Modelling the results of health promotion activities in Switzerland: Development of the Swiss model for outcome classification in health promotion and prevention

Health Promotion International

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 86-97

  Spencer, Brenda ^a   Broesskamp Stone, Ursel ^b   Ruckstuhl, Brigitte ^b   Ackermann, Günter ^b   Spoerri, Adrian ^c   Cloetta, Bernhard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b Health Promotion Switzerland   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Health outcome model; Health promotion; Measurement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROMOTION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SWITZERLAND;

HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRIMARY PREVENTION; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 39349109781     PISSN: 09574824     EISSN: 14602245     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dam038     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abel, T. (1999) Gesundheitsrelevante Lebensstile: Zur Verbindung von handlungs- und strukturtheoretischen Aspekten in der modernen Ungleichheitsforschung. In Maeder, C., Burton-Jeangros, C. and Haour-Knipe, M. (eds), Gesundheit, Medizin und Gesellschaft: Beiträge zur Soziologie der Gesundheit. Seismo-Verlag, Zürich, pp. 43-61.
2. Ackermann, G. and Spencer, B. (2005) Présentation et mise en oeuvre du modèle pour la catégorisation des résultats de projets de promotion de la santé et de prévention. In Promotion santé suisse: 7e Conférence nationale sur la promotion de la santé, February 27-28, Fribourg.
3. Antonovsky, A. (1996) The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 11-18.
4. Armitage, C.J. and Conner, M. (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.
5. Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
6. Bauer, G., Davies, J.K., Pelikan, J., Noack, H., Broesskamp, U., Hill, C. on behalf of the EUHPID Consortium (2003) Advancing a theoretical model for public health and health promotion indicator development: proposal from the EUHPID consortium. The European Journal of Public Health, 13, 107-113.
7. Bauer, G., Kenneth Davies, J., Pelinkan, J. on behalf of the EUPHID Theory Working Group and the EUHPID Consortium (2006) The EUHPID health development model for the classification of public health indicators. Health Promotion International, 21, 153-159.
8. Bracht, N. and Tsouros, A. (1990) Principles and strategies of effective community participation. Health Promotion International, 5, 199-208.
9. Briss, P.A., Zaza, S., Pappaioanou, M., Fielding, J., Wright-De Agüero, L., Truman, B. I., et al. (2000) Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services: methods. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 35-43.
10. Bury, J., Boggio, Y., Lafuente, F., Mathey, J., Schlusselé, S. and Zellweger, E. (2005) Evaluation du Programme Suisse Balance: rapport final. Agence pour le Développement et L'évaluation des Politiques de Santé, Genève.
11. CDC Evaluation Working Group (2006) Logic model resources. Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA.
12. Center for Disease Control (1999) Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 48, 1-40.
13. Chen, H. T. (1994) Current trends and future directions in program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15, 229-237.
14. Cloetta, B., Spencer, B., Spörri, A., Ruckstuhl, B. and Ackermann, G. (2005) Un outil pour la catégorisation des résultats de projets de promotion de la santé. Promotion and Education, 12, 32-37.
15. Cloetta, B., Spencer, B., Spörri, A., Ruckstuhl, B., Broesskamp, U. and Ackermann, G. (2004) Ein Modell zur systematischen Kategorisierung der Ergebnisse von Gesundheitsförderungsprojekten 7039. Prävention: Zeitschrift für Gesundheitsförderung, 27, 67-72.
16. Die Bundesversammlung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft (2006) Bundesgesetz über die Krankenversicherung (KVG) 832.10 vom 18. März 1994 (Stand am 28. März 2006). 3. Abschnitt: Förderung der Gesundheit, Art. 19: Förderung der Verhütung von Krankeiten. Bundesregierung (online). http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/8/832.10.de.pdf (last accessed 31 January 2007).
17. Dooris, M. (2005) Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promotion International, 21, 55-65.
18. Earp, J.A. and Ennett, S. T. (1991) Conceptual models for health education research and practice. Health Education Research, 6, 163-171.
19. European Commission (1999) The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: shaping public health in a new Europe, Parts 1 and 2: A Report for the European Commission, 1st edition. Jouve Composition and Impression, Paris.
20. Funnell, S. (1997) Program logic: an adaptable tool for designing and evaluating programs. Evaluation News and Comment, 6, 5-17.
21. Funnell, S. (2000) Developing and using a program theory matrix for program evaluation and performance monitoring. New Directions for Evaluation, 87, 101.
22. Glasgow, R. E. and Vogt, T. M. (1999) Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1332-1327.
23. Goldenberg, M. J. (2006) On evidence and evidence-based medicine: lessons from the philosophy of science. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2621-2632.
24. Green, L. W. and Kreuter, M. W. (2004) Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
25. Green, L.W. and Lewis, F.M. (1986) Measurement and Evaluation in Health Education and Health Promotion. Mayfield Publ. Co., Palo Alto, CA.
26. Hepworth, J. (1997) Evaluation in health outcomes research: linking theories, methodologies and practice in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 12, 233-238.
27. Hubley, J. (2002) Health empowerment, health literacy and health promotion: putting it all together. Leeds International Health Promotion (online). http://www.hubley.co.uk/1hlthempow.htm (last accessed 31 January 2007).
28. Hyndman, B., Hershfiel, L. and Thesenvitz, J. (2001) Logic Models Workbook, 6.1 edition. The Health Communication Unit at the Centre for Health Promotion University of Toronto, Toronto.
29. Irwig, L., McCaffery, K., Sakeld, G. and Bossuyt, P. (2006) Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation. British Medical Journal, 332, 1148-1150.
30. IUHPE (2004) Efficacité de la promotion de la santé: actes du colloque organisé par l'INPES avec la collaboration de l'UIPES. Promotion et Education, 1-55.
31. IUHPE (2005) The challenge of getting evidence into practice: current debates and future strategies. Promotion and Education, 1-73.
32. Kahan, B. and Goodstadt, M. (2001) Best practices in health promotion: using the Interactive Domain Model (IDM) approach, information sheets. Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, Toronto.
33. Kahan, B. and Goodstadt, M. (2005) The IDM Manual: A Guide to the IDM (Interactive Domain Model) Best Practices Approach to Better Health, 3rd edition. Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, Toronto.
34. Kemm, J. (2006) The limitations of 'evidence-based' public health. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 319-324.
35. Kickbusch, I. (2002) Health literacy: a search for new categories. Health Promotion International, 17, 1-2.
36. King, L. (1996) An outcomes hierarchy for health promotion: a tool for policy, planning and evaluation. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 6, 50-51.
37. Knoepfel, P. and Bussmann, W. (1998). Les politiques publiques comme objet d'évaluation. In Bussmann, W., Klöti, U. and Knoepfel, P. (eds), Politiques Publiques: Évaluation. Economica, Paris, pp. 55-72.
38. Lalonde, M. (1974) A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians: A Working Document. Ministry of National Health and Welfare, Government of Canada, Ottawa.
39. Lambert, H., Gordon, E.J. and Bogdan-Lovis, E.A. (2006) Introduction: gift horse or Trojan horse? Social science perspectives on evidence-based health care. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2613-2620.
40. Learmonth, A. and Mackie, P. (2000) Evaluating effectiveness in health promotion: a case of re-inventing the millstone? Health Education Journal, 59, 267-280.
41. Lefcourt, H.M. (1982) Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
42. Letts, L. and Dunal, L. (1995) Tackling evaluation: applying a programme logic model to community rehabilitation for adults with brain injury. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy - Revue Canadienne d Ergotherapie, 62, 268-277.
43. Lincoln, Y.S. (1992) Sympathetic connections between qualitative methods and health research. Qualitative Health Research, 2, 375-391.
44. Macdonald, G. (1997) Quality indicators and health promotion effectiveness. Promotion and Education, 4, 5-9.
45. McQueen, D.V. (2001) Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 16, 261-268.
46. McQueen, D.V. (2003) The evidence debate broadens: three examples. Sozial- und Praeventivmedizin/Social and Preventive Medicine, 48, 275-276.
47. Ministry of Health (2006) A Guide to Developing Public Health Programmes: A Generic Programme Logic Model. The Ministry, Wellington, NZ.
48. Nutbeam, D. (1998) Evaluating health promotion: progress, problems and solutions. Health Promotion International, 13, 27-44.
49. Nutbeam, D. (2000) Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15, 259-262.
50. O'Neill, M. (2003) Pourquoi se préoccupe-t-on tant des données probantes en promotion de la santé? Sozial- und Praeventivmedizin/Social and Preventive Medicine, 48, 317-326.
51. Patton, M.Q. (1997) Utilization Focused Evaluation. Sage, London.
52. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. Sage, London.
53. Peterson, C., Seligman, M.E.P. and Maier, S.F. (1995) Learned Helplessness: A Theory for the Age of Personal Control. Oxford University Press, New York.
54. Prochaska, J. and Velicer, W. (1997) introduction: the transtheoretical model. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 7.
55. Raphael, D. (2000) The question of evidence in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 15, 355-367.
56. Reed, K., Cheadle, A. and Thompson, B. (2000) Evaluating prevention programs with the Results Mapping evaluation tool: a case study of a youth substance abuse prevention program. Health Education Research, 15, 73-84.
57. Rootman, I., Goodstadt, M., Potvin, L. and Springett, J. (2001) A Framework for Health Promotion Evaluation. European Series No. 92. WHO Regional Publications, Copenhagen.
58. Rychetnik, L., Frommer, M., Hawe, P. and Shiell, A. (2002a) Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 119-127.
59. Rychetnik, L., Frommer, M., Hawe, P. and Shiell, A. (2002b) Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 119-127.
60. Saan, H. and de Haes, W. (2005) Gezond effect bevorderen: het organiseren van effectieve gezondheidsbevordering. Uitgave van het NIGZ, Woerden.
61. Saan, H. and de Haes, W. (2006) Development and implementation of the Dutch health promotion framework. In 14th European Conference on Public Health, November 16-18, Montreux, Index E7, Track: Health Promotion. European Journal of Public Health, 16, 99.
62. Schmitz, C. (1999) Everything you wanted to know about logic models but were afraid to ask. InSites, Fort Collins, CO.
63. Shediac-Rizkallah, M.C. and Bone, L.R. (1998) Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Education Research, 13, 87-108.
64. Speller, V. and Learmonth, A. (1997) The search for evidence of effective health promotion. British Medical Journal, 315, 361-363.
65. Spencer, B., Broesskamp-Stone, U., Ruckstuhl, B., Ackermann, G., Spoerri, A. and Cloetta, B. (2006) Supporting policy development: the Swiss Model for Outcome Classification in Health Promotion and Prevention (SMOC). 14th European Conference on Public Health, November 16-18, Montreux, Index E7, Track: Health Promotion. European Journal of Public Health, 16, 99.
66. Springett, J., Costongs, C. and Dugdill, L. (1995) Towards a framework for evaluation in health promotion: methodology, principles and practice. The Journal, Summer, 61-65.
67. Thompson, J.C. (1992) Program evaluation within a health promotion framework. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 83, S67-S71.
68. Thurston, W.E., Vollmann, A., Wilson, D., MacKean, G., Felix, R. and Wright, M.F. (2003) Development and testing of a framework for assessing the effectiveness of health promotion. Sozial- und Praeventivmedizin/Social and Preventive Medicine, 48, 301-316.
69. Tones, K. (2000) Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors. Patient Education and Counseling, 39, 227-236.
70. Tones, K., Tilford, S. and Robinson, Y.K. (1991) Health Education: Effectiveness and Efficiency, 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall, London.
71. Wallenstein, N. (2006) What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Health Evidence Network Report. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
72. Watson, J. and Wimbush, E. (2000). Developing an outcomes model for evaluating the effectiveness of health promotion. Theory, quality and effectiveness: building an evaluation framework for health promotion. In Outcomes in health promotion: towards a framework for evidence and effectiveness in health promotion. Proceedings of the Third Nordic Health Promotion Research Conference, September 6-9, Tampere. Publications 5. School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
73. Yeo, M. (1993) Toward an ethic of empowerment for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 8, 225-235.
74. Ziglio, E. (1997) How to move toward evidence-based health promotion interventions. Promotion and Education, 4, 29-32.