Specialty cropland in California

Geographical Review

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 153-170

  Hart, John Fraser ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Dairy farming; Farmland preservation; Specialty crops; Urban encroachment

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CROP PRODUCTION; LAND USE; URBAN GROWTH;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3943073189     PISSN: 00167428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2003.tb00027.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Becker, E. 2002. California Farmers Reconsidering Opposition to Subsidies. New York Times, 8 April, §A, 14.
2. Borchert, J. R. 1991. Futures of American Cities. In Our Changing Cities, edited by John Fraser Hart, 218-250. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. California Agriculture. 2003. Central Valley Growers Pulling Grapevines. California Agriculture 57 (3): 70.
4. D'Arrigo, J. 1998. Interview with the author. Salinas, Calif., 8 December.
5. Fielding, G. J. 1962. Dairying in Cities Designed to Keep People Out. Professional Geographer 14 (1): 12-17.
6. Fletcher, L. B., and C. O. McCorkle Jr. 1963. Growth and Adjustment of the Los Angeles Milkshed: A Study in the Economics of Location. Station Bulletin 787. Davis, Calif.: University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences.
7. Godinho, J. 1998. Interview with the author. Chino, Calif., 10 December.
8. Handel, M. E. 1998. Conflicts Arise on the Urban Fringe. California Agriculture 52 (3): 11-16.
9. Hart, J. F. 1991. The Perimetropolitan Bow Wave. Geographical Review 81 (1): 35-51.
10. Hart, J. F. 2001. Half a Century of Cropland Change. Geographical Review 91 (3): 525-543.
11. Hart, J. F. 2003. The Changing Scale of American Agriculture. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
12. Heien, D., and P. Martin. 2003. California's Wine Industry Enters New Era. California Agriculture 57 (3): 71-75.
13. Heimlich, R. E., and W. D. Anderson. 2001. Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
14. McElhiney, M. A., and G. J. Romito. 1992. Soil Survey of San Joaquin County, California. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
15. Medvitz, A. G. 1998. Urban Growth Squeezes Agriculture. California Agriculture 52 (3): 8-9.
16. Moore, M. C. 1998. Permissive Growth Policies May Encourage Speculative Investment in Farmland. California Agriculture 52 (3): 23-27.
17. Murphy, D. E. 2002a. California Vote Threatens Deal on Colorado River. New York Times, 11 December, §A, 24.
18. Murphy, D. E. 2002b. Southern California Water Officials Race Deadline of Tonight. New York Times, 31 December, §A, 14.
19. Murphy, D. E. 2003a. In a First, U.S. Officials Put Limits on California's Thirst. New York Times, 5 January, §A, 1, 16.
20. Murphy, D. E. 2003b. California Grape Rush of 90's Withers as Prices Collapse. New York Times, 25 May, §A, 1, 26.
21. Nieves, E. 2001. Toxic Drug Labs Hide in Fertile California Valley. New York Times, 13 May, §A, 1, 24.
22. Ramsey, B. 1998. Interview with the author. Salinas, Calif., 8 December.
23. Sanders, S. 1998. Statewide Farmland Protection Is Fragmented. California Agriculture 52 (3): 5-7, 9-11.
24. Sokolow, A. 1998a. Steering a Course on Farmland Protection. California Agriculture 52 (3): 2, 4.
25. Sokolow, A. 1998b. North Bay Leads Central Valley in Protecting Farmland. California Agriculture 52 (3): 17-22.
26. Sokolow, A., and C. Lemp. 2002. Saving Agriculture or Saving the Environment? California Agriculture 56 (1): 9-14.
27. Splansky, J. 1997. Historical and Contemporary Geography of Dairying in the Los Angeles Area. Unpublished manuscript, California State University, Long Beach.
28. Sterngold, J. 1999. Urban Sprawl Benefits Dairies in California. New York Times, 22 October, §A, 14.
29. Stubblefield, R. 1997. Interview with the author. Belle Glade, Fla., 17 September.
30. Tanimura, G. 1998. Interview with the author. Salinas, Calif., 8 December.
31. U.S. Census Bureau. 1952. United States Census of Agriculture: 1950. Vol. 1, Counties and State Economic Areas. Part 33, California. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
32. U.S. Census Bureau. 1967. 1964 United States Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, State and County Statistics. Part 48, California. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
33. U.S. Census Bureau. 1972. 1969 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, Area Reports. Part 48, California. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
34. U.S. Census Bureau. 1977. 1974 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, State and County Statistics. Part 5, California. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
35. U.S. Census Bureau. 1981. 1978 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, State and County Data. Part 5, California. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
36. U.S. Census Bureau. 1989. 1987 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, Geographic Area Series. Part 5, California (AC87-A-5). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of the Census.
37. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 1999. 1997 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, Geographic Area Series. Part 5, California, State and County Data (AC97-A-5). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
38. Verhoeven, R. 2002. Interview with the author. Chino, Calif., 22 March.
39. Vink, E. 1998. Land Trusts Conserve California Farmland. California Agriculture 52 (3): 27-31.
40. Whitaker, B. 2003. Prospects Good and III for Troubled Salton Sea. New York Times, 5 July, §A, 8.
41. Whittlesey, D. 1936. Major Agricultural Regions of the World. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 26 (1): 199-240.