-
1
-
-
85120129341
-
-
Rosai J. Borderline epitheliallesions of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15:209-21.
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
85120115688
-
-
Balu-Maestro C, Ettore F,Chapellier C et al. Quand se méfier des résultatsdes micro et macrobiopsies guidées mammaires ?J Radiol 2006;87:265-73.
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
85120106086
-
-
e éditionaméricaine, 2004. American College of Radiology (ACR).ACR-BI-RADS — Mammography. In: ACR Breast imaging reportingand data sytem, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, Va: American Collegeof Radiology, 2003.
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
85120102117
-
-
Travade A, Isnard A, BagardC et al. Macrobiopsies stéréotaxiques par système à aspiration11-G. À propos de 249 patientes. J Radiol 2002;83:1063-71.
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
85120118761
-
-
Heywang-Kobrunner SH, SchaumloffelU, Viehweg P et al. Minimally invasive stereotactic vacuum corebreast biopsy. Eur Radiol 1998;8:377-85.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
85120121006
-
-
Jackman RJ, Burbank F, ParkerSH, Evans WP 3rd, Lechner MC, Richardson TR et al. Stereotacticbreast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinomain situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001;218:497-502.
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
85120143309
-
-
Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, IkedaDM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Can some lesion be defined as probablybenign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminatingrecommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002;224:548-54.
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
85120142693
-
-
Adrales G, Turk P, WallaceT et al. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical hyperplasiaof the breast diagnosed by mammotome? Am J Surg 2000;180:313-15.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
85120146235
-
-
® 11 G :faut-il opérer après diagnostic d’hyperplasiecanalaire atypique J Radiol 2006;87:307-10.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
85120128525
-
-
Darling ML, Smith DN, LesterSC, Kaelin C, Selland DL, Denison CM et al. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasiaand Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle BreastBiopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1341-6.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
85120142153
-
-
Renshaw AA, Cartagena N,Schenkman RH, Derhagopian RP, Gould EW. Atypical ductal hyperplasiain breast core needle biopsies. Correlation of size of the lesion,complete removal of the lesion, and the incidence of carcinoma infollow-up biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:92-6.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
85120119559
-
-
Bouté V, Baille-BarelleD, Denoux Y et al. Macrobiopsies assistées par le vide :expérience du CRLCC François Baclesse de Caen.J Radiol 2006;87:375-81.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
85120131216
-
-
Plantade R, Gerard F, HammouJC. Les tumeurs papillaires non malignes du sein : quelleprise en charge après diagnostic percutané ?J Radiol 2006;87:299-305.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
85120145603
-
-
Liberman L, Dershaw DD, RosenPP et al. Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesionsat stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1998;206:711-715.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
85120106187
-
-
Diebold T, Hahn T, SolbachC et al. Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breastbiopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings(BI-RADS IV). Invest Radiol 2005;40:465-71.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
85120105561
-
-
Schnitt SJ, Connoly JL, TavassoliFA et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductalproliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J SurgPathol 1992;16:1133-43.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
85120108232
-
-
Ely KA, Carter BA, JensenRA et al. Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia:a probabilistic approach to reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:1017-21.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
85120109556
-
-
Sneige N, Lim SC, WhitmanGJ et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis by directional vacuum-assistedstereotactic biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Considerationsfor surgical excision. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;119:248-253.
-
-
-
|