Monitoring of the sediment dynamics along a sandy shoreline by means of airborne hyperspectral remote sensing and LIDAR: A case study in Belgium

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 280-294

  Deronde, Bart ^a   Houthuys, R ^a   Henriet, J P ^b   Van Lancker, V ^b  

^a FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Airborne hyperspectral remote sensing; Beach morphodynamics; Belgium; LIDAR; Sandy shoreline; Sediment transport

Indexed keywords

BEACHES; DATA ACQUISITION; MONITORING; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; STATISTICS;

AIRBORNE HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING; MORPHODYNAMICS;

SEDIMENT TRANSPORT;

BEACHES; DATA ACQUISITION; MONITORING; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; STATISTICS;

AIRBORNE SENSING; BEACH MORPHOLOGY; BEACH NOURISHMENT; DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; LIDAR; MONITORING; MORPHODYNAMICS; REMOTE SENSING; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SHORELINE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

BELGIUM; BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; WEST FLANDERS; WESTERN EUROPE; ZEEBRUGGE;

EID: 39549106259     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1545     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baeteman C, Declercq PY. 2002. A synthesis of early and middle holocene coastal changes in the Western Belgian lowlands. Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Geografie 2: 7-107.
2. Beets DJ, van der Spek AJF. 2000. The Holocene evolution of the barrier and the back-barrier basins of Belgium and the Netherlands as a function of late Weichselian morphology, relative sea-level rise and sediment supply. Geologie en Mijnbouw 79(1): 3-16.
3. Berk A, Bernstein LS, Robertson DC. 1989. MODTRAN: A Moderate Resolution Model for LOWTRAN7, Report GL-TR-890122. Air Force Geophysics Lab: Bedford, MA.
4. Bird ECF. 2000. Coastal Geomorphology, an Introduction. Wiley: Chichester.
5. Brock JC, Wright CW, Sallenger AH, Krabill WB, Swift RN. 2002. Basis and methods of NASA airborne topographic mapper LIDAR surveys for coastal studies. Journal of Coastal Research 18(1): 1-13.
6. Cracknell AP. 1999. Remote sensing techniques in estuaries and coastal zones - an update. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19(3): 485-496.
7. Dean RG. 2002. Beach Nourishment: Theory and Practice. World Scientific: River Edge, NJ.
8. De Moor G. 2006. Het Vlaamse Strand, Geomorfologie en Dynamiek. VLIZ: Oostende.
9. Deronde B, Houthuys R, Debruyn W, Fransaer D, Van Lancker V, Henriet JP. 2006a. Using airborne hyperspectral data and laserscan data to study beach morphodynamics along the Belgian coast. Journal of Coastal Research 22(5): 1108-1118.
10. Deronde B, Kempeneers P, Forster RM, Debruyn W. 2006b. Imaging spectroscopy as a tool to study sediment characteristics on a tidal sand bank in the Westerschelde. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 69(3/4): 580-590.
11. De Wolf P, Houthuys R. 1997. Evaluation of a beach nourishment combined with a nearshore feeder berm realized at the Belgian coast. Proceedings of the Coastal Zone 97 Conference, Boston, MA, 1997.
12. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. 2001. Pattern Classification. Wiley: New York.
13. Fisher R. 1936. The use of multiple measures in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7: 179-188.
14. Goetz AFH. 1992. Principles of narrow band spectrometry in the visible and IR: instruments and data analysis. In Imaging Spectroscopy: Fundamental and Prospective Applications, Toselli F, Bodechtel J (eds), Kluwer: Dordrecht; 21-32.
15. Houthuys R, De Moor G, Somme J. 1993. The shaping of the French-Belgian North Sea Coast throughout recent geology and history. In Coastlines of the Southern North Sea, Hillen R, Verhagen J (eds). American Society of Civil Engineers: New York; 27-40.
16. IPCC. 2001, Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. IPCC: Geneva.
17. Kalayeh HM, Muasher MJ, Landgrebe DA. 1983. Feature selection with limited training samples. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 21(4): 434-438.
18. Kempeneers P, De Backer S, Debruyn W, Coppin P, Scheunders P. 2005a. Generic wavelet-based hyperspectral classification applied to vegetation stress detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43: 610-614.
19. Kempeneers P, De Backer S, Provoost S, Debruyn W, Scheunders P. 2005b. Hyperspectral classification applied to the Belgian coastline. Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Remote Sensing 144-152.
20. Malthus TJ, Mumby PJ. 2003. Remote sensing of the coastal zone: an overview and priorities for future research. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24(13): 2805-2815.
21. McLachlan A, Jaramillo E, Donn TE, Wessels F. 1993. Sand beach macrofauna communities: a geographical comparison. Journal of Coastal Research 15: 27-38.
22. Mills E. 2005. Insurers in a climate of change. Science 308: 1040-1044.
23. Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ. 2002. Mapping marine environments with IKONOS imagery: enhanced spatial resolution can deliver greater thematic accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment 82: 248-257.
24. Pudil P, Novovièová J, Kittler J. 1994. Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters 15(1): 1119-1125.
25. Revell DL, Komar PD, Sallenger AH. 2002. An application of LIDAR to analyses of El Niño erosion in the Netarts littoral cell, Oregon. Journal of Coastal Research 18(4): 792-801.
26. Richter R, Schläpfer D. 2002. Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imaging spectrometry data. Part 2: Atmospheric/topographic correction. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23(13): 2631-2649.
27. Rottier H, Arnoldus H. 1984. De Vlaamse kustvlakte van Calais tot Saeftinge. Lannoo: Tielt.
28. Sallenger AH, Krabill WB, Swift RN, Arens J, List JH, Hansen M, Holman RA, Manizade S, Sontag J, Meredith A, Morgan K, Yunkel JK, Frederick EB, Stockdon H. 2003. Evaluation of airborne topographic LIDAR for quantifying beach changes. Journal of Coastal Research 19(1): 125-133.
29. Short AD. 2001. Handbook of Beach and Shoreface Morphodynamics. Wiley: Brisbane.
30. Speybroeck J, Bonte D, Courtens W, Gheskiere T, Grootaert P, Maelfait JP, Mathys M, Provoost S, Sabbe K, Stienen EWM, Van Lancker V, Vincx M, Degraer S. 2006. Beach nourishment: an ecologically sound coastal defence alternative? A review. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 16(4): 419-435.
31. Stockdon HF, Sallenger AH, List JH, Holman RA. 2002. Estimation of shoreline position and change using airborne topographic LIDAR data. Journal of Coastal Research 18(2): 502-513.
32. Su J, Bork E. 2006. Influence of vegetation, slope, and LIDAR sampling angle on DEM accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 72(11): 1265-1274.
33. van der Wal D. 1998. The impact of the grain-size distribution of nourishment sand on aeolian sand transport. Journal of Coastal Research 14(2): 620-631.
34. van der Wal D. 2000a. Grain-size-selective aeolian sand transport on a nourished beach. Journal of Coastal Research 16(3): 896-908.
35. van der Wal D. 2000b. Modelling aeolian sand transport and morphological development in two beach nourishment areas. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25: 77-92.
36. White SA, Wang Y. 2003. Utilizing DEMs derived from LIDAR data to analyze morphologic change in the North Carolina coastline. Remote Sensing of Environment 85: 39-47.
37. Wright LD, Thom BG. 1977. Coastal depositional landforms, a morphodynamic approach. Progress in Physical Geography 1: 412-459.