literacy." The Information Society, 19 (5), 407-416.
54. Today Translations (2005). Language Usage on the Internet. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2006 from: http://www.todaytranslations.com/index.asp-Q-Page- E-Language-Usage-on-the - Internet-99144709.
55. van Dijk, J. and Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315-326.
56. Warschauer, M. (2002). "Reconceptionalizing the digital divide." First Monday, 7(1), 1-15. http://firstmonday.org/issues/ issue7_7/warschauer/index.html
57. Warschauer, M. (2003a). Technology and Social Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Warschauer, M. (2003b). "Dissecting the "Digital Divide": A case study in Egypt." The Information Society, 19, 297-304.
59. Wired News (October 17, 2005). Wi-.Fi Cloud Covers Rural Oregon. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2005 from http://www.wired.eom/news/wireless/0,1382,69234,00. htm 1
60. Nicholas, K. (2003). "Geo-policy barriers and rural internet access: the regulatory role in constructing the digital divide." The Information Society 19 (4), 287-295.
61. Wilhelm, A.G. (2003). "Leveraging sunken investments in communications infrastructure: A policy perspective from the United States." The Information Society, 19(4), 279-286.
62. Rice, R.E. (2002). "Primary issues in Internet use: Access, civic and community involvement, and social interaction and expression", in L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of New Media. London, UK: Sage. pp. 105-129.
63. Hargittai, E. and Shafer, S. (2006). "Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender." Social Science Quarterly 87 (2), 432-448.