Discovering variables that affect MANET protocol performance*

GLOBECOM - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1237-1242

  Kurkowski, Stuart ^a   Navidi, William ^b   Camp, Tracy ^b  

^a Air Force Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Mobile ad hoc networks; Performance evaluation; Simulation variables; Wireless networks

Indexed keywords

MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS (MANET); NETWORK SIMULATORS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; PACKET NETWORKS; ROUTING PROTOCOLS;

AD HOC NETWORKS;

EID: 39349109469     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2007.238     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. C. Barrett, M. Drozda, A. Marathe, and M. Marathe. Characterizing the interaction between routing and MAC protocols in ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 92-103, 2002.
2. T. Camp, J. Boleng, B. Williams, L. Wilcox, and W. Navidi. Performance comparison of two location based routing protocols for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), pages 1678-1687, 2002.
3. Y. Ko and N.H. Vaidya. Location-aided routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 66-75, 1998.
4. S. Kurkowski, T. Camp, and M. Colagrosso. MANET simulation scenarios: The incredibles. ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review (MC2R), pages 50-61, October, 2005.
5. S. Kurkowski, W. Navidi, and T. Camp. Discovering variables that affect MANET protocol performance. Technical report, Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Colorado School of Mines, MCS-06-04, June 2006.
6. A. Miller. Subset Selection in Regression, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, 2002.
7. W. Navidi and T. Camp. Stationary distributions for the random waypoint mobility model. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(1):99-108, January-March 2004.
8. K. Pawlikowski. Do not trust all simulation studies of telecommunications networks. International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pages 899-908, 2003.
9. K. Pawlikowski, J. Jeong, and R. Lee. On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 132-139, 2001.
10. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. Ad hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing. Request for Comments 3561, July 2003.
11. D. Perkins, H. Hughes, and C. Owens. Factors affecting the performance of ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pages 2048-2052. IEEE Press, 2002.
12. The CMU Monarch Project. The CMU monarch extensions to the ns simulator. URL: http://www.monarch.cs.cmu.edu/. Page accessed on June 12, 2006.
13. The SEACORN Project. SEACORN simulation tools. URL: http://seacorn. ptinovacao.pt/sim_tools.html. Page accessed on June 12, 2006.
14. The VINT Project. The network simulator - ns-2. URL: http://www.isi.edu/ nsnam/ns/. Page accessed on June 18th, 2006.
15. M. Totaro and D. Perkins. Using statistical design of experiments for analyzing mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM), pages 159-168, 2005.
16. K. Vadde and V. Syrotiuk. Factor interaction on service delivery in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 22(7):1335-1346, 2004.