Changes in activity after a complete spinal cord injury as measured by the spinal cord independence measure II (SCIM II) (Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair (2008) 22,3 (279-287) DOI: 10.1177/1545968307306240);Changes in activity after a complete spinal cord injury as measured by the spinal cord independence measure II (SCIM II)

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 145-153

  Wirth, Brigitte ^a,b   Van Hedel, Hubertus J A ^a,c   Kometer, Barbara ^a   Dietz, Volker ^a,c   Curt, Armin ^c  

^a BALGRIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment; Recovery; Spinal Cord Independence Measure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FRIEDMAN TEST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAPLEGIA; QUADRIPLEGIA; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

EID: 39649105848     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308327266     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Anonymous. Clinical assessment after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2002 ; 50: S21 - S29.
2. American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia. International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, Revised 1996. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association ; 1996.
3. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987 ; 1: 6-18.
4. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 ; 74: 531-536.
5. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y., Granger CV, Fiedler RC The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 ; 77: 1226-1232.
6. Meiners T., Böhm V., Schlüter E. Analysis of FIM data collected during hospital treatment of patients with acute spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation. 2004 ; 43: 129-136.
7. Middleton JW, Harvey LA, Batty J., Cameron I., Quirk R., Winstanley J. Five additional mobility and locomotor items to improve responsiveness of the FIM in wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006 ; 44: 495-504.
8. Yavuz N., Tezyürek M., Akyüz M. A comparison of two functional tests in quadriplegia: the quadriplegia index of function and the functional independence measure. Spinal Cord. 1998 ; 36: 832-837.
9. Middleton J., Truman G., Geraghty T. Neurological level effect on the discharge functional status of spinal cord injured persons after rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 ; 79: 1428-1432.
10. Marino RJ, Huang M., Knight P., Herbison GJ, Ditunno JF, Segal M. Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: comparison of the quadriplegia index of function (QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM). Paraplegia. 1993 ; 31: 225-233.
11. Catz A., Itzkovich M., Agranov E., Ring H., Tamir A. SCIM-spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997 ; 35: 850-856.
12. Catz A., Itzkovich M., Steinberg F., et al. The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. Disabil Rehabil. 2001 ; 23: 263-268.
13. Marino RJ, Rider-Forster D., Maissel G., Ditunno JH Superiority of motor level over single neurological level in categorizing tetraplegia. Paraplegia. 1995 ; 33: 510-513.
14. Ota T., Akaboshi K., Nagata M., et al. Functional assessment of patients with spinal cord injury: measured by the motor score and the Functional Independence Measure. Spinal Cord. 1996 ; 34: 531-535.
15. Waters RL, Yakura JS, Adkins RH, Sie I. Recovery following complete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 ; 73: 784-789.
16. Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 ; 74: 242-247.
17. Dawson-Saunders B., Trapp R. Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. 2 nd ed. Toronto, ON, Canada: Prentice Hall International ; 1994.
18. Chan SCC, Chan APS. Rehabilitation outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury in a tertiary spinal cord injury centre: a comparison with an international standard. Spinal Cord. 2005 ; 43: 489-498.
19. Hall KM, Cohen M., Wright J., Call M., Werner P. Characteristics of the functional independence measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 ; 80: 1471-1476.
20. Cardenas D., Hoffmann J., Kirshblum S., McKinley W. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 1757-1763.
21. Bracken M., Holford TH Neurological and functional status 1 year after acute spinal cord injury: estimates of functional recovery in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study II from results modeled in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study III. J Neurosurg. 2002 ; 96: 259-266.
22. Müslümanoglu L., Aki S., Oeztürk Y., et al. Motor, sensory and functional recovery in patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997 ; 35: 386-389.
23. Salisbury S., Low Choy N., Nitz J. Shoulder pain, range of motion and functional motor skills after acute tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 ; 84: 1480-1485.
24. Salisbury S., Nitz J., Souvlis T. Shoulder pain following tetraplegia: a follow-up study 2-4 years after injury. Spinal Cord. 2006 ; 44: 723-728.
25. Catz A., Itzkovich M., Tesio L., et al. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III. Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007 ; 45: 275-291.