Order lot sizing with multiple capacitated suppliers offering leadtime-dependent capacity reservation and unit price discounts

Production Planning and Control

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 142-149

  Hassini, E ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Inventory lot sizing; Leadtime dependent quantity discount; Pre negotiation; Supplier selection

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; COST REDUCTION; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING; SUPPLY CHAINS;

INVENTORY LOT SIZING; LEADTIME-DEPENDENT QUANTITY DISCOUNTS; PRE-NEGOTIATION; SUPPLIER SELECTION;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 39749092257     PISSN: 09537287     EISSN: 13665871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537280801896177     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aissaoui, N., Haouari, M., and Hassini, E., 2007 Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: a review. Computers & operations research, 34 (12), 3516-3540.
2. Austin, L.M. and Hogan, W.W., 1976. Optimizing the procurement of aviation fuels. Management science, 22, 515-527.
3. Basnet, C. and Leung, J.M.Y., 2005, Inventory lot-sizing with supplier selection. Computers and operations research, 32, 1-14.
4. Bazaraa, M.S., Jarvis, J.J. and Sherali, H.D., 1990. Linear programming and netwrok flows. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
5. Chaudhry, S.S., Frost, F.G., and Zydiak, J.L., 1993. Vendor selection with price breaks. European journal of operational research, 70, 52-66.
6. Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Finin, T., Labrou, Y., et al., 1999. A negotiation-based multi-agent system for supply chain management. ACM autonomous agents workshop on agent-based decision-support for managing the Internet-enabled supply-chain. May 1999 Seattle, WA. New York, NY: ACM Press, 15-20.
7. Dickson, G.W., 1966. An analysis of vendor selection: systems and decisions. Journal of purchasing, 1, 5-17.
8. Gainen, L., 1955. Linear programming in bid evaluation. Proceedings of the Second Symposium of Linear Programming DC/S Comptroller, 1, 19-38.
9. Hall, J.M., Kopalle, P.K. and Pyke, D.F., 2002. Static and dynamic pricing of excess capacity in a make-to-order environment. Working Paper No. 2004-012002, Tuck Business School. Available from: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=485702 [Accessed December 2005].
10. Huang, G.Q., Lau, J.S.K. and Mak, K.L., 2003. The impacts of sharing production information on supply chain dynamics: a review of the literature. International journal of production research, 41(7), 1483-1517.
11. Lee, H.L., Padmandbhan, V. and Whang, S., 1997. The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan management review, Spring, 93-102.
12. Maes, J., McLain, J.O. and Van Wassenhove, L.N., 1991. Multilevel Capacitated Lotsizing Complexity and LP-based Heuristics. European journal of operational research, 53, 131-148.
13. National Bureau of Standards, 1954. SEAC determines low bidders. Technical news bulletin, 38-179.
14. Plambeck, L.P. and Taylor, T.A., 2002. Renegotiation of supply contracts. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, Available from: http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/divisions/dro/working_papers/2002/DRO-2002- 08.pdf [Accessed December 2005]
15. Stadtler H., 2005. Supply chain management and advanced planningbasics, overview and challenges, European Journal of Operational Research, 163, 575-588.
16. Stanley, E.D., Honig, D.P. and Gainen, L., 1954. Linear programming in bid evaluation. Naval research logistics quarterly, 1, 48-54.
17. Tempelmeier, H., 2002. A simple heuristic for dynamic order sizing and supplier selection with time-varying data. Production and Operations Management, 11, 499-515.
18. Wagner, H.M. and Whitin, T.M., 1958. Dynamic version of the economic lot-size model. Management Science, 5, 89-96.
19. Waggener, H.A. and Suzuki, G., 1967. Bid evaluation for procurement of aviation fuel at DFSC: a case history. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 14, 115-130.