A parametric investigation of state-space-based prediction error methods with stochastic excitation for structural health monitoring

Smart Materials and Structures

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1621-1638

  Overbey, L A ^a   Olson, C C ^a   Todd, M D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RANDOM PROCESSES; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

STOCHASTIC EXCITATION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

ERROR ANALYSIS;

EID: 39749167025     PISSN: 09641726     EISSN: 1361665X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Doebling S W, Farrar C R and Prime M B 1998 A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods Shock Vib. Dig. 205 631-45
2. Doebling S W, Farrar C R, Prime M B and Shevitz D W 1996 Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13070-MS
3. Stubbs N, Sikorsky C, Park S C and Bolton R 2000 Verification of a methodology to nondestructively evaluate the structural properties of bridges Structural Health Monitoring 2000 (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univerisity) pp440-9
4. Pandey A K and Biswas M 1994 Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility J. Sound Vib. 169 3-17
5. Sampaio R P, Maia N M M and Silva J M M 1999 Damage detection using the frequency-response-function curvature method J. Sound Vib. 226 1029-42
6. Sohn H and Law K H 1999 Extraction of Ritz vectors and application to structural damage diagnosis 5th US National Congress on Computational Mechanics (Boulder, CO)
7. Norris M A and Meirovitch L 1989 On the problem of modeling for parameter identification in distributed structures Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 28 2451-63
8. Wang W J, Wu Z T and Chen J 2000 Fault identification in rotating machinery using the correlation dimension and bispectra Nonlinear Dyn. 25 383-93
9. Hou Z, Noori M and Amand R S 2000 Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection J. Eng. Mech. 126 677-83
10. Bishop C M 1994 Novelty detection and neural network validation IEEE Proc. Vis. Image Spectral Process. 141 217-22
11. Sohn H, Farrar C R, Hunter N F and Worden K 2001 Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 123 706-11
12. Nichols J M, Todd M D and Wait J R 2003 Using state space predictive modeling with chaotic interrogation in detecting joint preload loss in a frame structure experiment Smart Mater. Struct. 12 580-601
13. Todd M D, Erickson K, Chang L, Lee K and Nichols J M 2004 Using chaotic interrogation and attractor nonlinear cross-prediction error to detect fastener preload loss in an aluminum frame Chaos 14 387-99
14. Todd M D, Nichols J M, Pecora L M and Virgin L N 2001 Vibration-based damage assessment utilizing state space geometry changes: local attractor variance ratio Smart Mater. Struct. 10 1000-8
15. Nichols J M, Nichols C J, Todd M D, Seaver M, Trickey S T and Virgin L N 2004 Use of data driven phase space models in assessing the strength of a bolted connection in a composite beam Smart Mater. Struct. 13 241-50
16. Nichols J M 2003 Structural health monitoring of offshore structures using ambient excitation Appl. Ocean Res. 25 101-14
17. Todd M D, Overbey L A, Olson C C and Fasel T R 2004 Comparing deterministic and band-limited stochastic excitation with state space models to assess frame joint integrity 3rd Int. Conf. on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (Seoul, Korea, Sept. 2004)
18. Rapp P E, Albano A M, Schma T I and Farwell L A 1993 Filtered noise can mimic low-dimensional chaotic attractors Phys. Rev. E 47 2289-97
19. Cencini M, Falcioni M, Olbrich E, Kantz H and Vulpiani A 2000 Chaos or noise: difficulties of a distinction Phys. Rev. E 62 427-37
20. Stone L 1992 Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos? Proc. R. Soc. B 250 77-81
21. Takens F 1981 Detecting strange attractors in turbulence Dynamical Systems and Turbulence (Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol 898) ed D Rand and L S Young (New York: Springer) pp366-81
22. Stark J 2000 Observing complexity, seeing simplicity Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 358 41-61
23. Abarbanel H D I 1996 Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data (New York: Springer)
24. Fraser A M and Swinney H L 1986 Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information Phys. Rev. 33 1134-40
25. Broomhead D S and King G P 1986 Extracting qualitative dynamics from experimental data Physica D 20 217-36
26. Kennel M B and Abarbanel H D I 1992 Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction Phys. Rev. A 45 3403-11
27. Kantz H and Schreiber T 2004 Nonlinear Time Series Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
28. Theiler J 1986 Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data Phys. Rev. A 34 2427
29. Pecora L M and Carroll T L 1996 Discontinuous and nondifferentiable functions and dimension increase reduced by filtering chaotic data Chaos 6 432-9
30. Olson C C, Overbey L A and Todd M D 2005 A comparison of state-space attractor features in structural health monitoring Proc. Int. Modal Analysis Conf. XXIII (Orlando, FL, Feb. 2005)
31. Olson C C, Overbey L A and Todd M D 2005 Sensitivity and computational comparison of state-space methods for structural health monitoring Proc. SPIE 5768 241-52
32. Overbey L A and Todd M D 2007 Analysis of local state space models for feature extraction in structural health monitoring Struct. Health Monit. 6 145-72
33. Olson C C and Todd M D 2007 Improving excitations for active sensing in structural health monitoring via evolutionary algorithms J. Vib. Acoust. 129 1-20