Territorialisation processes in fisheries management

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 259-271

  González Laxe, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS;

FISHERIES LEGISLATION; FISHING FLEETS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

FISHERIES;

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; EXPLOITATION; FISHERY PRODUCTION; FISHERY REGULATION; FISHING INDUSTRY; FISHING VESSEL; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TERRITORIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 39749141596     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. FAO. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura (SOFIA). Roma; 2004.
2. Grieve Ch. Reviewing the common fisheries policy. EU fisheries management for the 21st century (2001), Institute for European Environmental Policy, London
3. González-Laxe F. In: Coruña N.A. (Ed). Desarrollo y estrategias de la pesca europea (2002), Instituto Universitario Estudios Marítimos
4. Gray T., and Hatchard J. The 2002 reform of the common fisheries policy's system of governance - rhetoric or reality?. Marine Policy 27 (2003) 545-554
5. Russ G., and Zeller D.C. From Mare Liberum to Mare Reservarum. Marine Policy 27 (2003) 75-78
6. Cole H. Contemporary challenges: globalisation, global interconnectedness and that there are not plenty more fish in the sea. Fisheries, governance and globalisation: is there a relationship?. Ocean & Coastal Management 46 (2003) 73-102
7. Charles-Le Bihan D. L'Europe Bleue et la gestion de les ressources: une crise de legitimité. Espaces et Ressources Maritimes 11 (1997) 173-186
8. Lequesne Ch. L'Europe Bleue. A quoi sert une politique communautaire de la pêche? (2001), Presses de Sciences Po, Paris
9. Caddy J.F., and Cochrane K.L. A review of fisheries management past and present and some future perspective for the third millennium. Ocean & Coastal Management 44 (2001) 653-682
10. FAO. Precautionary approach to fisheries. FAO fisheries technical paper 350, Rome; 1995.
11. Caddy JF, Mahon R. Reference points for fisheries management. FAO fisheries technical paper 347, Rome; 1995.
12. Caddy JF, Griffith RC. Living marine resource and their sustainable development. FAO fisheries technical paper 353, Rome; 1995.
13. FAO. Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. Rome; 1995.
14. FAO. Reykjavik conference on responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystems. Reykjavik; 1-4 October, 2001.
15. Charles A.T. Fishery conflicts: a unified framework. Marine Policy 16 (1992) 379-393
16. Boncouer J, Mesnil B. Sur-exploitation des stocks et conflicts dans le secteur de pêches - Une discussion du Triangle des Paradigmes d'Anthony Charles dans le contexte européen. Information et Commentaires, 107; 10-17 avril-juin 1999.
17. Schmidt CC. Fisheries and Japan: a case of multiples roles? In: International symposium of multiples roles and functions of fisheries communities. Aomori, Japan; 13 February 2003.
18. Labat B. Le concept chilien de mer présencielle et ses conséquences sur le régimen de la pêche dans la partie de la haute mer adjacente à la limite des 200 milles marines. Annuaire du Droit de la Mer Partie II (1997) 29-52
19. Orrego Vicuña F. The "presential sea" - defining coastal states' special interests in high seas fisheries and other activities. German Yearbook of International Law 35 (1993) 264-292
20. Hersoug B. Policy coherence in fisheries and aquaculture: possibilities and constraints. In: Policy coherence for development in fisheries. Paris: OCDE; 13 April 2005.
21. Clark L. Perspectives on fisheries access agreements: developing country view. In: Policy coherence for development in fisheries. Paris: OCDE; 13 April 2005.
22. Donatella F. The EC fisheries agreements and how the coherence principles are applied: reforms, consequences, perspectives and challenges. In: Policy coherence for development in fisheries. Paris: OCDE; 13 April 2005.
23. Frost H., and Lindebo E. Alternative management systems in EU fisheries (2003), Fodevareokonomisk Institut, Copenhagen
24. Lindebo E, Frost H, Lokkegaard J. Common fisheries policy reform: a new fleet capacity policy. Rapport no°. 141. Copenhagen: Fodevarekonomisk Institut; 2002.
25. Flaesch-Mougin C., Charles-Le Bihan D., and Lequesne C. La politique européenne de la pêche: vers un développement durable? (2003), Ed Apogée, Rennes
26. Koers A. International regulations of marine fisheries: a study of regional fisheries organizations (1973), Fishing News Books, London
27. Garcia S.M., and Hayashi M. Division of the oceans and ecosystem management: a contrastive spatial evolution of marine fisheries governance. Ocean & Coastal Management 43 (2000) 445-474
28. Swan J. Summary information on the role of international fishery organizations or arrangements and other bodies concerned with the conservation and management of living aquatic resources. FAO fisheries circular 985, Rome; 2003.
29. Molenaar E.J. Regional fisheries management organizations: issues of participation, allocation and unregulated fishing. In: Oude Ellfering A.G., and Rothwell D.R. (Eds). Oceans management in the 21st century: institutional frameworks and responses (2004), Martines Nijhoff 69-86
30. Molenaar EJ. News areas and gaps - how to address them. In: Conference on the governance of high seas fisheries and the UN fish agreement, St. Johns, Newfoundland and Labrador; 1-5 May 2005.
31. Sydnes A.K. Regional fishery organizations: how and why organizational diversity matters. Ocean Development and International Law 32 (2001) 349-372
32. McDorman TL. Implementing existing tools: turning words into actions. In: Conference on the high seas fisheries and the UN fish agreement, St Johns, Newfoundland and Labrador; 1-5 May 2005.
33. Jentoft S. Fisheries co-management - delegating government responsibility to fishermen's organizations. Marine Policy 13 (1989) 137-154
34. Jentoft S., and McCay B. User participation in fisheries management - lessons drawn from international experiences. Marine Policy 19 (1995) 227-246