Separated by a common language? Entrepreneurship research across the atlantic

Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 249-266

  Brush, Candida G ^a,b   Manolova, Tatiana S ^c   Edelman, Linda F ^c  

^a Department of Entrepreneurship ^*

^b BABSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749106616     PISSN: 10422587     EISSN: 15406520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00225.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Aldrich, H. (1992). Method in our madness? Trends in entrepreneurship research. In D.L. Sexton & J.D. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art in entrepreneurship research (pp. 171-213). Boston: PWS-Kent.
2. Aldrich, H. & Baker, T. (1997). Blinded by the cites? Has there been progress in entrepreneurship research? In D.L. Sexton & R.W. Smilor (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000 (pp. 377-400). Chicago: Upstart Publishing.
3. Aldrich, H. & Martinez, M.A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41-56.
4. Astley, W.G. & Van de Ven, A.H. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organizational theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 245-273.
5. Brush, C.G., Duhaime, I., Gartner, W., Stewart, A., Katz, J., Hitt, M.A., et al. (2003). Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 309-331.
6. Brush, C.G. & VanderWerf, P. (1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 157-170.
7. Busenitz, L.W., West, G.P., III, Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N., & Zachakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308.
8. Chandler, G. & Lyon, D. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 101-113.
9. Connolly, T., Conlon, E., & Deutsch, S. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 211-217.
10. Daft, R. & Lewin, A.Y. (1990). Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straightjacket? Organization Science, 1(1), 1-9.
11. Dailey, C.M., McDougall, P.P., Covin, J.G., & Dalton, D. (2002). Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management, 28(3), 387-412.
12. Davidsson, P., Low, M.B., & Wright, M. (2001). Editor's introduction: Low and MacMillan tens years on: Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 5-16.
13. Davidsson, P. & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81-100.
14. Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. London: The Free Press.
15. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(5), 532-550.
16. Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Fichman, R. (1992). Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. Working paper, MIT.
18. Gartner, W. (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 27-40.
19. Hagstrom, W.O. (1965). The scientific community. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
20. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Hoy, F. (1997). Relevance in entrepreneurship research. In D.L. Sexton & R.W. Smilor (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000 (pp. 361-376). Chicago, IL: Upstart Publishing.
22. Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.
23. Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler.
24. Katz, J. & Gartner, W.B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429-441.
25. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Low, M. (2001). The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: Specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 17-26.
27. Low, M. & MacMillan, I. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 35, 139-161.
28. Mone, M.A. & McKinley, W. (1993). The uniqueness value and its consequences for organization studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(3), 284-296.
29. Murphy, G.B., Trailer, J., & Hill, R. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15-23.
30. Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. Boston: Allyn Bacon.
31. Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243-263.
32. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
33. Sharma, P. & Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-27.
34. Thornhill, S. & Celly, N. (2006). What is the dependent variable in entrepreneurship research? Working Paper, University of Western Ontario.
35. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2001). The focus of entrepreneurial research: Contextual and process issues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 57-80.
36. VanderWerf, P. & Brush, C.G. (1989). Achieving progress in an undefined field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(2), 45-58.
37. Venkatraman, N. & Ramanunjam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 606-616.
38. Whetten, D. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495.
39. Yuchtman, E. & Seashore, S. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32(6), 891-903.