Cytologic findings after fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy

Cancer

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-6

  Feratovic, Rusmir ^a   Lewin, Sharyn N ^a   Sonoda, Yukio ^a   Park, Kay J ^a   Abu Rustum, Nadeem R ^a   Moreira, Andre L ^a   Lin, Oscar ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytology; Endometrial cells; Endometrial stromal cells; Trachelectomy

Indexed keywords

ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM BIOPSY; ENDOMETRIUM CELL; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL TRACHELECTOMY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; STROMA CELL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE ENDOCERVIX; VAGINA CYTOLOGY;

ADULT; CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINA;

EID: 39749107946     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23256     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Aburel E. [Proceedings: Extended abdominal exstirpation of cervix and isthmus in early stages of cervix carcinoma (carcinoma in situ and microcarcinoma)] [in German]. Arch Gynakol. 1973;214:106-108.
2. Dargent D, Mathevet P. Schauta's vaginal hysterectomy combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;9:691-705.
3. Roy M, Plante M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 pt 1):1491-1496.
4. Plante M, Renaud MC, Francois H, Roy M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:614-623.
5. Martin XJ, Golfier F, Romestaing P, Raudrant D. First case of pregnancy after radical trachelectomy and pelvic irradiation. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74:286-287.
6. Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
7. Singh N, Titmuss E, Chin Aleong J, et al. A review of post-trachelectomy isthmic and vaginal smear cytology. Cytopathology. 2004;15:97-103.
8. DeMay RM. Hyperchromatic crowded groups: pitfalls in pap smear diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114(suppl):S36-S43.
9. de Peralta-Venturino MN, Purslow MJ, Kini SR. Endometrial cells of the "lower uterine segment" (LUS) in cervical smears obtained by endocervical brushings: a source of potential diagnostic pitfall. Diagn Cytopathol. 1995;12:263-268; discussion 268-271.
10. Ducatman BS, Wang HH, Jonasson JG, Hogan CL, Antonioli DA. Tubal metaplasia: a cytologic study with comparison to other neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions of the endocervix. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:98-103; discussion 103-105.
11. Hirschowitz L, Eckford SD, Phillpotts B, Midwinter A. Cytological changes associated with tubo-endometrioid metaplasia of the uterine cervix. Cytopathology. 1994;5:1-8.
12. Selvaggi SM, Haefner HK. Microglandular endocervical hyperplasia and tubal metaplasia: pitfalls in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;16:168-173.