Impaction grafting with a bone-graft substitute in a sheep model of revision hip replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 246-253

  Coathup, M ^a   Smith, N ^a   Kingsley, C ^a   Buckland, T ^a   Dattani, R ^a   Ascroft, P ^a   Blunn, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; BONE TURNOVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; GROUND REACTION FORCE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEEP; THICKNESS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOGENESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SHEEP; TETRACYCLINE;

EID: 39749114469     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.19675     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Dixon T, Shaw M, Ebrahim S, Dieppe P. Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:825-30.
2. Clohisy J, Calvert G, Tull F, McDonald D, Maloney W. Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop 2004;429:188-92.
3. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop 2004;429:227-31.
4. Toms AD, Barker RL, Jones RS, Kuiper JH. Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:2050-60.
5. Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:574-9.
6. Pratt JN, Griffon DJ, Dunlop DG, Smith N, Howie CR. Impaction grafting with morsellised allograft and tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite: incorporation within ovine metaphyseal bone defects. Biomaterials 2002;23:3309-17.
7. Silva R, Camilli JA, Bertran CA, Moreira NH. The use of hydroxyapatite and autogenous cancellous bone grafts to repair bone defects in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:178-84.
8. No authors listed. Home office. The animals (scientific procedures) act 1986. http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/hoc/ 321/321-xa.htm (date last accessed 11 January 2008).
9. Goel VK, Drinker H, Panjabi MM, Strongwater A. Selection of an animal model for implant fixation studies: anatomical aspects. Yale J Biol Med 1982;55:113-22.
10. Eitel F, Klapp F, Jacobson W, Schweiberer L. Bone regeneration in animals and in man: a contribution to understanding the relative value of animal experiments to human pathophysiology. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1981;99:59-64.
11. Frei H, Mitchell P, Masri BA, Duncan C, Oxland TP. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting. J Orthop Res 2005;23:9-17.
12. Dai KR, Liu YK, Park JB, et al. Bone-particle-impregnated bone cement: an in vivo weight-bearing study. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:141-56.
13. Kwon SY, Kim YS, Woo YK, Kim SS, Park JB. Hydroxyapatite impregnated bone cement: in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7:129-40.
14. Munro NA, Downing MR, Meakin JR, Lee AJ, Ashcroft P. A hydroxyapatite graft substitute reduces subsidence in a femoral impaction grafting model. Clin Orthop 2007;455:246-52.
15. Berzins A, Sumner DR, Wasielewski RC, Galante JO. Impacted particulate allograft for femoral revision total hip arthroplasty: in vitro mechanical stability and effects of cement pressurisation. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:500-6.
16. Frei H, O'Connell J, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Oxland TR. Biological and mechanical changes of the bone graft-cement interface after impaction allografting. J Orthop Res 2005;23:1271-9.
17. de Waal Malefijt J, Sloof TJ, Huiskes R, de Laat EA, Barensz JO. Vascular changes following hip arthroplasty: the femur in goats studied with and without cementation. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:643-9.
18. Virolainen P, Heikkilä J, Yli-Urpo A, Vuorio E, Aro HT. Histomorphometric and molecular biologic comparison of bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone grafts in augmentation of bone defect healing. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:9-17.
19. Moore DC, Chapman MW, Manske D. The evaluation of a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic for use in grafting long-bone diaphyseal defects. J Orthop Res 1987;5:356-65.
20. Dattani R, Blunn G. Revision of the femoral prosthesis with impaction allografting. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73:558-65.
21. Verdonschot N, Van Hal CT, Schreurs BW, et al. Time-dependent mechanical properties of HA/TCP particles in relation to morsellized bone grafts for use in impaction grafting. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:599-604.
22. Malkani AL, Voor MK, Fee KA, Bates CS. Femoral component revision using impacted morcellised cancellous bone graft: a biomechanical study of implant stability. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:973.
23. Van Der Donk S, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW. Effect of load on the early incorporation of impacted morsellised allografts. Biomaterials 2002;23:297-303.
24. Wang JS, Tägil M, Aspenberg P. Load-bearing increases new bone formation in impacted and morsellised allografts. Clin Orthop 2000;378:274-81.
25. Lawes P, Buckland T. Mechanical stability of simulated impaction grafts. Engineers and surgeons joined at the hip. IMechE June 2002, London, UK.