Measurement system analysis for bounded ordinal data

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 383-395

  De Mast, Jeroen ^a   Van Wieringen, Wessel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attribute data; Gauge R R study; Intraclass correlation coefficient; Kappa method

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ATTRIBUTE DATA; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; GAUGE R & R STUDY; INDUSTRIAL STATISTICS; KAPPA METHOD; STANDARD DEVIATION;

MEASUREMENT THEORY;

EID: 3943113618     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.653     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA, 1979.
2. Montgomery DC, Runger GC. Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part I: Basic methods. Quality Engineering 1993;6:115-135.
3. Montgomery DC, Runger GC. Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part II: Experimental design methods and variance component estimation. Quality Engineering 1993; 6:289-305.
4. Kerlinger FN, Lee HB. Foundations of Behavioral Research (4th edn). Harcourt: New York, 2000.
5. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley: London, 1968.
6. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing measurement reliability. Psychological Bulletin 1979; 86:420-428.
7. Vardeman SB, VanValkenburg ES. Two-way random effects analyses and Gauge R&R studies. Technometrics 1999; 41:202-211.
8. AIAG. Measurement System Analysis; Reference Manual (3rd edn). Automotive Industry Action Group: Detroit, MI, 2002.
9. Wheeler DJ. Problems with Gauge R&R studies. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions 1992; 46:179-185.
10. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20:37-46.
11. Conger AJ. Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters. Psychological Bulletin 1980; 88:322-328.
12. Dunn G. Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies. Edward Arnold: London, 1989.
13. Kendall M, Gibbons JD. Rank Correlation Methods (5th edn). Edward Arnold: London, 1990.
14. Feldstein FL, Davis HT. Poisson models for assessing rater agreement in discrete response studies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1984; 37:49-61.
15. Agresti AA. A model for agreement between ratings on an ordinal scale. Biometrics 1988; 44:539-548.
16. Uebersax JS, Grove WM. A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement. Biometrics 1993; 49:823-835.
17. Vanleeuwen DM, Mandabach KH. A note on the reliability of ranked items. Sociological Methods and Research 2002; 31:87-105.
18. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 1968; 70:213-220.
19. Krippendorff K. Bivariate agreement coefficients for reliability of data. Sociological Methodology, Borgatta EF (ed.). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, 1970; 139-150.
20. Kendall M, Stuart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics (4th edn), vol. 1. Charles Griffin: London, 1977; 77-82.