Erratum: The role of the humanities and social sciences in nanotechnology research and development (Nanoethics (2008) vol. 2 (1) 10.1007/s11569-008-0033-z);The role of the humanities and social sciences in nanotechnology research and development

NanoEthics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-13

  Ebbesen, Mette ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Critical function; Ethics; Humanities; Nanotechnology research and development; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749086864     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-008-0045-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (26)

1. Roco MC (2003) Broader societal implications of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 5:181-189
2. National Science and Technology Council, USA (1999) Nanotechnology research directions: IWGN workshop report. In: Roco MC, Williams S and Alivisatos P (eds) Vision for nanotechnology research and development in the next decade
3. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (2004) Technology foresight on danish nanoscience and nanotechnology
4. European Commission (2004) Towards a European strategy for nanotechnology
5. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (2004) How big can small actual be? Study Group on the Consequences of Nanotechnology
6. National Science Foundation (NSF) (2001) Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Report of a workshop run by NSF, 28-29 September 2000. Roco MC (eds) Bainbridge WS
7. European Commission (2004) Science and society action plan
8. European Commission (2003) Europeans and biotechnology in 2002. Eurobarometer 58.0
9. Williams-Jones B (2004) A spoonful of trust helps the nanotech go down. Health Law Rev 12(3):10-13
10. Marris C (2001) Public views on GMOs: Deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public. EMBO Rep 2(7):545-548
11. Sjoeberg L (2004) Principles of risk perception applied to gene technology. EMBO Rep 5:S47-s51
12. Gaskell G, Allum N, Bauer M, Jackson J, Howard S, Lindsey N (2003) Climate change for biotechnology? UK Public Opinion 1991-2002. Agbioforum 6(1&2):55-67
13. Lassen J, Jamison A (2006) Genetic technologies meet the public. Sci Technol Human Values 31(1):8-28
14. Tveit GK, Madsen H, Sandoe P (eds) (2003) Biotechnology and the public. Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment
15. NSF/DOC (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance, nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. NSF/DOC-sponsored report. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds), pp ix-x
16. Ebbesen M, Andersen S, Besenbacher F (2006) Ethics in nanotechnology: starting from scratch? Bull Sci Technol Soc 26(6):451-462
17. Rickerby DG (2004) Risks and ethical challenges of nanotechnology in healthcare. An: Nanotechnologies: a preliminary risk analysis on the basis of a workshop 1-2 March 2004 European Commission, pp 127-131
18. Robison W (2004) Nano-ethics. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the Nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 285-301
19. Gorman ME (2004) Societal dimensions of nanotechnology as a trading zone: Results from a pilot project. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 63-77
20. Satava RM (2002) Disruptive visions: Moral and ethical challenges from advanced technology and issues for the new generation of surgeons. J Surg Endosc 16:1403-1408
21. Drexler E (1986) Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology. Anchor, USA
22. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
23. American 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (2003) http://www.theorator.com/bills108/s189.html
24. Fisher E Mahajan RL (2006) Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development. Sci Public Policy 33(1):5-16
25. Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24:93-109
26. Nielsen AP, Lassen J, Sandøe P (2007) Democracy at its best? The consensus conference in a cross-national perspective. J Agric Environ Ethics 20:13-35