Minimally invasive dentistry using sonic and ultra-sonic devices in ultraconservative class 2 restorations

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 155-165

  Koubi, Stephen ^a   Tassery, Hervé ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Class 2 restoration; Minimally preventive restorative dentistry; Sonic insert; Ultrasonic insert

Indexed keywords

EID: 39449113963     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-2-155     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Bjorndal L, Mjör AI. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 4: Dental caries-Characteristics of lesions and pulpal reactions. Quintessence Int 2001; 32:717-36.
2. Axelsson P. In: Diagnosis and risk prediction of dental caries, Vol 2. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 1999.
3. Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Dynamic factors affecting lesion initiation and progression in human dental. The dynamic nature of enamel caries. Quintessence Int 1988; 19:683-711.
4. Maltz M, de Oliveira EF, Fontanella V, Bianchi R. A clinical, microbiologic, and radiographic study of deep caries lesions after incomplete caries removal. Quintessence Int 2001; 33:151-9.
5. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: Result at year 10. JADA 1998; 129:55-66.
6. Mount GJ, Hume WR. A revised classification of carious lesions by site and size. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:301-3.
7. Tassery H, Dejou J, Chafaie A, Camps J. In vivo diagnostic assessment of dentinal caries by junior and senior students using red acid dye. Eur J Dent Educ 2001; 5:38-42.
8. Rees ES, Messer H, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as the results of endodontic or restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15: 512-6.
9. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Do condensable composite help to achieve better proximal contacts?. Dent Mat 2001; 17:533-41.
10. Tassery H, de Donato P, Barrès O, Déjou J. In vitro assessment of polymerization procedures in class II restorations: Sealing, FTIR, and micro-hardness evaluations. J Adhesive Dent 2001; 3:247-255.
11. Beznos Z. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class 2 cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001; 26:60-9.
12. Wilson HF, Cawan A, Unterbrink G, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ. A clinical evaluation of classII composites placed using a decoupling technique. J Adhesive Dent 2000; 2:319-29.
13. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Dent Mat 2001; 17:359-66.
14. Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Déjou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhesive Dent 2001; 3:295-308.
15. Huguo B, Stassinakis A. preparation and restoration of small interproximal carious lesions with sonic instruments. Pract Periodontis Aesthet Dent 1998; 10:353-9.
16. Ericson D, Kidd E, McCom D, Mjör I, Noak MJ. Minimally Invasive Dentistry- Concepts and techniques in cariology. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003; 1:59-72.
17. de Castro FL, de Andrade MF, Duarte Júnior SL, Vaz LG, Ahid FJ. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on microtensile bond strength of composite to denite. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:129-38.
18. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. In vitro of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 2000; 34:144-50.
19. Wennerberg A, Sawase T, Kultje C. The influence of Carisolv on the enamel and dentin surface topography. Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107:297-306.
20. Axelsson P. In: An introduction to risk prediction and preventive dentistry. Others caries-preventive factors. Chapter 7. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 1999: 77-105.
21. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ. A technique for the removal of restoration overhangs and finishing and polishing of restoration and preparation margins. Quintessence Int 2001; 32:801-4.