Impact of a migraine disease management program: Humanistic outcomes

Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 273-280

  Hu, Henry X ^a   Solomon, Glen D ^b   Conboy, Kathleen ^c   Deml, Lisa ^c   Markson, Leona E ^a  

^a MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Medica   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVALUATION; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MIGRAINE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 3943070308     PISSN: 11738790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00115677-200412040-00007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Saper JR. Diagnosis and symptomatic treatment of migraine. Headache 1997; 37 Suppl. 1: S1-S14
2. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, et al. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001; 41 (7): 646-57
3. Osterhaus JT, Townsend RJ, Gandek B, et al. Measuring the functional status and well being of patients with migraine headache. Headache 1994; 34: 337-43
4. Solomon GD, Price KL. Burden of migraine: a review of its socioeconomic impact. Pharmacoeconomics 1997; 11 Suppl. 1: 1-10
5. Clouse JC, Osterhaus JT. Healthcare resource use and costs associated with migraine in a managed healthcare setting. Ann Pharmacother 1994; 28: 659-64
6. Hu X, Markson LE, Lipton RB, et al. Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 813-8
7. Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Stewart WF. An update on the epidemiology of migraine. Headache 1994; 34: 319-28
8. Edmeads J, Findlay H, Tugwell P, et al. Impact of migraine and tension-type headache on lifestyle, consulting behaviour and medication use: a Canadian population survey. Can J Neurol Sci 1993; 20: 131-7
9. Hu X, O'Donnell F, Kunkel RS, et al. Survey of migraineurs referred to headache specialists: care, satisfaction, and outcomes. Neurology 2000; 55: 141-3
10. Lipton RB, Amatniek J, Gross M, et al. Identifying and removing barriers to care. Neurology 1994; 44 Suppl. 4: 63-8
11. Pryse-Phillips W, Dodic DW, Edmeads JG, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of migraine in clinical practice. CMAJ 1997; 156: 1273-87
12. Solomon GD, Cady R, Klapper J, et al. National Headache Foundation: standards of care for treating headache in primary care practice. Cleve Clin J Med 1997; 64: 373-83
13. Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2000; 55: 754-62
14. Dowson AJ, Lipscombe S, Sender J, et al. New guidelines for the management of migraine in primary care. Curr Med Res Opin 2002; 18 (7): 414-39
15. Epstein RS, Sherwood LM. From outcomes research to disease management: a guide for the perplexed. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 832-7
16. Data on file, Merck & Co., Inc, 1999
17. Solomon G, Hu X, Simmons R, et al. Development of migraine disease management initiative in a managed care plan. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2002; 10: 167-73
18. Chatterton ML, Lofland JH, Shechter A, et al. Reliability and validity of the migraine therapy assessment questionnaire (MTAQ). Headache 2002; 42: 1006-15
19. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Whyte J, et al. An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology 1999; 53 (5): 988-94
20. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12®: how to score the SF-12® physical and metal health summary scales. 3rd ed. Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric Incorporated, 1998
21. International classification of diseases 9th revision, clinical modification. Salt Lake City (UT): Utah Medicode Incorporated, 1997