Problematic methods in the assessment of scholarly productivity in clinical PhD programs

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 102-104

  Andersen, Barbara L ^a   Beck, Steven J ^a   Bornstein, Robert A ^a   Emery, Charles F ^a   Fristad, Mary A ^a   Kiecolt Glaser, Janice K ^a   Strunk, Daniel R ^a   Thayer, Julian F ^a   Vasey, Michael W ^a   Yeates, Keith O ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic reputations; Program evaluation; Rankings; Scholarly productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 39649101681     PISSN: 09695893     EISSN: 14682850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00115.x     Document Type: Review

References (2)

1. Heesacker, M., & Elliott, T. R. (2007). My dog's better than your dog: Publication counts and quality of clinical psychology PhD training. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14, 175-178.
2. Stewart, P. K., Roberts, M. C., & Roy, K. M. (2007). Scholarly productivity in clinical psychology PhD programs: A normative assessment of publication rates. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14, 157-171.