Toward an integrated system of clade names

Systematic Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 956-974

  De Queiroz, Kevin ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apomorphy; Branch; Clade; Crown clade; Names; Node; Stem; Total clade

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; SNAKE;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SNAKES;

EID: 39549112161     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701656378     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Anderson, J. S. 2002. Use of well-known names in phylogenetic nomenclature: A reply to Laurin. Syst. Biol. 51:822-827. (Pubitemid 35294812)
2. Avise, J. C., and G. C. Johns. 1999. Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:7358-7363. (Pubitemid 29299666)
3. Ax, P. 1985. Stem species and the stem lineage concept. Cladistics 1:279- 287.
4. Ax, P. 1987. The phylogenetic system: The systematization of organisms on the basis of their phylogenesis. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
5. Ax, P. 1996-2003. Multicellular animals, Volumes 1-3. Springer, Berlin.
6. Bryant, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades. Syst. Biol. 43:124-130.
7. Cantino, P. D., and K. de Queiroz. 2006. International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature. Version 3a. http://www.ohiou.edu/ phylocode/.
8. Cantino, P. D., J. A. Doyle, S. W. Graham, W. S. Judd, R. G. Olmstead, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and M. J. Donoghue. 2007. Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon 56:822-846. (Pubitemid 47508226)
9. Carroll, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate paleontology and evolution.W. H. Freeman, New York.
10. Clarke, J. A. 2004. Morphology, phylogenetic taxonomy, and systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 286:1-179. (Pubitemid 40518640)
11. Cloutier, R., and P. E. Ahlberg. 1996. Morphology, characters, and the interrelationships or basal sarcopterygians. Pages 445-479 in Interrelationships of fishes (M. L. J. Stiassny, L. R. Parenti, and G. D. Johnson, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California.
12. Coates, M. I., and J. A. Clack. 1990. Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapod limbs. Nature 347:66-69. (Pubitemid 120015020)
13. Colless, D. H. 1977. A cornucopia of categories. Syst. Zool. 26:349-352.
14. Craske, A. J., and R. P. S. Jefferies. 1989. A new mitrate from the Upper Ordovician of Norway, and a new approach to subdividing a plesion. Palaeontology 32:69-99. (Pubitemid 20414536)
15. de Queiroz, K. 1994. Replacement of an essentialistic perspective on taxonomic definitions as exemplified by the definition of "Mammalia." Syst. Biol. 43:497-510. (Pubitemid 24987231)
16. de Queiroz, K. 1995. The definitions of species and clade names:Areply to Ghiselin. Biol. Philos. 10:223-228.
17. de Queiroz, K. 1997. The linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15:125-144.
18. de Queiroz, K. 2006. The PhyloCode and the distinction between taxonomy and nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 55:160-162.
19. de Queiroz, K., and P. D. Cantino. 2001. Phylogenetic nomenclature and the Phylocode. Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 58:254-271.
20. de Queiroz, K., and M. J. Donoghue. 1990. Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson's version of cladistics. Cladistics 6:61-75.
21. de Queiroz, K., and J. Gauthier. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39:307-322.
22. de Queiroz, K., and J. Gauthier. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:449-480.
23. de Queiroz, K., and J. Gauthier. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:27-31. (Pubitemid 124001386)
24. Donoghue, P. C. J. 2005. Saving the stem group - A contradiction in terms? Paleobiology 31:553-558. (Pubitemid 41520242)
25. Farris, J. S. 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst. Zool. 23:548-554.
26. Freeman, S. 2005. Biological science. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
27. Frost, D. R., and A. G. Kluge. 1994. A consideration of epistemology in systematic biology, with special reference to species. Cladistics 10:259-294.
28. Futuyma, D. J. 2005. Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
29. Gaffney, E. S. 1980. Tetrapod monophyly:Aphylogenetic analysis. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 13:92-105.
30. Gauthier, J. A. 1984. A cladistic analysis of the higher systematic categories of the Diapsida. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
31. Gauthier, J. 1986. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. Pages 1-55 in The origin of birds and the evolution of flight (K. Padian, ed.). California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.
32. Gauthier, J., and K. de Queiroz. 2001. Feathered dinosaurs, flying dinosaurs, crown dinosaurs, and the name "Aves." Pages 7-41 in New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds (J. Gauthier and L. F. Gall, eds.). Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
33. Gauthier, J., R. Estes, and K. de Queiroz. 1988a. A phylogenetic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha. Pages 15-98 in Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families (R. Estes, and G. K. Pregill, eds.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
34. Gauthier, J. A., A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe. 1988b. The early evolution of the Amniota. Pages 103-155 in The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Volume 1: Amphibians, reptiles, birds (M. J. Benton, ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
35. Goodrich, E. S. 1916. On the classification of the Reptilia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 89:261-276.
36. Goodrich, E. S. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. Macmillan, London.
37. Hall, B. G. 2004. Phylogenetic trees made easy, 2nd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
38. Hennig,W. 1965. Phylogenetic systematics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 10:97- 116.
39. Hennig,W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
40. Hennig,W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Kramer, Frankfurt.
41. Hennig, W. 1981. Insect phylogeny. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
42. Hennig, W. 1983. Stammesgeschichte der Chordaten. Fortschr. zool. Syst. Evol. 2:1-208.
43. Heywood, V. H. 1988. The structure of systematics. Pages 44-56 in Prospects in systematics (D. L. Hawksworth, ed.). Clarendon, Oxford, UK.
44. Jefferies, R. P. S. 1979. The origin of chordates - A methodological essay. Pages 443-477 in The origin of major invertebrate groups (M. R. House, ed.). Academic Press, London.
45. Jeffrey, C. 1989. Biological nomenclature. Edward Arnold, London.
46. Joyce,W. G., J. E. Parham, and J. A. Gauthier. 2004. Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based taxon names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles. J. Paleontol. 78:989- 1013. (Pubitemid 39138822)
47. Laurin, M. 2002. Tetrapod phylogeny, amphibian origins, and the definition of the name Tetrapoda. Syst. Biol. 51:364-369. (Pubitemid 35180713)
48. Laurin, M., and R. R. Reisz. 1997. A new perspective on tetrapod phylogeny. Pages 9-59 in Amniote origins: Completing the transition to land (S. S. Sumida and K. L. M. Martin, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California.
49. Lauterbach, K.-E. 1989. Das Pan-Monophylum-Ein Hilfsmittel für die Praxis der phylogenetischen Systematik. Zool. Anz. 223:139-156.
50. Lee, M. S. Y. 1999. Stability of higher taxa in phylogenetic nomenclature - Some comments on Moore (1998). Zool. Scr. 28:361- 366.
51. Lee, M. S. Y. 2001. Snake origins and the need for scientific agreement on vernacular names. Paleobiology 27:1-6.
52. Lucas, S. G. 1992. Extinction and the definition of the class Mammalia. Syst. Biol. 41:370-371.
53. Mayr, E., and P. D. Ashlock. 1991. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
54. Meier, R., and S. Richter. 1992. Suggestions for a more precise usage of proper names of taxa: Ambiguities related to the stem lineage concept. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol. 30:81-88.
55. Monks, N. 2002. Cladistic analysis of a problematic ammonite groups: The Hamitidae (Cretaceous, Albian-Turonian) and proposals for new cladistic terms. Palaeontology 45:689-707. (Pubitemid 34817177)
56. Nordal, I., and B. Stedje. 2005. Paraphyletic taxa should be accepted. Taxon 564:5-6.
57. Padian, K., J. R. Hutchinson, and J. Thomas R. Holtz. 1999. Phylogenetic definitions and nomenclature of the major taxonomic categories of the carnivorous Dinosauria (Theropoda). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 19:69- 80.
58. Page, R. D., and E. C. Holmes. 1998. Molecular evolution: A phylogenetic approach. Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts.
59. Patterson, C. 1994. Bony fishes. Pages 57-84 in Major features in vertebrate evolution (D. R. Prothero and R. M. Schoch, eds.). Short Courses in Paleontology 7. The Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tennessee.
60. Patterson, C., and D. E. Rosen. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 158:81-172.
61. Pisani, D., A. M. Yates, M. C. Langer, and M. J. Benton. 2002. A genuslevel supertree of the Dinosauria. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269:915-921.
62. Purves,W. K., D. Sadava, G. H. Orians, and H. C. Heller. 2001. Life: The science of biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
63. Rowe, T. 1988. Definition, diagnosis, and origin of Mammalia. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 8:241-264.
64. Rowe, T., and J. Gauthier. 1992. Ancestry, paleontology, and definition of the name Mammalia. Syst. Biol. 41:372-378.
65. Ruta, M., M. I. Coates, and D. L. J. Quicke. 2003. Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biol. Rev. 78:251-345. (Pubitemid 36687356)
66. Schander, C., and M. Thollesson. 1995. Phylogenetic taxonomy - Some comments. Zool. Scr. 24:263-268.
67. Sereno, P. C. 1991. Basal archosaurs: Phylogenetic relationships and functional implications. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. (supplement) 11:1-53.
68. Sereno, P. C. 1999. Definitions in phylogenetic taxonomy: Critique and rationale. Syst. Biol. 48:329-351. (Pubitemid 129493670)
69. Shubin, N. H., E. B. Daeschler, and F. A. Jenkins, Jr. 2006. The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature 440:764- 771.
70. Simpson, G. G. 1960. Diagnosis of the classes Reptilia and Mammalia. Evolution 14:388-392.
71. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
72. Walossek, D., and K. J. Müller. 1990. Upper Cambrian stem-lineage crustaceans and their bearing upon the monophyletic origin of Crustacea and the position of Agnostus. Lethaia 23:409-427.
73. Wiley, E. O. 1979. An annotated Linnaean hierarchy, with comments on natural taxa and competing systems. Syst. Zool. 28:308-337.
74. Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. Wiley, New York.