A flexible integration strategy for in-car telematics systems

SEAS 2005 - Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering for Automotive Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Bauer, Thomas ^c   Herrmann, Jens ^a   Liggesmeyer, Peter ^b   Robinson Mallett, Christopher ^c  

^a DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automotive; Components; Integration testing; Message sequence charts; Telematics; Test planning

Indexed keywords

FLOWCHARTING; INTEGRATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPECIFICATIONS; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

AUTOMOTIVE; COMPONENTS; MESSAGE SEQUENCE CHARTS; TELEMATICS; TEST PLANNING;

INTEGRATION TESTING;

EID: 39649102813     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1083190.1083194     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. MOST-Cooperation, Media Oriented System Transport, www.mostnet.org.
2. ITU, ITU Z.120 Message Sequence Charts (MSC-2000), www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/languages/.
3. Object Management Group, OMG UML 2.0, www.omg.org/technology/documents/modeling-spec-catalog.htm.
4. O. Haugen, Comparing UML2.0 Interactions and MSC-2000, SAM 2004, 4th International SDL and MSC Workshop, Ottawa, Canada, 2004.
5. P. Baker, P. Bristow, C. Jervis, D. J. King, B. Mitchel, Automatic Generation of Conformance Tests from Message Sequence Charts, SAM 2002 3rd International SDL and MSC Workshop, Aberystwyth, 2002.
6. M. Ebner, TTCN-3 Test Case Generation from Message Sequence Charts, ISSRE'04, Workshop on Integrated Reliability with Telecommunications and UML, Rennes, 2004.
7. ITU-T Recommendation X.292, OSI conformance testing methodology and framework for protocol Recommendations for ITU-T applications - The Tree and Tabular Combined Notation (TTCN), 1998.
8. ITU-T Recommendation Z.140, The Tree and Tabular Combined Notation version 3 (TTCN-3): Core Language, 2001.
9. L. Briand, Y. Labiche, Y. Wand, An Investigation of Graph-Based Class Integration Test Order Strategies, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29 (6), 2003.
10. L. Briand, J. Feng, Y. Labiche, Experimenting with Genetic Algorithms and Coupling Measures to Devise Optimal Integration Test Orders, Software Engineering with Computational Intelligence, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
11. Y. Wu, M. Chen, J. Offutt, UML-based Integration Testing for Component-Based Software, 2nd International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS), Ottawa, 2003.
12. W. K. Chan, T. Y. Chen, T. H. Tse, An Overview of Integration Testing Techniques for Object-Oriented Programs, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS 2002), Mt. Pleasant, 2002.
13. F. Basanieri, A. Bertolino, E. Marchetti, A. Ribolino, G. Lombardi, G. Nucera, An Automated Test Strategy Based on UML Diagrams, Proc. Ericsson Rational User Conference, Upplands Vasby, Sweden, October 2001.
14. F. Basanieri, A. Bertolino, A practical approach to UML-based derivation of integration tests, Proc. Software Quality Week Europe QWE2000, 2000.
15. R. Heckel, L. Mariani, Component Integration Testing by Graph Transformations, International Conference on Computer Science, Software Engineering, Information Technology, e-Business, and Applications, Cairo, 2004.