Robust design and optimization for autonomous PV-wind hybrid power systems

Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 401-409

  Shi, Jun Hai ^a   Zhong, Zhi Dan ^a   Zhu, Xin Jian ^a   Cao, Guang Yi ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Constraint multi objective optimizations; Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS); Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS); Multi objective genetic algorithms; PV wind power system; Robust design

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUST CONTROL;

CONSTRAINT MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATIONS; HYBRID POWER SYSTEMS; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING (LHS); MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHMS; PV-WIND POWER SYSTEM; ROBUST DESIGN METHOD;

WIND POWER;

EID: 39349098789     PISSN: 1673565X     EISSN: 18621775     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A071317     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Avramidis, A.N., Wilson, J.R., 1996. Integrated variance reduction strategies for simulation. Operations Research, 44(2):327-346.
2. Bernal-Agustín, J.L., Dufo-López, R., Rivas-Ascaso, D.M., 2006. Design of isolated hybrid systems minimizing costs and pollutant emissions. Renewable Energy, 31(14):2227-2244. [doi:10.1016/j.renene.2005.11. 002]
3. Celik, A.N., 2003. Techno-economic analysis of autonomous PV-wind hybrid energy systems using different sizing methods. Energy Conversion and Management, 44(12):1951-1968. [doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00223-6]
4. Deb, K., 2000. An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 186(2-4):311-338. [doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00389-8]
5. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyariva, T., 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):182-197. [doi:10.1109/4235.996017]
6. Kellogg, W., Nehrir, M.H., Venkataramannan, G., Gerez, V., 1996. Optimal unit sizing for a hybrid wind/photovoltaic generating system. Electric Power Systems Research, 39(1):35-38. [doi:10.1016/S0378-7796(96)01096-6]
7. Kicinger, R., Arciszewski, T., de Jong, K., 2005. Evolutionary computation and structural design: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Computers and Structures, 83(23-24):1943-1978. [doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.002]
8. Lagaros, N.D., Plevris, V., Papadrakakis, M., 2005. Multi-objective design optimization using cascade evolutionary computations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194(30-33):3496-3515. [doi:10.1016/j.cma. 2004.12.029]
9. Notton, G., Muselli, M., Poggi, P., 1998. Costing of a stand-alone photovoltaic system. Energy, 23(4):289-308. [doi:10.1016/S0360-5442(97)00092-3]
10. Notton, G., Muselli, M., Poggi, P., Louche, A., 2001. Decentralized wind energy systems providing small electrical loads in remote areas. International Journal of Energy Research, 25(2):141-164. [doi:10.1002/er.670]
11. Protogeropoulos, C., Brinkworth, B.J., Marshall, R.H., 1997. Sizing and techno-economical optimization for hybrid solar photovoltaic/wind power systems with battery storage. International Journal of Energy Research, 21(6):465-479. [doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(199705)21:6«465::AID-ER273»3.0.CO;2-L]
12. Shi, J.H., Zhu, X.J., Cao, G.Y., 2007. Design and techno-economical optimization for stand-alone hybrid power systems with multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. International Journal of Energy Research, 31(3):315-328. [doi:10.1002/er.1247]
13. Wichert, B., 1997. PV-diesel hybrid energy systems for remote area power generation-A review of current practice and future developments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 1(3):209-228. [doi:10.1016/S1364-0321(97)00006-3]