Evaluating the role of postconstruction support in sustaining drinking water projects evidence from Peru

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 294-305

  Prokopy, Stalker Linda ^a   Thorsten, Rich ^b   Bakalian, Alex ^c   Wakeman, Wendy ^c  

^a Purdue University ^*  (United States)

^b WaterPartners International   (United States)

^c WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

Peru; Postconstruction support; Rural; Water supply

Indexed keywords

EID: 39349101203     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X07311072     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Black, Maggie. 1998. Learning what works: A twenty year retrospective on international water and sanitation cooperation. Washington, DC: United National Development Programme, World Bank Water and Sanitation Program.
2. Briscoe, J., M. Chakraborty, and S. Ahmed. 1981. How Bengali villagers choose sources of domestic water. Water Supply Management 5: 165-81.
3. Briscoe, J., P. F. de Castro, C. Griffin, J. North, and O. Olsen. 1990. Toward equitable and sustainable rural water supplies: A contingent valuation study in Brazil. World Bank Economic Review 4 (2): 115-34.
4. Cairncross, Sandy, Ian Carruthers, Donald Curtis, Richard Feachem, David Bradley, and George Baldwin. 1980. Evaluation for village water supply planning. New York: John Wiley.
5. Feacham, R.G. 1980. Community participation in appropriate water supply and sanitation technologies: The mythology for the decade. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 209: 15-29.
6. Gross, B., C. van Wijk, and N. Mukherjee. 2001. Linking sustainability with demand, gender and poverty. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Program.
7. Isham, J., and S. Kahkonen. 1999. Institutional determinants of the impact of community-based water services: Evidence from Sri Lanka and India. College Park, MD: IRIS.
8. Isham, J., and S. Kahkonen. 2002. Institutional determinants of the impact of community-based water services: Evidence from Sri Lanka and India. Economic Development and Cultural Change 50: 667-91.
9. Khawja, Asim Ijaz. 2002. Can good projects succeed in bad communities? Collective action in public good provision. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
10. Kleemeier, Elizabeth. 2000. The impact of participation on sustainability: An analysis of the Malawi Rural Piped Water Scheme Program. World Development 28 (5): 929-44.
11. Lockwood, H. 2003. Post-project sustainability: Follow-up support to communities. Unpublished manuscript (draft, 63 pp.), World Bank, Washington DC.
12. Mansuri, Ghazala, and Vijayendra Rao. 2003. Evaluating community-based and community-driven development: A critical review of the evidence. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECAREGTOP-COMDRIDEV/Resources/ DECstudy.pdf (accessed on November 8, 2007).
13. Narayan, D. 1995. The contribution of people's participation: Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. Environmentally sustainable development occasional paper, series 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.
14. Oakley, P. 1991. Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Office.
15. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. 2000. Evaluación global de los servicios de agua y saneamiento-2000. Informe analítico [Global evaluation of water and sanitation services-2000. Informal report]. Lima, Peru: Organizacion Panamerica de la Salid/Oficina Regional de la Organization Mundial de la Salud.
16. Prokopy, Linda Stalker. 2004. Women's participation in rural water supply projects in India: Is it moving beyond tokenism and does it matter? Water Policy 6: 103-16.
17. Prokopy, Linda Stalker. 2005. The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply projects in India. World Development 33 (11): 1801-19.
18. Sara, Jennifer, and Travis Katz. 1997. Making rural water supply sustainable: Recommendations from a global study. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Programme, Water and Sanitation Program.
19. Schouten, Tom, and Patrick Moriarty. 2003. Community water, community management: From system to service in rural areas. London: International Technology Development Group.
20. Schumacher, E.F. 1973. Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York: Harper and Row.
21. Sohail, M., M. Asce, S. Cavill, and A.P. Cotton. 2005. Sustainable operation and maintenance of urban infrastructure: Myth or reality? Journal of Urban Planning and Development 131 (1): 39-49.
22. Tamayo, Gonzalo, Roxana Barrantes,, Elena Conterno, and Alberto Bustamante. 1999. Reform efforts and low-level equilibrium in the Peruvian water sector. In Spilled water: Institutional commitment in the provision of water services, edited by William D. Savedoff and Pablo T. Spiller, 89-134. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
23. Therkildsen, Ole. 1988. Water white elephants? Lessons from donor funded planning and implementation of rural water supplies in Tanzania. Uppsala, Sweden: Scandinavian Institute for African Studies.
24. Van Ryzin Gregg G. 2004. Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23 (3): 433-48.
25. Water and Sanitation for Health Project. 1994. The sustainability of donor-assisted rural water supply projects. Water and Sanitation for Health Project technical report no. 94., April. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation for Health Project.
26. Weinberger, K., and J.P. Jutting. 2001. Determinants of participation in local development groups: Experiences from group based projects in Kashmir and Chad. Bonn, Germany: Center for Development Research.
27. Whittington, Dale, Jennifer Davis, and Elizabeth McClelland. 1998. Implementing a demand-driven approach to community water supply planning: A case study of Lugazi, Uganda. Water International 23: 134-45.
28. World Bank Water Demand Research Team. 1993. The demand for water in rural areas: Determinants and policy implications. The World Bank Research Observer 8 (1): 47-70.
29. Who, Unicef. Global water supply and sanitation assessment 2000 report. 2000. Washington, DC: World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund.