de Haas van Alphen effect in heavy fermion compounds-effective mass and non-Fermi-liquid behaviour

Physica B: Condensed Matter

Volumn 403, Issue 5-9, 2008, Pages 717-720

  McCollam, A ^a   Xia, J S ^b   Flouquet, J ^c   Aoki, D ^c   Julian, S R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CEA GRENOBLE   (France)

Author keywords

de Haas van Alphen; Heavy fermions; Non Fermi liquid; Quantum oscillations

Indexed keywords

FERMI LIQUIDS; LOW TEMPERATURE EFFECTS; QUANTUM THEORY; TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION;

HEAVY FERMIONS; QUANTUM OSCILLATIONS;

FERMIONS;

EID: 39749110690     PISSN: 09214526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2007.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Taillefer L., Newbury R., Lonzarich G.G., Fisk Z., and Smith J.L. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 63 & 64 (1987) 372
2. Araki S., Settai R., Kobayashi T.C., Harima H., and Onuki Y. Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001) 224417
3. e.g., D. Shoenberg in: Magnetic Oscillations in Metals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.
4. Onuki Y., Settai R., Sugiyama K., Takeuchi T., Kobayashi T.C., Haga Y., and Yamamoto E. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 73 (2004) 769
5. Onuki Y., Settai R., Shishido H., Kubo T., Yasuda Y., Betsuyaku K., and Harima H. J. Alloys Comp. 408-412 (2006) 27
6. Wasserman A., and Springford M. Adv. Phys. 45 (1996) 471 and references therein
7. We ignore the dependence of energy on wave-vector parallel to the applied field, equivalent to working in a two-dimensional electron system. This saves a considerable amount of complexity, but still leads to the central result, Eq. (7).
8. c is really just a short-hand for this quantisation. So provided that the k-dependence of the self-energy can be ignored this is valid.
9. k and the dHvA frequency F.
10. Bychkov Yu.A., and Gor'kov L.P. JETP 14 (1962) 1132
11. Lonzarich G.G. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 76 & 77 (1988) 1
12. Ebihara T., Harrison N., Jaime M., Uji S., and Lashley J.C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 246401
13. Wasserman A., Springford M., and Han F. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3 (1991) 5335
14. Millis A.J. Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 7183
15. Abanov A., Chubukov A.V., and Schmalian J. Adv. Phys. 52 (2003) 119
16. Paglione J., Tanatar M.A., Hawthorn D.G., Boaknin E., Hill R.W., Ronning F., Sutherland M., Taillefer L., Petrovich C., and Canfield P.C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 246405
17. Bianchi A., Movshovich R., Vekhter I., Pagliuso P.G., and Sarrao J.L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 257001
18. Kim J.S., Alwood J., Stewart G.R., Sarrao J.L., and Thompson J.D. Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001) 134524
19. McCollam A., Julian S.R., Rourke P.M.C., Aoki D., and Flouquet J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 186401
20. In reality the Dingle factor and other pre-factors (see e.g. Ref. [3]) enter the amplitude, so absolute amplitudes cannot be directly compared on different orbits-the point is that strong non-Fermi-liquid behaviour can suppress oscillations to below the measurement threshold.