Successful Continuous Interscalene Analgesia for Ambulatory Shoulder Surgery in a Private Practice Setting

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 122-128

  Fredrickson, Michael J ^a,b   Ball, Craig M ^b   Dalgleish, Adam J ^b  

^a THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b South Auckland Health   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Ambulatory; Catheter; Continuous; Interscalene; Shoulder; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; DICLOFENAC; LIDOCAINE; OPIATE; PARACETAMOL; ROPIVACAINE; TRAMADOL;

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; CATHETER; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPNEA; FEMALE; HOARSENESS; HORNER SYNDROME; HUMAN; INTERSCALENE ANALGESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARESTHESIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PTOSIS; RECOVERY ROOM; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER PAIN; SHOULDER SURGERY; ULTRASOUND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; AMIDES; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; BRACHIAL PLEXUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOULDER;

EID: 39449139946     PISSN: 10987339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Wilson A.T., Nicholson E., Burton L., and Wild C. Analgesia for day-case shoulder surgery. Br J Anaesth 92 (2004) 414-415
2. Borgeat A., Schappi B., Biasca N., and Gerber C. Patient-controlled analgesia after major shoulder surgery: patient-controlled interscalene analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia. Anesthesiology 87 (1997) 1343-1347
3. Borgeat A., Dullenkopf A., Ekatodramis G., and Nagy L. Evaluation of the lateral modified approach for continuous interscalene block after shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology 99 (2003) 436-442
4. Capdevila X., Pirat P., Bringuier S., Gaertner E., Singelyn F., Bernard N., Choquet O., Bouaziz H., and Bonnet F. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in hospital wards after orthopedic surgery: a multicenter prospective analysis of the quality of postoperative analgesia and complications in 1,416 patients. Anesthesiology 103 (2005) 1035-1045
5. Casati A., Danelli G., Baciarello M., Corradi M., Leone S., Di Cianni S., and Fanelli G. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology 106 (2007) 992-996
6. Perlas A., Niazi A., McCartney C., Chan V., Xu D., and Abbas S. The sensitivity of motor response to nerve stimulation and paresthesia for nerve localization as evaluated by ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31 (2006) 445-450
7. Ilfeld B.M., Morey T.E., Wright T.W., Chidgey L.K., and Enneking F.K. Interscalene perineural ropivacaine infusion: a comparison of two dosing regimens for postoperative analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29 (2004) 9-16
8. Borgeat A., and Capdevila X. Neurostimulation/ultrasonography: the Trojan war will not take place. Anesthesiology 106 (2007) 896-898
9. Ilfeld B.M., Morey T.E., Wright T.W., Chidgey L.K., and Enneking F.K. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 96 (2003) 1089-1095 table of contents.
10. Ilfeld B.M., Esener D.E., Morey T.E., and Enneking F.K. Ambulatory perineural infusion: the patients' perspective. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28 (2003) 418-423
11. Swenson J.D., Bay N., Loose E., Bankhead B., Davis J., Beals T.C., Bryan N.A., Burks R.T., and Greis P.E. Outpatient management of continuous peripheral nerve catheters placed using ultrasound guidance: an experience in 620 patients. Anesth Analg 103 (2006) 1436-1443