Aurora conjugacy during substorms: Coordinated Antarctic ground and Polar Ultraviolet observations

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 106, Issue A11, 2001, Pages 24579-24591

  Vorobjev, V G ^a   Yagodkina, O I ^a   Sibeck, D ^b   Liou, K ^b   Meng, C I ^b  

^a POLAR GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39449096884     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2001ja900025     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baker, K. B., and S. Wing, A new magnetic coordinate system for conjugate studies at high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 9139, 1989.
2. Bond, F.R., Auroral morphological similarities at two magnetically conjugate stations: Buckles Bay Kotzebue, Aust. J. Phys., 22, 421,1969.
3. Borovsky, J.E., Auroral arc thicknesses as predicted By various theories, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 6101, 1993.
4. Burns, G.B., D.J. McEwen, R.A. Eather, F.T. Berkey, and J.S. Murphree, Optical auroral conjugacy: Viking UV imager - South Pole station ground data, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5781, 1990.
5. Cowley, S. W. H., Magnetospheric asymmetries associated with the Y-component of the IMF, Planet. Space Sci., 29, 79-96, 1981a.
6. Cowley, S.W.H., Asymmetry effects associated with the X-component of the IMF in a magnetically open magnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 29, 809, 1981b.
7. Cowley, S.W.H., J.P. Morelli, and M. Lockwood, Dependence of convective flows and particle precipitation in high-latitude dayside ionosphere on the X and Y components of interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5557, 1991.
8. Danilov, A.A., North-south asymmetry of geomagnetic activity, (in Russian) Geomagn. Aeron., 38, (3), 39, 1998.
9. Dickinson, D. F., S. B. Mende, and D. S. Evans, Dayside variation in auroral conjugacy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 68, 1986.
10. Elphinstone, R.D., K. Jankovska, J.S. Murphree, and L.L. Cogger, The configuration of the auroral distribution for interplanetary magnetic field Bz northward, 1, IMF Bx and By dependencies as observed by the Viking satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5791, 1990.
11. Fairfield, D.H., On the average configuration of the geomagnetic tail, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1950, 1979.
12. Feldstein, Y.I., A.E. Levitin, R.G. Afonina, and B.A. Belov, Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, in Interplanetary Medium and the Earth's Magnetosphere, pp. 64-116, Science, Moscow, 1982.
13. Frey, H.U., S.B. Mende, H.B. Vo, M. Brittnacher, and G.K. Parks, Conjugate observation of optical aurora with Polar satellite and ground-based cameras, Adv. Space Res., 23, 1647, 1999
14. Fujii, R., N. Sato, T. Ono, H. Fukunishi, T. Hirasawa, S. Kokobun, T. Araki, and T. Seamundsson, Conjugacies of pulsating aurora By all-sky TV observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 115, 1987.
15. Gelberg, M.G., Triggered substorms: Statistical investigation, Geomagn. Aeron., 38, (5), 43, 1998.
16. Heppner, J. P., Polar-cap electric field distributions related to the interplanetary magnetic field direction, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 4877, 1972.
17. Holzworth, R.H., and C.-I. Meng, Auroral boundary variation and the interplanetary magnetic field, Planet. Space Sci., 32, 25, 1984.
18. Hughes, W.J., and S.W.H. Cowley, Observation of IMF-associated magnetic field perturbations in the GSM X component at geostationary orbit, in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide, and J.A. Slavin, pp. 691 -695, Terra Sci., Tokyo, 1986.
19. Meng, C.-I., Polar cap variations and the interplanetary magnetic field, in Dynamics of the Magnetosphere, edited by S.-I. Akasofu, pp. 23-46, D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass., 1979.
20. Minatoya, H., N. Sato, T. Saemundsson, and T. Yoshino, Large displacement of conjugate auroras in the morning sectors, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 48, 967, 1987.
21. Mozer, F. S., W. D. Gonzalez, F. Bogott, M. C. Kelley, and S. Schutz, High-latitude electric fields and the three-dimensional interaction between the interplanetary and terrestrial magnetic fields, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 56, 1974.
22. Newell, P.T., C.-I. Meng, and K.M. Lyons, Suppression of discrete aurorae by sunlight, Nature, 381, 766, 1996.
23. Reiff, P.H., and J.G. Luhmann, Solar wind control of the polar-cap voltage, in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide, and J.A. Slavin, pp. 457-476, Terra Sci., Tokyo, 1986.
24. Sato, N., and T. Seamundsson, Conjugacy of electron auroras observed By all-sky cameras and scanning photometers, Mem. Natl. Inst. Polar Res. Jpn., 48, 58, 1987.
25. Sato, N., R. Fujii, T. Ono, H. Fukunishi, T. Hirasawa, T. Araki, S. Kokobun, K. Makita, and T. Seamundsson, Conjugacy of proton and electron auroras observed near L=6.1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 1368, 1986.
26. Sato, N., T. Nagaoka, K. Hashimoto, and T. Seamundsson, Conjugacy of isolated auroral arcs and nonconjugate auroral breakups, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 11,641, 1998.
27. Shelomentsev, V.V., Relation of north-south asymmetry of geomagnetic activity with the Y-component of the IMF, in Research on Geomagnetism, Aeronomy and Solar physics, vol. 43, pp. 55-59, Science, Moscow, 1977.
28. Siebert, M., Magnetic activity differences between the two hemispheres following the sector structure of the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 3049, 1968.
29. Stassinopoulos, E. G., L. J. Lanzerotti, and T. J. Rosenberg, Temporal variations in the Siple station conjugate area, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5655, 1984.
30. Stenbaek-Nielsen, H.C., and A. Otto, Conjugate auroras and the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 2223, 1997.
31. Stenbaek-Nielsen, H.C., T.N. Davis, and N.W. Glass, Relative motion of auroral conjugate points during substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 1844, 1972.
32. Stern, D. P., A study of the electric field in an open magnetospheric model, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 7292, 1973.
33. Vorobjev, V.G., and V.L. Zverev, Influence of solar wind parameters on the geomagnetic activity, (in Russian), Geomagn. Aeron., 22, (2), 257, 1982.
34. Wescott, E.M., Magnetoconjugate phenomena. Space Sci. Rev., 5, 507, 1966.
35. Wilcox, J.M., Asymmetry in geomagnetic response to the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 6835, 1968.
36. Wing, S., P.T. Newell, D.G. Sibeck, and K.B. Baker, A large statistical study of the entry of interplanetary magnetic field Y component into the magnetosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2083, 1995.