Support vector machine as an efficient tool for high-dimensional data processing: Application to substorm forecasting

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 106, Issue A12, 2001, Pages 29911-29914

  Gavrishchaka, Valeriy V ^a   Ganguli, Supriya B ^a  

^a SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39449088098     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2001ja900118     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bishop, C. M., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1995.
2. Chang, C.-C., C.-W. Hsu, and C.-J. Lin, The analysis of decomposition methods for support vector machines, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 11, 1003, 2000.
3. Chang, T., Self-organized criticality, multi-fractal spectra, sporadic localized reconnections and intermittent turbulence in the magnetotail, Phys. Plasmas, 6, 4137, 1999.
4. Cristianini, N., and J. Shawe-Taylor, Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2000.
5. Fedder, J. A., J. G. Lyon, S. P. Slinker, and C. M. Mobarry, Topological structure of the magnetotail as a function of interplanetary magnetic field direction, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 3613, 1995.
6. Gavrishchaka, V. V., and S. B. Ganguli, Optimization of the neutral-network geomagnetic model for forecasting large-amplitude substorm events, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 6247, 2001.
7. Gleisner, H., and H. Lundstedt, Response of the auroral electrojets to the solar wind modeled with neural networks, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 14,269, 1997.
8. Gleisner, H., H. Lundstedt, and P. Wintoft, Predicting geomagnetic storms from solar-wind data using time-delay neural networks, Ann. Geophys., 14, 679, 1996.
9. Haykin, S. S., Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1998.
10. Horton, W., and I. Doxas, A low-dimensional dynamical model for the solar wind driven geotail-ionosphere system, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4561, 1998.
11. Horton, W., et al., The solar-wind driven magnetosphere-ionosphere as a complex dynamical system, Phys. Plasmas, 6, 4178, 1999.
12. Joselyn, J. A., Geomagnetic activity forecasting: The state of the art, Rev. Geophys., 33, 383, 1995.
13. Klimas, A. J., D. Vassiliadis, D. N. Baker, and D. A. Roberts, The organized nonlinear dynamics of the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13,089, 1996.
14. Principe, J. C., N. R. Euliano, and W. C. Lefebvre, Neural and Adaptive Systems, John Wiley, New York, 2000.
15. Opper, M., and R. Urbanczik, Universal learning curves of support vector machines, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 4410, 2001.
16. Rosenblatt, F., The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psych. Rev., 65, 386, 1958.
17. Schunk, R. W., and J. J. Sojka, The global ionosphere-polar wind system during changing magnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 11,625, 1997.
18. Sharma, A. S., Assesing the nonlinear behavior of the magnetosphere: Its dimension is low, its predictability is high, Rev. Geophys., 33, 645, 1995.
19. Vapnik, V., The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.
20. Vapnik, V., Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley, New York, 1998.
21. Vapnik, V., and A. Chervonenkis, On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities, Theor. Probab. Appl., 16(2), 264, 1971.
22. Weigel, R. S., W. Horton, T. Tajima, and T. Detman, Forecasting auroral electrojet activity from solar wind input with neural networks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1353, 1999.