Self-scheduling and energy bidding in competitive electricity markets

Electric Power Systems Research

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 203-209

  Yamin, H Y ^a   Shahidehpour, S M ^b  

^a YARMOUK UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

^b Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Bidding strategies; Competitive electricity market; Lagrangian augmentation and congestion; Self scheduling

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; COSTS; CURVE FITTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RELAXATION PROCESSES; SCHEDULING;

ELECTRICITY MARKET; ENERGY BIDDING; LAGRANGIAN AUGMENTATION; SELF-SCHEDULING;

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY;

EID: 3943073807     PISSN: 03787796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2004.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Deeb N., Shahidehpour S.M. Cost minimization in allocation of reactive power sources. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 12(4):1990;263-270.
2. Abdul-Rahman K.H., Shahidehpour S.M., Agangic M., Mokhtari S. A practical resource scheduling with OPF constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 11(1):1996;254-259.
3. Wang S.J., Shahidehpour S.M., Kirschen D.S., Mokhtari S., Irisarri G.D. Short-term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented Lagrangian relaxation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 10(3):1995;1294-1301.
4. Ferrero R., Shahidehpour S.M. Dynamic economic dispatch in deregulated systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 19(7):1997;433-439.
5. Ma H., Shahidehpour S.M. Unit commitment with transmission security and voltage constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 14:1999;757-764.
6. M.E. El-Hawary, G.S. Christensen, Optimal Economic Operation of Electric Power Systems, Academic Press, New York, 1979.
7. Batut J., Renaud A. Daily generation scheduling optimization with transmission constraints: a new class of algorithms. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 7(3):1992;982-989.
8. Anderson B., Bergman L. Market structure and the price of electricity: an ex ante analysis of deregulated Swedish markets. Energy J. 16(2):1995;97-109.
9. Berry C., Hobbs B., Meroney W., O'Neill R., Stewart W. Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach. Utilities Policy. 8(3):1999;139-158.
10. Borenstein S., Bushnell J. An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California's electricity industry. J. Ind. Econ. 47(3):1999;285-323.
11. Hobbs B., Metzler C., Pang J. Calculating equilibria in imperfectly competitive power markets: an MPEC approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15(2):2000;638-645.
12. Jing-Yuan W., Smeers Y. Spatial oligopolistic electricity models with cournot generators and regulated transmission prices. Operations Res. 47(1):1999;102-112.
13. Lamont J., Rajan S. Strategic bidding in an energy brokerage. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 12(4):1997;1729-1733.
14. P. Skantze, M. Ilic, J. Chapman, Stochastic modeling of electric power prices in a multi-market environment, in: Proceedings of the IEEE PES Winter Meeting, Singapore, 2000.
15. Song H., Liu C., Lawaree J., Dahlgren R. Optimal electricity supply bidding by Markov decision process. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15(2):2000;618-624.
16. Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee, IEEE Reliability Test System, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Systems PAS-98 (6) (1979) 2047-2054.
17. H.Y. Yamin, Deregulated System Data, available at the following web site: http://www.iit.edu/~yamihat/, 2002.