|
Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages
|
Which missing value imputation method to use in expression profiles: A comparative study and two selection schemes
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COMPARATIVE STUDIES;
COMPUTATIONAL COSTS;
CORRELATION PATTERNS;
GENE EXPRESSION DATA;
IMPUTATION ALGORITHM;
IMPUTATION METHODS;
MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS;
MISSING VALUE IMPUTATION;
AUTOCORRELATION;
ENTROPY;
EXPERIMENTS;
GENE EXPRESSION;
TIME SERIES;
OPTIMIZATION;
ACCURACY;
ALGORITHM;
ARTICLE;
BAYES THEOREM;
BIOINFORMATICS;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION ANALYSIS;
DATA ANALYSIS;
ENTROPY;
GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING;
GENE MAPPING;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MICROARRAY ANALYSIS;
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;
ARTIFACT;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
DNA MICROARRAY;
EVALUATION;
METHODOLOGY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ALGORITHMS;
ARTIFACTS;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING;
OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SOFTWARE;
|
EID: 39749093807
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14712105
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-12 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (99)
|
References (31)
|