Association between foot type and tibial stress injuries: A systematic review

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 93-98

  Barnes, A ^a   Wheat, Jonathan ^a   Milner, C ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CINAHL; DATA BASE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FOOT INJURY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; STRESS; STRESS FRACTURE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TIBIA;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOOT; FRACTURES, STRESS; HUMANS; MALE; RISK FACTORS; TIBIAL FRACTURES;

EID: 39449092003     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.036533     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Bennell K, Matheson G, Meeuwisse W, et al. Risk factors for stress fractures. Sports Med 1999;28:91-122.
2. Arendt E, Agel J, Heikes C, et al. Stress injuries to bone in college athletes. A retrospective review of experience at a single institution. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:959-68.
3. Matheson GO, Clement DB, Mckenzie DC. Stress fractures in athletes. A study of 320 cases. Am J Sports Med 1987;15:46-58.
4. McBryde AM. Stress fractures in runners. Clin Sports Med 1985;4:737-52.
5. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Mourtada FA, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry for stress fracture prediction in male U.S. marine corps recruits. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:645-53.
6. Hershman E, Mailly T. Stress fractures. Clin Sports Med 1990;9:183-214.
7. Nattiv A, Armsey TD. Stress injury to bone in the female athlete. Clin Sports Med 1997;16:197-224.
8. Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, et al. Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006;38:323-8.
9. Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffman KL, et al. Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med 1995;23:472-81.
10. Jones BH, Harris JM, Vinh TN, et al. Exercise-induced stress fractures and stress reactions of bone: epidemiology, etiology, and classification. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1989;17:379-422.
11. Milgrom C, Chisin R, Giladi M. Negative bone scans in impending tibial stress fractures. A report of three cases. Am J Sports Med 1984;12:488-91.
12. Kowal DM. Nature and causes of injuries in women resulting from an endurance training program. Am J Sports Med 1980;8:265-9.
13. Scully TJ, Besterman G. Stress fracture: a preventable training injury. Mil Med 1982;147:285-7.
14. Greaney RB, Gerber FH, Laughlin RL. Distribution and natural history of stress fractures in U.S. marine recruits. Radiology 1983;146:339-46.
15. Montgomery LC, Nelson FRT, Norton JP, et al. Orthopaedic history and examination in the etiology of overuse injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989;21:237-43.
16. Lysholm J, Wiklander J. Injuries in runners. Am J Sports Med 1987;15:168-71.
17. Cowan DN, Jones BH, Robinson JR. Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. Arch Fam Med 1993;2:773-7.
18. Giladi M, Milgrom C, Stein M. The low arch, a protective factor in stress fractures. A prospective study of 295 military recruits. Orthop Rev 1985;14:709-12.
19. Simkin A, Leichter I, Giladi M, et al. Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot Ankle 1989;10:25-9.
20. Razeghi M, Batt ME. Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait Posture 2002;15:282-91.
21. Sullivan D, Warren RF, Pavlov H, et al. Stress fractures in 51 runners. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;187:188-92.
22. Ellwood M. Confounding in critical appraisal of epidemiological studies and clinical trials. In: Ellwood M, ed. Critical appraisal of epidemiological studies and clinical trials. 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press, 2000:145-6.
23. Crombie I. The pocket guide to critical appraisal: a handbook for health care professionals. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1996.
24. Mackay M, Scalan A, Olsen L. Sports and recreational injury prevention strategies: systematic review and best practices: executive summary. Vancouver: BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, 2001.
25. Ekenman I, Tsai Fellander L, Westblad P, et al. A study of intrinsic factors in patients with stress fractures of the tibia. Foot Ankle Int 1996;17:477-82.
26. Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, et al. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:95-101.
27. Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, et al. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:585-93.
28. Busseuil C, Freychat P, Guedj EB, et al. Rearfoot-forefoot orientation and traumatic risk for runners. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19:32-7.
29. Korpelainen R, Orava S, Karpakka J, et al. Risk factors for recurrent stress fractures in athletes. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:304-10.
30. Williams DS, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomech 2001;16:341-7.
31. Subotnick SI. The biomechanics of running. Implications for the prevention of foot injuries. Sports Med 1985;2:144-53.
32. Brown LP, Yavorsky P. Locomotor biomechanics and pathomechanics: a review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987;9:3-10.
33. Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Hamill CL. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983;15:376-81.
34. Pratt DJ. Mechanisms of shock attenuation via the lower extremity during running. Clin Biomech 1989;4:51-7.
35. Perry SD, Lafortune MA. Influences of inversion/eversion of the foot upon impact loading during locomotion. Clin Biomech 1995;10:253-7.
36. Zifchock RA, Davis I, Hillstrom H, et al. The effect of gender, age, and lateral dominance on arch height and arch stiffness. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27:367-72.
37. Davis RB, Õunpuu S, Tyburski D, et al. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 1991;10:575-87.
38. Lundberg A, Goldie I, Kalin B, et al. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: Plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle 1989;9:194-200.
39. Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, et al. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex. Part 2: Pronation and supination. Foot Ankle 1989;9:248-53.
40. Nester C, Bowker P, Bowden P. Kinematics of the midtarsal joint during standing leg rotation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002;92:77- 81.
41. Davis IS. Foot and ankle research retreat: consensus statement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004;34:A2-4.
42. Khazzam M, Long JT, Marks RM, et al. Preoperative gait characterization of patients with ankle arthrosis. Gait Posture 2006;24:85-93.
43. Woodburn J, Nelson KM, Siegel KL, et al. Multisegment foot motion during gait: proof of concept in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004;31:1918-27.
44. Cavanagh PR, Morag E, Boulton AJM, et al. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech 1997;30:243-50.
45. Hamil J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM, et al. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech 1989;4:217-25.
46. Hennig EM, Milani TL. The 'tripod' theory of foot loading. A pressure distribution analysis for static and dynamic loads. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1993;131:279-84.
47. Cowan DN, Robinson JR, Jones BH, et al. Consistency of visual assessments of arch height among clinicians. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:213-7.
48. Dahle LK, Mueller M, Delitto A, et al. Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991;14:70-4.
49. Hawes MR, Nachbauer W, Sovak D, et al. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle 1992;13:22-6.
50. Hamill J, Davis I. Can we learn more from prospective or retrospective studies? [abstract]. J Biomech 2006;39(Suppl 1):S173.
51. Funk DA, Cass JR, Johnson KA. Acquired adult flat foot secondary to posterior tibial-tendon pathology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:95-102.