Susceptibility to impulse noise trauma in different species: Guinea pig, rat and mouse

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 277-283

  Duan, Maoli ^a,b,c   Laurell, Göran ^b,e   Qiu, Jianxin ^a,b,c   Borg, Erik ^d  

^a Center for Hearing and Communication Research   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c Anhui Medical University   (Sweden)

^d ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Guinea pig; Hearing; Impulse noise; Inner ear; Mouse; Rat; Species; Susceptibility

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; GUINEA PIG; HEARING; INNER EAR; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NOISE; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RAT STRAIN;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY FATIGUE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; GUINEA PIGS; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; MICE; MICE, INBRED CBA; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 39349110546     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480701509941     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Borg E, Viberg A. Extra inner hair cell: prevalence and noise susceptibility. Hear Res 1995;83:175-82.
2. Kato T. Physiologie der Binnenmuskeln des Ohres. Pflügers Arch Physiol 1913;150:569-625.
3. Drescher DG, Eldredge DH. Species differences in cochlear fatigue related to acoustics of outer and middle ears of guinea pig and chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1974;56:929-34.
4. Saunders JC, Tilney LG. Species differences in susceptibility to noise exposure. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, editors. New perspectives on noise-induced hearing loss. New York: Raven Press; 1982. p. 229-48.
5. Engström B, Borg E, Canlon B. Morphology of stereocilia of cochlear hair cells after noise exposure. In: Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Hamernik KP, Colletti V, editors. Basic and applied aspects of noise-induced hearing loss. Nato Sci Series A: vol. III Life Sciences. New York: Plenum Press; 1986. p. 1-9.
6. Burdick CK, Patterson JH, Mozo BT, Camp RT Jr. Threshold shifts in chinchillas exposed to octave bands of noise centered at 63 and 1000 Hz for three days (a). J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64:458-66.
7. Henry KR. Age-related changes in sensitivity of the postpubertal ear to acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1982;8:285-94.
8. Duan ML, Agerman K, Ernfors P, Canlon B. Complementary roles of neurotrophin 3 and an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in the protection of noise and aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:7597-602.
9. Duan ML, Canlon B. Short-term adaptation in the peripheral auditory system is related to the AMPA receptor. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2001;121:21-7.
10. Liang Z. Parametric relation between impulse noise and auditory damage. In: Dancer A, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, Hamernik RP, editors. Noise-induced hearing loss. St Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1992. p. 325-35.
11. Tota G, Bocci G. Importance of the color of the iris in the evaluation of resistance of hearing to fatigue. Riv Otoneurooftalmol 1967;43:189-92.
12. Garber SR, Turner CW, Creel D, Witkop CJ Jr. Auditory system abnormalities in human albinos. Ear Hear 1982;3:207-10.
13. Kleinstein RN, Seitz MR, Barton TE, Smith CR. Iris color and hearing loss. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984;61:145-9.
14. Barrenas ML. Hair cell loss from acoustic trauma in chloroquine-treated red, black and albino guinea pigs. Audiology 1997;36:187-201.
15. Barrenas ML, Holgers KM. Ototoxic interaction between noise and pheomelanin: distortion product otoacoustic emissions after acoustical trauma in chloroquine-treated red, black, and albino guinea pigs. Audiology 2000;39:238-46.
16. Conlee JW, Abdul-Baqi KJ, McCandless GA, Creel DJ. Differential susceptibility to noise-induced permanent threshold shift between albino and pigmented guinea pigs. Hear Res 1986;23:81-91.
17. Bartels S, Ito S, Trune DR, Nuttall AL. Noise-induced hearing loss: the effect of melanin in the stria vascularis. Hear Res 2001;154:116-23.
18. Borg E, Nilsson R. Acoustic reflex in industrial noise. In: Silman S, editor. The acoustic reflex. Basic principles and clinical applications. New York: Academic Press; 1984. p. 413-40.
19. Borg E, Counter SA. The middle-ear muscles. Sci Am 1989;260:74-80.
20. Tonndorf J, McArdle F, Kruger B. Middle ear transmission losses caused by tympanic membrane perforation in cats. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1976;81:330-6.
21. Rosowski JJ. The effects of external- and middle-ear filtering on auditory threshold and noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;90:124-35.
22. Rosowski JJ, Brinsko KM, Tempel BI, Kujawa SG. The aging of the middle ear in 129s6/SvEvTac and CBA/Caj mice: measurements of umbo velocity, hearing function, and the incidence of pathology. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2003;4:371-83.