High-latitude magnetic reconnection in sub-Alfvénic flow: Interball Tail observations on May 29, 1996

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 106, Issue A12, 2001, Pages 29491-29502

  Avanov, L A ^a   Smirnov, V N ^a   Waite Jr , J H ^b   Fuselier, S A ^c   Vaisberg, O L ^a,d  

^a Department of Satellite Monitoring Technologies   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c LOCKHEED MARTIN   (United States)

^d NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39449094203     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000460     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Berchem, J., J. Raeder, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, Reconnection at magnetospheric boundary: Results from global magnetohydrodynamic simulation, in Physics of the Magnetopause, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 90, edited by P. Song, B. U. Ö Sonnerup, and M. F. Thomsen, p. 205, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1995.
2. Burch, J. L., P. H. Reiff, R. A. Hellis, R. W. Spiro, and S. A. Fields, Cusp region particle precipitation and ion convection for northward interplanetary magnetic field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 393, 1980.
3. Burch, J. L., P. H. Reiff, R. A. Heelis, J. D. Winningham, W. B. Hanson, C. Gurgiolo, J. D. Menietti, R. A. Hoffman, and J. N. Barfield, Plasma injection and transport in the mid-altitude polar cusp, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 921-924, 1982.
4. Cowley, S. W. H., The causes of convection in the Earth's magnetosphere: A review of developments during IMS, Rev. Geophys., 20, 531, 1982.
5. Crooker, N. U., Dayside merging and cusp geometry, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 951, 1919.
6. Denton, R. E., and J. G. Lyon, Effect of pressure anisotropy on the structure of a two-dimensional magnetosheath, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 7545, 2000.
7. Dungey, J. W., The structure of the exosphere or adventures in velocity space, in Geophysics: The Earth's Environment, edited by C. Dewitt, J. Hieblot, and A. Lebeau, p. 505, Gordon and Breach, Newark, N. J., 1963.
8. Fedder, J. A., et al., A first comparison of POLAR magnetic field measurements and magneto hydrodynamic simulation results for field-aligned currents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2491, 1997.
9. Fuselier, S. A., S. M. Petrinec, and K. J. Tratner, Stability of high-latitude reconnection site for steady northward IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 473, 2000a.
10. Fuselier, S. A., K. J. Tratner, and S. M. Petrinec, Cusp observations of high- and low-latitude reconnection for northward IMF, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 253, 2000b.
11. Gosling, J. T., M. F. Thomsen, S. J. Bame, R. C. Elphic, and C. T. Russell, Observations of reconnection of interplanetary and lobe magnetic field lines at high-latitude magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14,097, 1991.
12. Gosling, J. T., M. F. Thomsen, G. Le, and C. T. Russell, Observations of magnetic reconnection at the lobe magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2476, 1996.
13. Kessel, R. L., S.-H. Chen, J. L. Green, S. F. Fung, S. A. Boardsen, L. C. Tan, T. E. Eastmen, J. D. Craven, and L.A. Frank, Evidence of high-latitude reconnection during northward IMF: Hawkeye observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 583, 1996.
14. Khrabrov, A. V., and B. U. O. Sonnerup, Orientation and motion of current layers: Minimization of the Faraday residue, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2373-2376, 1998.
15. Klimov, S., S. Romanov, E. Amata, J. Blecki, et al., ASPI experiment. Measurements of fields and waves onboard the Interball-Tail mission, in Interball Mission and Payload, p. 120, Russ. Space Agency, Space Res. Inst., Cent. Natl. d'Etuds Spatiales, Toulouse, France, 1995.
16. Le, G., C. T. Russell, J. T. Gosling, and M. F. Thomsen, ISEE observations of low-latitude boundary layer for northward interplanetary magnetic field: Implications for cusp reconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 27,239, 1996.
17. Maezava, K., Magnetospheric convection induced by positive and negative Z component of the interplanetary magnetic field: Quantitative analysis using polar cap magnetic records, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 2289, 1976.
18. Matsuoka, A., K. Tsuruda, H. Haykawa, T. Mukai, and A. Nishida, Electric field structure and ion precipitation in the polar region associated with northward interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 10,711, 1996.
19. Omel'chnko, A. N., O. L. Vaisberg, and C.T. Russell, Further analysis of plasma bursts in Earth's boundary layer at high latitudes, Cosmic Res., 21, 687, 1983.
20. Onsager, T. G., M. F. Thomsen, R. C. Elphic, and J. T. Gosling, Model of electron and ion distributions in the plasma sheet boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 20,999, 1991.
21. Onsager, T. G., S.-W. Chang, J. D. Perez, J. B. Austin, and L. X. Janoo, Low-altitude observations and modeling of quasi-steady magnetopause reconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11,831, 1995.
22. Paschmann G., I. Papamastorakis, W. Baumjohan, N. Scopke, C. W. Carlson, B. U. Ö Sonnerup, and H. Lühr, The magneiopause for large magnetic shear: AMTE/IRM observations, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 11,099, 1986.
23. Petrinec, S. M., and C. T. Russell, External and internal influences on the size of the dayside terrestrial magnetosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 339, 1993.
24. Phan, T., and G. Paschmann, Low-latitude dayside magnetopause and boundary layer for high magnetic shear, 1, Structure and motion, J. Geophys. Res, 101, 7801-7815, 1996.
25. Richard, R. L., R. J. Walker, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, The population of the magnetosphere by solar wind ions when the interplanetary magnetic field is northward, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2453, 1994.
26. Rodger, A. S., I. J. Coleman, and M. Pinnock, Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1359, 2000.
27. Rosenbauer, H., H. Gruenwald, M. D. Montgomery, G. Paschmann, and N. Sckopke, HEOS 2 plasma observations in the distant polar magnetosphere: The plasma mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 2723, 1975.
28. Russell, C. T., The configuration of the magnetopause, in Critical Problems of Magnetospheric Physics, edited by E. R. Dryer, p. 1, Inter-Union Comm. on Sol.-Terr. Phys., Secr., Washington, D. C., 1972.
29. Scholer, M., Asymmetric time-dependent and stationary reconnection at the dayside magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 15,099, 1989.
30. Song, P., T. E. Holzer, C. T. Russell, and Z. Wang, Modeling the low-latitude boundary layer with reconnection entry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 625, 1994.
31. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., G. Paschmann, I. Papamastorakis, N. Scopke, G. Haerandel, S. J. Bame, J. R. Asbridge, J. T. Gosling, and C. T. Russell, Evidence for magnetic field reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 10,049, 1981.
32. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö, I. Papamastorakis, G. Paschmann, and H. Lühr, Magnetopause properties from AMPTE/IRM observations of the convection electric field: Method development, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 12,137, 1987.
33. Spreiter J. R., and S. S. Stahara, Magnetohydrodynamic and gasdynamic theories for planetary bow waves, in Collisionless Shocks in the Heliosphere: Reviews of Current Research, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 35, edited by B. T. Tsurutani and R. G. Stone, p. 85, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1985.
34. Terazawa, T., et al., On the determination of moving MHD structure: Minimization of the residue of integrated Faraday's equation, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 48, 608-613, 1996.
35. Tsyganenko, N. A., Effects of the solar wind conditions on the global magnetospheric configuration as deduced from data-based field models, in Proceedings of the ICS-3 Conference on Substorms, Eur. Space Agency Spec. Publ. 389, 181, 1996.
36. Vaisberg, O. L., et al., Complex plasma analyzer SCA-1, in Interball Mission and Payload, Russ. Space Agency., p. 170, Space Res. Inst., Cent. Nat. d'Etuds Spatiàles, Toulouse, France, 1995.
37. Woch, J., and R. Lundin, Magnetosheath plasma precipitation in the polar cusp and its control by the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 1421, 1992.