메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 192, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 154-

Author's reply: Harris et al make a number of claims

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; LETTER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VIOLENCE;

EID: 39449101163     PISSN: 00071250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.192.2.154a     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (3)

References (1)
  • 1
    • 0000333672 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy
    • Grove WM, Meehl PE. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychol Public Policy Law 1996; 2: 293-323.
    • (1996) Psychol Public Policy Law , vol.2 , pp. 293-323
    • Grove, W.M.1    Meehl, P.E.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.