Structural health monitoring and damage prognosis in fatigue

Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 37-49

  Kulkarni, S S ^a   Achenbach, J D ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Fatigue crack; Growth; Initiation; Inspections

Indexed keywords

EID: 39449102070     PISSN: 14759217     EISSN: 17413168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1475921707081973     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Farrar, C.R., Phillip, J.C., Hunter, N.F. and Lieven, N. (2005). Sensing and data acquisition systems, issues for damage prognosis. In: Inman, D.J., Farrar, C.R., Lopes Jr, V. and Steffen Jr, V. (eds), Damage Prognosis for Aerospace, Civil and Mechanical Systems, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp. 307-312.
2. Kulkarni, S.S., Sun, L., Moran, B., Krishnaswamy, S. and Achenbach, J.D. (2006). Probabilistic method to predict fatigue crack initiation. International Journal of Fracture, 137(1-4), 9-17.
3. Bogdanoff, J.L. and Kozin, F. (1995). Probabilistic Models of Cumulative Damage, New York: John Wiley.
4. Yang, J.N. and Manning, S.D. (1990). Stochastic crack growth analysis methodologies for metallic structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 37(5), 1105-1124.
5. Yang, J.N., Hsi, W.H. and Manning, S.D. (1987). Stochastic crack growth models for application to aircraft structures, In: Provan, J.W. (ed.), Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Reliability, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
6. Sobczyk, K. and Spencer Jr, B.F. (1992). Random Fatigue: From Data to Theory, New York: Academic Press, Inc.
7. Klesnil, M. and Lukas, P. (1992). Fatigue of Metallic Materials, 2nd edn, New York: Elsevier.
8. Suresh, S. (1991). Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Hikata, A. and Elbaum, C. (1966). Generation of ultrasonic second and third harmonics due to dislocations. Physical Review, 144(2), 469-477.
10. Ogi, H., Hirao, M. and Aoki, S. (2001). Noncontact monitoring of surface wave nonlinearity for predicting the remaining life of fatigue steels. Journal of Applied Physics, 90(1), 438-442.
11. Bjerager, J. (1989). Probability computation methods in structural and mechanical reliability. In: Liu, W.K. and Belytschko, T. (eds), Computational Mechanics of Probabilistic and Reliability Analysis, Lausanne: Elempress International, Vol. 47, p. 68.
12. Madsen, H.O., Krenk, S. and Lind, N.C. (1986). Methods of Structural Safety, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
13. Melchers, R.E. (1999). Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, 2nd edn, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Kiureghian, A. and Liu, P. (1989). Finite-Element reliability methods for geometrically nonlinear stochastic structures. Report No. UCB/ SEMM-89/05, University of California, Berkeley: Dept. of Civil Engineering.
15. Palmberg, B., Blom, A.F. and Eggwertz, S. (1987). Probabilistic damage tolerance analysis of aircraft structures. In: Provan, W. (ed.), Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Reliability, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
16. Paris, P.C. and Erdogen, F. (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation law. Journal of Basic Engineering, 85(Dec), 528-534.
17. Hahn, G.J. and Shapiro, S.S. (1967). Statistical Models in Engineering, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Moran, B., Xu, Y. and Achenbach, J.D. (2000). Limit-state surface element method: Application to fatigue reliability with NDE inspections. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(7), 684-692.
19. Espelid, T.O. (2002). Doubly adaptive quadrature routines based on Newton-Cotes rules. Report No. 229, University of Bergen, Norway: Dept. of Informatics.
20. Neuman, J. Jr. and Raju, I. (1981). An empirical stress-intensity factor equation for the surface crack. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 15(1-2), 185-192.
21. Shang-Xian, W. (1985). Shape change of surface cracks during fatigue growth. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 22(5), 897-913.