Erratum: Performance of integrated FDG-PET/CT for differentiating benign and malignant lung lesions - Results from a large prospective clinical trial (Molecular Imaging ang Biology 10.1007/s11307-007-0129-9);Performance of integrated FDG-PET/CT for differentiating benign and malignant lung lesions -Results from a Large Prospective Clinical Trial

Molecular Imaging and Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 121-128

  Pauls, Sandra ^a   Buck, Andreas K ^a   Halter, Gisela ^a   Mottaghy, Felix M ^a   Muche, Rainer ^a   Bluemel, Christina ^a   Gerstner, Susanne ^a   Krüger, Stefan ^a   Glatting, Gerhard ^a   Sunder Plassmann, Ludger ^a   Möller, Peter ^a   Brambs, Hans Jürgen ^a   Reske, Sven N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lung tumor; MDCT; NSCLC; PET; PET CT

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG CANCER; LUNG TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 39549099095     PISSN: 15361632     EISSN: 18602002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-008-0135-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (29)

1. Brundage MD, Davies D, Mackillop WJ (2002) Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: A decade of progress. Chest 122:1037-1057
2. Naruke T, Goya T, Tsuchiya R, Suemasu K (1988) Prognosis and survival in resected lung carcinoma based on the new international staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 96:440-447
3. Higashino T, Ohno Y, Takenaka D et al (2005) Thin-section multiplanar reformats from multidetector-row CT data: Utility for assessment of regional tumor extent in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Radiol 56:48-55
4. Chooi WK, Matthews S, Bull MJ, Morcos SK (2005) Multislice computed tomography in staging lung cancer: The role of multiplanar image reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:357-360
5. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL, Midthun DE (1996) Lung nodule enhancement at CT: Prospective findings. Radiology 201:447-455
6. Webb WR (2005) Lung cancer and bronchopulmonary neoplasms. In: Webb WR, Higgins CB (eds) Thoracic imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
7. Pastorino U, Bellomi M, Landoni C et al (2003) Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet 362:593-597
8. Gupta N, Gill H, Graeber G, Bishop H, Hurst J, Stephens T (1998) Dynamic positron emission tomography with F18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant lung/mediastinallLesions. Chest 114:1105-1111
9. Hübner KF, Buonocore E, Gould HR et al (1996) Differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions using "quantitative" parameters of FDG PET images. Clin Nucl Med 37:943-948
10. Pieterman RM, van Putten JWG, Meuzelaar JJ et al (2000) Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography. N Engl J Med 343:254-261
11. De Wever W, Ceyssens S, Mortelmans L et al (2007) Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: Comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT. Eur Radiol 17:23-32
12. Pauls S, Buck AK, Hohl K et al (2007) Improved non-invasive T-staging in non-small cell lung cancer by integrated 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Nuklearmedizin 46:9-14
13. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF et al (2003) Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med 348:2500-2507
14. Shim SS, Lee KS, Kim B-T, Choi JY, Chung MJ, Lee EJ (2006) Focal parenchymal lung lesions showing a potential of false-positive and false-negative interpretations on integrated PET/CT. Am J Roentgenol 186:639-648
15. Webb WR (2005) Solitary and multiple nodules, masses, cavities, and cystes. In: Webb WR, Higgins CB (eds) Thoracic imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
16. Von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF (2006) Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology 238:405-422
17. Yi CA, Lee KS, Kim B-T et al (2006) Tissue characterization of solitary pulmonary nodule: Comparative study between helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT. J Nucl Med 47:443-450
18. Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Debatin JF (2004) To enhance or not to enhance? 18 F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18 F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 45:56S-65S
19. Low S-Y, Eng P, Keng GHW, Ng DCE (2006) Positron emission tomography with CT in the evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer in populations with a high prevalence of tuberculosis. Respirology 11:84-89
20. Kim SK, Allen-Auerbach M, Goldin J et al (2007) Accuracy of PET/CT in characterization of solitary pulmonary lesions. J Nucl Med 48:214-220
21. Jeong YJ, Yi CA, Lee KS (2007) Solitary pulmonary nodules: Detection, characterization, and guidance for further diagnostic workup and treatment. Am J Roentgenol 188:57-68
22. Truong MT, Erasmus JJ, Macapinlac HA et al (2005) Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer - normal variants and pitfalls. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:205-209
23. Benard F, Sterman D, Smith RJ, Kaiser LR, Albelda SM, Alavi A (1998) Metabolic imaging of malignant pleural mesothelioma with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Chest 114:713-722
24. Bryant AS, Cerfolio RJ (2006) The maximum standardized uptake values on integrated FDG-PET/CT is useful in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg. 82:1016-10220
25. Krüger S, Buck AK, Blumstein NM et al (2006) Use of integrated FDG PET/CT imaging in pulmonary carcinoid tumours. J Intern Med 260:545-550
26. Hashimoto Y, Tsujikawa T, Kondo C et al (2006) Accuray of PET for diagnosis of solid pulmonary lesions with 18 F-FDG uptake below the standardized uptake value of 2.5. J Nucl Med 47:426-431
27. Lobrano MB, Hayman E, Dekelbaum M, Campeau R (2005) Biopsy findings in PET/CT-positive lung lesions in a community hospital. J La State Med Soc 157:319-324
28. Alkhawaldeh K, Bural G, Kumar R, Alavi A (2007) Impact of dual-time-point (18)F-FDG PET imaging and partial volume correction in the assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (in press; Epub ahead of print; Oct 16 2007)
29. Nie Y, Li Q, Li F, Pu Y, Appelbaum D, Doi K (2006) Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: A semiautomatic computer-aided method. J Nucl Med 47:1075-1080