Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 357.e1-357.e10

  Whiting, Penny ^a   Westwood, Marie ^b   Burke, Margaret ^a   Sterne, Jonathan ^a   Glanville, Julie ^b  

^a MRC Health Services Research Collaboration   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliographic databases; Information retrieval; Literature searching; Systematic review; Test accuracy studies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOSIS; DATA BASE; EMBASE; GOLD STANDARD; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCISEARCH; SEARCH ENGINE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 39649109896     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness (2001), University of York, York Report no. 4
2. Glanville J.M., Lefebvre C., Miles J.N., and Camosso-Stefinovic J. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. J Med Libr Assoc 94 (2006) 130-136
3. Lefebvre C., and Clarke M.J. Identifying randomised trials. In: Egger M., Davey S.G., and Altman D.G. (Eds). Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context (2001), BMJ Books, London 69-86
4. Haynes R.B., and Wilczynski N.L. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ 328 (2004) 1040-1044
5. Leeflang M.M., Scholten R.J., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., and Bossuyt P.M. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006) 234-240
6. Dickersin K., Scherer R., and Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 309 (1994) 1286-1291
7. Fielding A.M., and Powell A. Using Medline to achieve an evidence-based approach to diagnostic clinical biochemistry. Ann Clin Biochem 39 Pt 4 (2002) 345-350
8. Bachmann L.M., Coray R., Estermann P., and ter R.G. Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: reducing the number needed to read. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9 (2002) 653-658
9. Bachmann L.M., Estermann P., Kronenberg C., and ter R.G. Identifying diagnostic accuracy studies in EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc 91 (2003) 341-346
10. Deville W.L., Bezemer P.D., and Bouter L.M. Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol 53 (2000) 65-69
11. Deville W.L., Buntinx F., Bouter L.M., Montori V.M., de Vet H.C., van der Windt D.A., et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2 (2002) 9-21
12. Haynes R.B., Wilczynski N., McKibbon K.A., Walker C.J., and Sinclair J.C. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1 (1994) 447-458
13. van der Weijden T., IJzermans C.J., Dinant G.J., van Duijn N.P., de V.R., and Buntinx F. Identifying relevant diagnostic studies in MEDLINE. The diagnostic value of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and dipstick as an example. Fam Pract 14 (1997) 204-208
14. Vincent S., Greenley S., and Beaven O. Clinical evidence diagnosis: developing a sensitive search strategy to retrieve diagnostic studies on deep vein thrombosis: a pragmatic approach. Health Info Libr J 20 (2003) 150-159
15. Wilczynski N.L., and Haynes R.B. EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers. BMC Med 3 (2005) 7-12
16. Doust J.A., Pietrzak E., Sanders S., and Glasziou P.P. Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract. J Clin Epidemiol 58 (2005) 444-449
17. Mitchell R., Rinaldi F., and Craig J. Performance of published search strategies for studies of diagnostic test accuracy (SDTAs) in Medline and Embase (2005), The Cochorane Collabaration, Oxford. http://cochrane.org/colloquia/abstracts/melbourne/O-01.htm Available at:
18. Ritchie G, Glanville J, Lefebure C. Do published search filters to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies perform adequately? Health Information and Libraries Journal. In press.
19. Burch J, Soares-Weiser K, Duffy S, Smith S, Kleijnen J, Westwood M. Diagnostic accuracy of faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) used in screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Med Screen. In press.
20. Collins R., Burch J., Cranny G., Aguiar-Ilbanez R., Craig D., Wright K., et al. Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review. BMJ 334 (2007) 1257-1265
21. Honest H., Bachmann L.M., Gupta J.K., Kleijnen J., and Khan K.S. Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review. BMJ 325 (2002) 301-310
22. Honest H., Bachmann L.M., Knox E.M., Gupta J.K., Kleijnen J., and Khan K.S. The accuracy of various tests for bacterial vaginosis in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. BJOG 111 (2004) 409-422
23. Rodgers M., Hempel S., Aho T., Kelly J., Kleijnen J., and Westwood M. Diagnostic tests used in the investigation of adult haematuria: systematic review. BJU Int 98 (2006) 1154-1160
24. Westwood M.E., Whiting P.F., Cooper J., Watt I.S., and Kleijnen J. Further investigation of confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 5 (2005) 2-12
25. Whiting P., Westwood M., Watt I., Cooper J., and Kleijnen J. Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 5 (2005) 4-16
26. Whiting P., Harbord R., Main C., Deeks J.J., Filippini G., Egger M., et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic review. BMJ 332 (2006) 875-884
27. Sampson M., Zhang L., Morrison A., Barrowman N.J., Clifford T.J., Platt R.W., et al. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. BMC Med Res Methodol 6 (2006) 33-41
28. Boynton J., Glanville J., McDaid D., Lefebvre C., and Sheldon T. Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE: developing an objective approach to search strategy design. J Info Sci 24 (1998) 137-157
29. White V., Glanville J., Lefebvre C., and Sheldon T. A statistical approach to designing search filters to find systematic reviews: objectivity enhances accuracy. J Info Sci 27 (2001) 357-370
30. Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., Gatsonis C.A., Glasziou P.P., Irwig L.M., et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 138 (2003) 40-44