Working to learn: Internships for today's social work students

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 513-528

  Newman, Bernie S ^a   Dannenfelser, Paul L ^a   Clemmons, Valarie ^a   Webster, Sharon ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b North City Congress   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39349086560     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2007.200500566     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abbott, A. A. (1986). The field placement contract: Its use in maintaining comparability between employment-related and traditional field placements. Journal of Social Work Education, 22, 57-66.
2. Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Globerman, J. (2002). Evaluating a measure of student field performance in direct service: Testing, reliability, and validity of explicit criteria. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 385-401.
4. Caspi, J., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Educational supervision in social work: A task centered model for field instruction and staff development. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Council on Social Work Education. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
6. Dore, M. M., Epstein, B. B., & Herrerias, C. (1992). Evaluating students' micro practice field performance: Do universal learning objectives exist? Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 353-362.
7. Glassman, U. E. (2000). Comparing a work-study field instruction model with an assigned field instruction model. Ann Arbor, MI: Bell & Howell Information and Learning.
8. Hines, W. J., & Singer, T. L. (1984). Work-study: A model for part-time social work education. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 3, 23-27.
9. Kendall, K. (2002). Council on Social Work Education: Its antecedents and first twenty years. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
10. Koroloff, N. M. (1989). Using the employment site for field instruction: A case for structure. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5, 45-48.
11. Lennon, T. M. (2004). Statistics on social work education in the United States: 2002. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
12. Martin, M. (1989). Employment setting as a practicum site: A field instruction dilemma. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5, 39-44.
13. Navari, S. (1991). The implications of part-time programs for field work models: Provocative dilemmas and conceptual frameworks. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 272-287). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/ Hunt.
14. Royse, D., Dhooper S. S., & Rompf, E. L. (1999). Field instruction: A guide for social work students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2005). Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
16. Schneck, D. (1991). Integration of learning in field education: Elusive goal and educational imperative. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 67-77). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
17. White, H. R. (1988). Pros and cons of student placement with employers. Arete, 13,50-59.