Tolerance to herbivory in lupin genotypes with different alkaloid concentration: Interspecific differences between Lupinus albus L. and L. angustifolius L.

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 63, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 130-136

  Vilariño, María del Pilar ^a   Ravetta, Damián Andrés ^a  

^a Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Impact   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Grain yield; Lupin; Quinolizidine alkaloids; Re growth

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CROP YIELD; DAMAGE; GENOTYPE; GROWTH; HERBIVORY; LEGUME; METABOLISM; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION;

LUPINUS ALBUS; LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS;

EID: 39749087548     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.032     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anon., 2005. FAO Statistical Databases, in www.fao.org.
2. Belsky A.J., Carson W.P., Jensen C.L., and Fox G.A. Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring?. Evol. Ecol. 7 (1993) 109-121
3. Briggs M., and Schultz J. Chemical defence production in Lotus corniculatus L. II. Trade-offs among growth, reproduction and defense. Oecologia 83 (1990) 32-37
4. Chapin III F.S., Bloom A.J., Field C.B., and Waring R.H. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience 37 (1987) 49-57
5. Duthion C., and Ney B. Chronology of reproductive development of four types of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Period of seed number formation on the different reproductive structures. Proceedings of the Sixth International Lupin Conference. Chile (1990) 255-261
6. Huyghe C. White lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Field Crops Res. 53 (1997) 147-160
7. Kogan M., and Fischer D.C. Inducible defenses in soybean against herbivorous insects. In: Tallamy D.W., and Raupp M.J. (Eds). Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores (1991), John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 347-378
8. López Bellido L., and Fuentes M. Lupin crop as an alternative source of protein. Adv. Agron. 40 (1986) 239-295
9. López Bellido L., Fuentes M., Lhamby J.C.B., and Castillo J.E. Growth and yield of white lupin (Lupinus albus) under Mediterranean conditions: effects of sowing date. Field Crops Res. 36 (1994) 87-94
10. Marriott C.A., and Smith M.A. Seasonal growth of tree lupins (Lupinus arboreus) and the effect of defoliation on leaf production. Ann. Appl. Biol. 124 (1994) 371-382
11. Mauricio R., Rausher M., and Burdick D.S. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive?. Ecology 78 (1997) 1301-1311
12. Mitchell-Olds T., Siemens D., and Pedersen D. Physiology and costs of resistance to herbivore and disease in Brassica. Entom. Exp. Appl. 80 (1996) 231-237
13. Munier-Jolain N.M., Ney B., and Duthion C. Analysis of sequential reproductive development in white lupin cv. Lublanc. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 48 (1997) 913-922
14. Oesterheld M., and Mc Naughton S.J. Effect of stress and time for recovery on the amount of compensatory growth after grazing. Oecologia 85 (1991) 305-313
15. Pimentel D., Mc Laughlin L., Zepp A., Lakitan B., Kraus T., Kleinman P., Vancini F., Roach W.J., Graap E., Keeton W.S., and Selig G. Environmental and economic effects of reducing pesticide use in agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 46 (1993) 273-288
16. Rosenthal J.P., and Kotanen P.M. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 (1994) 145-148
17. Sadras V.O. Cotton compensatory growth after loss of reproductive organs as affected by availability of resources and duration of recovery period. Oecologia 106 (1996) 432-439
18. Sadras V.O. Plagas y cultivos. Una perspectiva fitocéntrica. In: Andrade F.H., and Sadras V.O. (Eds). Bases para el Manejo del Maíz, el Girasol y la Soja (2000), INTA, Balcarce, Argentina 353-369
19. Sadras V.O., and Fitt G. Resistance to insect herbivory of cotton lines: quantification of recovery capacity after damage. Field Crops Res. 52 (1997) 127-134
20. Sadras V.O., and Fitt G. Apical dominance-variability among cotton genotypes and its association with resistance to insect herbivory. Environ. Exp. Bot. 38 (1997) 145-153
21. Simms E.L., and Fritz R.S. The ecology and evolution of host-plant resistance to insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 (1990) 356-360
22. Simms E.L., and Rausher M.D. Costs and benefits of plant tolerance to herbivory. Am. Nat. 130 (1987) 570-581
23. Simons A.M., and Johnston M.O. The cost of compensation. Am. Nat. 153 (1999) 683-687
24. a Latinoamericana de Agrometeorología, Buenos Aires. Argentina (1997) 25-26
25. Strauss S.Y., and Agrawal A.A. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivore. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 (1999) 179-185
26. Trumble J.T., Kolodny-Hirsch D.M., and Ting I.P. Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory. Ann. Rev. Entom. 38 (1993) 93-119
27. van der Meijden E., Wijn M., and Verkaar H. Defense and re-growth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51 (1988) 355-363
28. Vilariño M., Del P., Mareggiani G., Leicach S., Yaber Grass M., and Ravetta D. Post- damage alkaloid concentration in sweet and bitter lupin varieties and its effect on subsequent herbivory. J. Appl. Entom. 129 (2005) 233-279
29. Wink M. Wounding-induced increase of quinolizidine alkaloids accumulation in lupin leaves. Z. Naturforsch. 38c (1983) 905-909
30. Wink M. The role of quinolizidine alkaloids in plant-insect interactions. In: Bernays E.A. (Ed). Focus on Insect-Plant Interactions (1992), CRC Press, Boca Ratón, USA 131-166
31. Zangerl A.R., and Bazzaz F.A. Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz R.S., and Simms E.L. (Eds). Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution and Genetics (1992), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA 363-391