Safety of prolonged sacral neuromodulation tined lead testing

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 343-347

  Kessler, Thomas M ^a   Burkhard, Fiona C ^a   Madersbacher, Helmut ^b   Kofler, Alexandra ^b   Poewe, Werner ^b   Kiss, Gustav ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Complication; Prolonged testing; Sacral neuromodulation; Tined lead

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; NEUROMODULATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; PULSE GENERATOR; SACRAL NEUROMODULATION; SACRAL SPINAL CORD; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION; URGE INCONTINENCE; URINARY FREQUENCY; URINE RETENTION; UROLOGIC EXAMINATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SACRUM; SAFETY; TIME FACTORS; UROLOGIC DISEASES;

EID: 39749153486     PISSN: 03007995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1185/030079908X253555     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kessler TM, Buchser E, Meyer S, et al. Sacral neuromodulation for refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction: results of a nationwide registry in Switzerland. Eur Urol 2007;51: 1357-63
2. Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M, et al. New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 2003;170:1905-7
3. Spinelli M, Weil E, Ostardo E, et al. New tined lead electrode in sacral neuromodulation: experience from a multicentre European study. World J Urol 2005;23:225-9
4. Hijaz A, Vasavada S. Complications and troubleshooting of sacral neuromodulation therapy. Urol Clin North Am 2005;32:65-9
5. Seif C, Bannowsky A, Wefer B, et al. Use of permanent electrodes in the peripheral nerve evaluation test (PNE-test) in comparison to conventional wire electrodes. Aktuelle Urol 2006;37:277-80
6. van Voskuilen AC, Oerlemans DJ, Weil EH, et al. Medium-term experience of sacral neuromodulation by tined lead implantation. BJU Int 2007;99:107-10 [Epub ahead of print 6 Sep 2006]
7. Kessler TM, Madersbacher H, Kiss G. Prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing using permanent leads: a more reliable patient selection method? Eur Urol 2005;47:660-5
8. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167-78
9. Siegel SW, Catanzaro F, Dijkema HE, et al. Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention. Urology 2000;56(Suppl 1):87-91
10. Comiter CV. Sacral neuromodulation for the symptomatic treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis: a prospective study. J Urol 2003;169:1369-73
11. Malaguti S, Spinelli M, Giardiello G, et al. Neurophysiological evidence may predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation. J Urol 2003;170(Pt 1):2323-6
12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13
13. Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA. Bladder pacemaker: scientific basis and clinical future. Urology 1982;20:614-9
14. Meglio M, Cioni B, Rossi GF. Spinal cord stimulation in management of chronic pain. A 9-year experience. J Neurosurg 1989;70:519-24
15. Barolat G. Current status of epidural spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurg Q 1995;5:98-124
16. Janknegt RA, Weil EH, Eerdmans PH. Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: two-stage implant. Urology 1997;49:358-62
17. Johnson MR, Tomes DJ, Treves JS, et al. Minimally invasive implantation of epidural spinal cord neurostimulator electrodes by using a tubular retractor system. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2004;100:1119-21
18. Beems T, van Dongen RT. Use of a tubular retractor system as a minimally invasive technique for epidural plate electrode placement under local anesthesia for spinal cord stimulation: technical note. Neurosurgery 2006;58(Suppl):ONS- E177
19. Hijaz A, Vasavada SP, Daneshgari F, et al. Complications and troubleshooting of two-stage sacral neuromodulation therapy: a single-institution experience. Urology 2006;68:533-7
20. Everaert K, Kerckhaert W, Caluwaerts H, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation. Eur Urol 2004;45:649-54
21. Pannek J, Grigoleit U, Hinkel A. Bacterial contamination of test stimulation leads during percutaneous nerve stimulation. Urology 2005;65:1096-8
22. Jonas U, Van den Hombergh U. Complications of sacral nerve stimulation. In: Jonas U, Grünewald V, editors. New perspectives in sacral nerve stimulation for control of lower urinary tract dysfunction. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd.; 2002, pp.183-96
23. North RB, Wetzel FT. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of spinal origin: a valuable long-term solution. Spine 2002;27:2584-91; discussion 92