Three-dimensional localization of defects in stay cables using magnetic flux leakage methods

Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 93-101

  Christen, R ^a   Bergamini, A ^a   Motavalli, M ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Magnetic flux leakage; Magneto inductive; Nondestructive evaluation; Stay cables; Three dimensional (3D) localization

Indexed keywords

DEFECTS; INSPECTION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC LEAKAGE; NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION;

MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE; MAGNETOINDUCTIVE; THREE DIMENSIONAL LOCALIZATION;

BRIDGE CABLES;

EID: 3943106189     PISSN: 01959298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:JONE.0000010736.74285.b6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. F. Förster, New findings in the field of non-destructive magnetic leakage field inspection, NDT Int., 19:3-14 (1986).
2. H. R. Weischedel, The inspection of wire ropes in service: A critical review, Mater. Eval., 43:1592-1605 (1985).
3. R. K. Stanley, Simple explanation of the theory of the total magnetic-flux method for the measurement of ferromagnetic cross-sections, Mater. Eval., 53:72-75 (1995).
4. S. Mandayam, L. Udpa, S. S. Udpa, and W. Lord, Wavelet-based permeability compensation technique for characterizing magnetic flux leakage images, NDTE Int., 30:297-303 (1997).
5. A. Bergamini, Nondestructive testing of stay cables, In Proc. IABSE Conf. On Suspended Bridges, Seoul, Korea, CD ROM, IABSE (2001).
6. A. Bergamini, Nondestructive testing of stay cables - field experience in South East Asia, Proc. 3WCSC, Como, ItalyWiley, 2002.
7. J. C. Slater and N. H. Frank, Electromagnetism, Revised Edition (Dover Publications, New York, 1969), pp. 75-77.
8. V. E. Shcherbinin and N. N. Zatsepin, Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. I. Field topography of defect models, Defectoscopy, 5:385-393 (1966).
9. V. E. Shcherbinin and N. N. Zatsepin, Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. II. Experimental verification of the principal theoretical relationships, Defectoscopy, 5:394-399 (1966).
10. O. Karlqvist, Calculation of the magnetic field in the ferromagnetic layer of a magnetic drum, In Transactions of the Royal Institute of Technology (Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, Göteborg, 1954).
11. D. Minkov, J. Lee, and T. Shoji, Study of crack inversions utilizing dipole model of a crack and Hall element measurements, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 217:207-215 (2000).
12. L. J. Swartzendruber, Magnetic leakage and force fields for artificial defects in magnetic particle test rings, In Proceedings of the XII Symposium on NDE. (SWRI, San Antonio, TX, 1979), pp. 150-161.
13. L. J. Swartzendruber, Comments on the calibration and use of the NIST test ring (SRM 1853), Mater. Eval., 6:594-596 (1999).
14. D. E. Bray and R. K. Stanley, Nondestructive Evaluation, Revised Edition (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997), pp. 303-310.
15. D. M. Bates and D. G. Watts, Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988).
16. D. A. Ratkowsky, Nonlinear Regression Modeling, A Unified Practical Approach (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983).
17. D. L. Atherton and W. Czura, Finite element calculations on the effects of permeability variation on magnetic flux leakage signals, NDT Int., 20:239-241 (1987).
18. D. L. Atherton and M. G. Daly, Finite element calculation of magnetic flux leakage detector signals, NDT Int., 20:235-238 (1987).
19. L. Luming, Z. Jiajun, L. Zhenxing, and S. Xiaoyan, Using finite element method to optimize magnetic flux leakage testing, In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (New Dehli, 1996), pp. 1589-1592 (Ashgate Publishing Company, Aldershot, U.K.).
20. J. P. Webb and B. Forghani, DC current distributions and magnetic fields using the T-omega edge-element method, IEEE Trans Magnetics, 31:1444-1447 (1995).