Anti-dumping policy after the Uruguay round-an appraisal

National Institute Economic Review

Volumn 155, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 98-105

  Grimwade, Nigel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3943052941     PISSN: 00279501     EISSN: 17413036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002795019615500107     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baldwin R.E. and Steagall J.W. (1994), An analysis of US international trade commission decisions in antidumping, countervailing duty and safeguard cases, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper no. 990.
2. Barrell R. and Pain N. (1996), Trade restraints and Japanese direct investment flows, European Economic Review, forthcoming.
3. Bhagwati J. (1988), Protectionism, Cambridge, Massachussettes and London, England: MIT Press.
4. Bourgeois J. and Messerlin P. (1993), Competition and antidumping regulations, mimeo, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris. Davenport M. (1989), 'The charybdis of anti-dumping: a new form of EC industrial policy?', Royal Institute of International Affairs Discussion Paper 22, Chatham House, London.
5. Devault J. (1990), The administration of US anti-dumping duties: some empirical observations, The World Economy, vol. 13, no. 1.
6. Finger J. and Olechowski A. (eds) (1987), The Uruguay Round, A Handbook for the Multilateral Trade Negotiations, World Bank, Washington DC.
7. General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade (GATT) (1979), Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (The Anti-Dumping Code).
8. General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade (GATT) (1994), Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round Multilateral Trade Negotiations.
9. Heitger B. and Stehn J. (1990), 'Japanese direct investments in the EC-response to the internal market 1993?', Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. XXIX, no. 1.
10. Hindley B. (1988), Dumping and the Far East trade of the EC, The World Economy, vol. 11, no. 4.
11. Hindley B. (1994), 'Two cheers for the Uruguay Round', Trade Policy Review 1994, Centre for Policy Studies.
12. Hoekamn B. and Mavroidis P. (1994), Antitrust-based remedies and dumping in international trade, Centre For Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper no. 1010.
13. Messerlin P. (1989), The EC antidumping regulations: a first economic appraisal, 1980-5, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 125.
14. Messerlin P. (1990), Anti-dumping regulations or pro-cartel law? The EC chemical cases, The World Economy, vol. 13.
15. Messerlin P. and Reed G. (1995), Antidumping policies in the United States and the European Community, The Economic Journal, vol. 105, no. 433.
16. Morkre M.E. and Kelly K.H. (1994), Effects Of Unfair Imports On Domestic Industries: US Antidumping And Countervailing Duty Cases, 1980 To 1988, Washington DC: Bureau Of Economics, Federal Commission.
17. National Consumer Council (NCC)/Grimwade (1990), Consumer electronics and the EC's anti-dumping policy, Working Paper 1, International Trade And The Consumer, NCC, London.
18. Schott J. (1994), The Uruguay Round: An Assessment, Institute For International Economics, Washington DC.
19. Stegemann K. (1989), EC anti-dumping policy; are price undertakings a legal substitute for illegal price-fixing?, paper presented to the International Workshop On Policy Implications Of Anti-Dumping Measures, European Institute For Advanced Studies In Management, Brussels, 19-20 October, 1989.
20. Tharakan P.K.M. (1995), Political economy and contingent protection, The Economic Journal, vol. 105, no. 433.
21. Usitc (1995), The Economic Effects Of Antidumping And Countervailing Duty Orders And Suspension Agreements, Washington DC: United States International Trade Commission.