Data, disciplines, and scholarly publishing

Learned Publishing

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-38

  Borgman, Christine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749128391     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/095315108X254476     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (81)

1. Hey, T. and Trefethen, A. 2005. Cyberinfrastructure and e-Science. Science, 308: 818-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.l126/science.1110410
2. Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21st Century Discovery. Washington, DC, National Science Foundation, 2007. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/ (accessed 17 July 2007).
3. Borgman, C.L. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2007.
4. Atkins, D.E., Droegemeier, K.K., Feldman, S.I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M.L., Messina, P., Messerschmitt, D.G., Ostriker, J.P., and Wright, M.H. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Washington, DC, National Science Foundation, 2003. http://www.nsf.gov/cise/sci/ reports/atkins.pdf (accessed 18 September 2006).
5. E-resources for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences. A British Academy Policy Review. London, The British Academy, 2005. http://www.britac.ac.uk/ reports/eresources/ (accessed 30 September 2006).
6. ESRC National Center for e-Social Science. 2006. http://www.ncess.ac.uk/ (accessed 22 April 2006).
7. Unsworth, J., Courant, P, Fraser, S., Goodchild, M., Hedstrom, M., Henry, C., Kaufman, P.B., McGann, J., Rosenzweig, R., and Zuckerman, B. Our Cultural Commonwealth: The Report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for Humanities and Social Sciences. New York, American Council of Learned Societies, 2006. http://www.acls. org/cyberinfrastructure/cyber.htm (accessed 17 July 2007),
8. Bowker, G.C. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2005.
9. Hey, A.J.G. and Trefethen, A. The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective. In F. Berman, G. Fox, and A.J.G. Hey (eds), Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, Wiley: Chichester, 2003. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/ escience/documents/ report_datadeluge.pdf (accessed 20 January 2005).
10. Lynch, C.A. 2007. The shape of the scientific article in the developing cyberinfrastructure. CT Watch Quarterly, 3(3). http://www.ctwatch.org/ quarterly/ articles/2007/08/the-shape-of-the-scientific-article-in-the- developing-cyberinfrastructure/ (accessed 17 July 2007).
11. Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M.L., Lagoze, C, and Warner, S. 2004. Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework. D-Lib Magazine, 10(12). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december04/vandesompel/12 vandesompel.html (accessed 5 October 2006).
12. Object Reuse and Exchange. 2006. http://www.open archives.org/ore/ (accessed 15 November 2006).
13. Van de Sompel, H. and Lagoze, C. 2007. Interoperability for the discovery, use, and re-use of units of scholarly communication. CT Watch Quarterly, 3(3). http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/ 08/interoperability-for-the-discovery-use-and-re-use-of-units-of-scholarly- communication/ (accessed 17 July 2007).
14. OpenURL and CrossRef. 2006. http://www.crossref. org/02publishers/16openurl.html (accessed 3 Octobet 2006).
15. Chudnov, D., Cameron, R., Frumkin, J., Singer, R., and Yee, R. 2005. Opening up openURLs with autodiscovery. Ariadne, 43. http://www.ariadne. ac.uk/ issue43/chudnov/ (accessed 29 September 2006).
16. Hellman, E. 2003. OpenURL: making the link to libraries. Learned Publishing, 16(3): 177-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315103322110950
17. The Digital Object Identifier System. 2006. http://www. doi.org (accessed 5 October 2006).
18. Paskin, N. 2005. Digital object identifiers for scientific data. Data Science Journal, 4(1): 1-9.
19. CrossRef. 2006. http://www.crossref.org/index.html (accessed 26 July 2006).
20. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System. Recommendation for Space Data System Standards, 2002, pp. 1-9. http://public.ccsds.org/pub-lications/archive/650x0bl.pdf (accessed 4 October 2006).
21. Buckland, M.K. 1991. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5): 351-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4571(199106)4 2:5<351::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-3
22. Borgman, C.L., Wallis, J.C., and Enyedy, N. Building digital libtaries for scientific data: an exploratory study of data practices in habitat ecology. In J. Gonzalo, C. Thanos, M.F. Verdejo, and R.C. Carrasco (eds), 10th European Conference on Digital Libraries, Alicante, Spain. Berlin, Springer Verlag, 2006, pp. 170-83.
23. Borgman, C.L., Wallis, J.C., and Enyedy, N. 2007. Little Science confronts the data deluge: habitat ecology, embedded sensor networks, and digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries. http://www. sptingerlink.com/content/f7580437800m367m/ (accessed 29 September 2007).
24. Wallis, J.C., Borgman, C.L., Mayernik, M., Pepe, A., Ramanathan, N., and Hansen, M. Know thy sensor: trust, data quality, and data integrity in scientific digital libraries. In L. Kovacs, N. Fuhr, and C. Meghini (eds), 11th European Conference on Digital Libraries, Budapest, Hungary. LINCS 4675. Berlin, Springer Verlag, 2007, pp. 380-91.
25. Cox, J. and Cox, L. Scholarly Publishing Practice: The ALPSP Report on Academic Journal Publishers' Policies and Practices in Online Publishing. London, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 2003.
26. Garson, L.R. 2004. Communicating original research in chemistry and related sciences. Accounts of Chemical Research, 37(3): 141-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar0300017
27. Cox, J. and Cox, L. Scholarly Publishing Practice: Academic Publishers' Policies and Practices in Online Publishing. London, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 2005. http://www. alpsp.org/ngen_public/article.asp?id=200&did=47&aid=269&st= &oaid=-l (accessed 27 September 2007).
28. Scopus in Detail. 2006. http://www.info.scopus.com/ detail/what/ (accessed 31 March 2006).
29. Meadows, A.J. Communicating Research. San Diego, Academic Press, 1998.
30. Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. 2002. Reading behaviour and electronic journals. Learned Publishing, 15: 259-65. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1087/ 095315102760319215
31. Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers. Washington, DC, Special Libraries Association, 2000.
32. Cronin, B. The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and its Rewards. Lanham, MD, Scarecrow Press, 2005.
33. Anderson, C. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. New York, Hyperion, 2006.
34. Anderson, C. 2004. The long tail. Wired Magazine, 12(10). http://wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail_pr. html (accessed 17 September 2006).
35. Open Content Alliance. 2005. http://www.opencontent alliance.org/ (accessed 25 November 2005).
36. Crane, G. 2006. What do you do with a million books? D-Lib Magazine, 12(3). http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/march06/crane/03crane.html (accessed 17 August 2006).
37. Mass Digitization: Implications for Information Policy. Report from "Scholarship and Libraries in Transition: A Dialogue about the Impacts of Mass Digitization Projects", Symposium, University of Michigan, 2006. http://www.nclis.gov/digitization/MassDigitizationSymposium-Report.pdf (accessed 29 July 2006).
38. Sloan Digital Sky Survey. 2006. http://www.sdss.org/ (accessed 15 August 2006).
39. Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology. 2006. http://www.iris.edu (accessed 30 September 2006).
40. Protein Data Bank. 2006. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/ (accessed 4 October 2006).
41. Survey Research Center, UC-Berkeley. 2005. http:// srcweb.berkeley.edu/ (accessed 24 May 2005).
42. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research. 2006. http://www.isr.umich.edu/src/ (accessed 4 October 2006).
43. UK Data Archive. 2006. http://www.data-archive.ac. uk/about/about.asp (accessed 5 October 2006).
44. Berman, F. and Brady, H. Final Report: NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences. National Science Foundation, 2005. http://vis.sdsc.edu/sbe/reports/SBE-CISE-FINAL.pdf (accessed 30 April 2006).
45. Beazley Archive. 2006. http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/ Beazley Admin/Script2/TheArchive.htm (accessed 31 March 2006).
46. Perseus Digital Library. 2006. http://www.perseus.tufts. edu/ (accessed 22 April 2006).
47. Mahoney, A. 2002. Finding texts in Perseus. New England Classical Journal, 29(1): 32-34.
48. Arts and Humanities Data Service. 2006. http://www. ahds.ac.uk/ (accessed 28 September 2006).
49. Thompson, J.B. Books in the Digital Age. Cambridge, Polity, 2005.
50. Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(8): A12-A17.
51. Thelwall, M. 2006. Interpreting social science link analysis research: a theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(1): 60-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20253
52. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., and Bjorneborn, L. Webometrics. In B. Cronin (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Information Today, Medford, NJ, 2005, pp. 81-135.
53. Bollen, J. and Van de Sompel, H. 2008. Usage Impact Factor: the effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1) http://dx/doi.org/10.1002/asi.20746
54. Rodriguez, M.A., Bollen, J. and Van de Sompel, H. A practical ontology for the large-scale modeling of scholarly artefacts and their usage. JCDL '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Vancouver, BC, Association for Computing Machinery, 2007, 278-87.
55. Hamad, S. and Brody, T. 2004. Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). http://www. dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html (accessed 30 September 2006).
56. Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C, Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., and Murray, S.S. 2005. The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1395-1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.010
57. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature Web Debates. http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e- access/Arti-cles/lawrence.html (accessed 9 May 2005).
58. MacCallum, C.J. and Parthasarathy, H. 2006. Open access increases citation rate. PLoS Biology, 4(5): e176. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040176
59. Davis, P.M. and Fromerth, M.J. 2007. Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics, 71(2): 203-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/slll92-007-1661- 8
60. Antelman, K. 2004. Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5): 372-82. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002309/
61. The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. The Open Citation Project - Reference Linking and Citation Analysis for Open Archives, 2007. http://opcit. eprints.org/oacitation- biblio.html (accessed 27 September 2007).
62. Bailey, C. Open Access Bibliography: Liberating Scholarly Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals. Washington, DC, Association of Research Libraries, 2005. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/oab.pdf (accessed 28 September 2006).
63. The Facts about Open Access: A Study of the Financial and Non-Financial Effects of Alternative Business Models on Scholarly Journals. Kaufman-Wills Group LLC. Worthing, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 2005. http://sippi.aaas.org/Pubs/ FAOAcompleteREV.pdf (accessed 27 September 2007).
64. Craig, I.D., Plume, A.M., McVeigh, M.E., Pringle, J. and Amin, M. 2007. Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1: 239-48. http://dx.doi.org/l0. 1016/j .joi.2007.04-001
65. Publishing Research Consortium. http://www.publishing research.net/Citations.htm (accessed 12 November 2007).
66. Publishing Research Consortium. http://www.publishing research.net/index.html (accessed 12 November 2007).
67. Borgman, C.L. (ed.) Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990,.
68. Case, D.O. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior, 2nd edn. San Diego, Academic Press, 2006.
69. Nelson, R.R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67: 323-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ 258177
70. Dasgupta, P. and David, PA. 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5): 487-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94) 01002-l
71. David, P.A. (2003). The economic logic of 'open science' and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information: a primer, in The Role of the Public Domain in Scientific Data and Information, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, pp. 19-34. http://siepr.stan-ford.edu/papers/pdf/02-30.html (accessed 30 September 2006).
72. CODATA-CENDI Forum on the National Science Board Report on Long-Lived Digital Data Collections. 2005. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/usnc- codata/Forum_on_NSB_Report.pdf (accessed 29 September 2006).
73. Long-Lived Digital Data Collections. 2005. http://www. nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2005/LLDDC_report.pdf (accessed 1 October 2006)
74. Esanu, J.M. and Uhlir, RE (eds). Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science: Proceedings of an International Symposium. US National Committee for CODATA, Board on International Scientific Organizations, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council. National Academies, Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 2004. http://books.nap.edu/catalog/ 11030.html (accessed 30 September 2006).
75. Uhlir, P.F. The emerging role of open repositories as a fundamental component of the public research infrastructure. In G. Sica (ed.), Open Access: Open Problems. Monza, Polimetrica, 2006.
76. Science Commons. 2006. http://sciencecommons.org/ about/index.html (accessed 6 October 2006).
77. Burk, D.L. Bioinformatics lessons from the open source movement. In H. Tavani (ed.), Ethics, Computing, and Genomics: Moral Controversies in Computational Genomics. Sudbury, MA, Jones and Bartlett, 2005, pp. 257-254.
78. Lyon, L. Dealing with data: roles, rights, responsibilities, and relationships. Bath, UKOLN, 2007. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/ program me_digital_repositories/project_dealing_with_data. aspx (accessed 23 July 2007).
79. Hodge, G. and Frangakis, E. Digital Preservation and Permanent Access to Scientific Information: The State of the Practice. Washington, DC, The International Council for Scientific and Technical Information (ICSTI) and CENDI: US Federal Information Managers Group, 2005, p. 84. http://cendi.dtic. mil/publica-tions/04-3dig_preserv.html (accessed 30 September 2006).
80. Lord, P. and Macdonald, A. E-Science Curation Report - Data Curation for E-science in the UK: An Audit to Establish Requirements for Future Curation and Provision. JISC Committee for the Support of Research, 2003. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_doc-uments/e-scienceReportFinal.pdf (accessed 1 October 2006).
81. Murray-Rust, P., Rzepa, H.S., Tyrrell, S.M., and Zhang, Y. 2004. Representation and use of chemistry in the global electronic age. Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2(22): 3192-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b410732b