-
1
-
-
20544456139
-
Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine
-
Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C. Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:1042-1047.
-
(2005)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.142
, pp. 1042-1047
-
-
Shekelle, P.G.1
Morton, S.C.2
Suttorp, M.J.3
Buscemi, N.4
Friesen, C.5
-
2
-
-
0141651858
-
Fables or foibles: Inherent problems with RCTs
-
Rosner A. Fables or foibles: Inherent problems with RCTs. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:460-467.
-
(2003)
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
, vol.26
, pp. 460-467
-
-
Rosner, A.1
-
3
-
-
0042522960
-
Spinal palpation: The challenges of information retrieval using available databases
-
Murphy LS, Reinsch S, Najm WI, Dickerson VM, Seffinger MA, Adams A, Mishra SI. Spinal palpation: The challenges of information retrieval using available databases. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:374-382.
-
(2003)
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
, vol.26
, pp. 374-382
-
-
Murphy, L.S.1
Reinsch, S.2
Najm, W.I.3
Dickerson, V.M.4
Seffinger, M.A.5
Adams, A.6
Mishra, S.I.7
-
4
-
-
0041474955
-
Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses
-
Montori VM, Swiontowski MF, Cook DJ. Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Orthop 2003;413:43-54.
-
(2003)
Clin Orthop
, vol.413
, pp. 43-54
-
-
Montori, V.M.1
Swiontowski, M.F.2
Cook, D.J.3
-
5
-
-
84880283918
-
Reading systematic reviews
-
Peach H. Reading systematic reviews. Aust Fam Physician 2002;31:1-5.
-
(2002)
Aust Fam Physician
, vol.31
, pp. 1-5
-
-
Peach, H.1
-
6
-
-
85036922885
-
-
Donelson R. Rapidly Reversible Low Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Pathway to Widespread Recoveries and Savings. Hanover, NH: Self Care First, 2007.
-
Donelson R. Rapidly Reversible Low Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Pathway to Widespread Recoveries and Savings. Hanover, NH: Self Care First, 2007.
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
1542667166
-
Statistical relevance
-
Fardon DF, ed, 2nd ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
-
nd ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2002.
-
(2002)
Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Spine
-
-
Spratt, K.1
-
8
-
-
34248590238
-
Clinical prediction rules: Time to sacrifice the holy cow of specificity?
-
Huijbregts PA. Clinical prediction rules: Time to sacrifice the holy cow of specificity? J Manual Manipulative Ther 2007;15:5-8.
-
(2007)
J Manual Manipulative Ther
, vol.15
, pp. 5-8
-
-
Huijbregts, P.A.1
-
9
-
-
0037115159
-
A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation
-
Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, Wainner R, Magel J, Rendeiro D, et al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 2002;27:2835-2843.
-
(2002)
Spine
, vol.27
, pp. 2835-2843
-
-
Flynn, T.1
Fritz, J.2
Whitman, J.3
Wainner, R.4
Magel, J.5
Rendeiro, D.6
-
10
-
-
19944367269
-
A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study
-
Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Mem Med 2004;141:920-928.
-
(2004)
Ann Mem Med
, vol.141
, pp. 920-928
-
-
Childs, J.D.1
Fritz, J.M.2
Flynn, T.W.3
Irrgang, J.J.4
Johnson, K.K.5
Majkowski, G.R.6
Delitto, A.7
-
11
-
-
33748489353
-
Clinical prediction rules: What are they and what do they tell us?
-
Beattie P, Nelson R. Clinical prediction rules: What are they and what do they tell us? Aust J Physiother 2006;52:157-163.
-
(2006)
Aust J Physiother
, vol.52
, pp. 157-163
-
-
Beattie, P.1
Nelson, R.2
|